The Principles of the Code So Far Extracted - Principia Codicis

Luke 3:23-28, the maternal genealogy express in terms of the husbands of all his female ancestors.

CNC = 4 (1 thread)
INC =  Jesus, Years, Son, Joseph

For more see U49 and Matthew or Mark or Luke or John

Event Symbolism vs Word Symbolism

If the reader is puzzling over what precise distinction we are making, between event symbolism and word symbolism then please consider the following non scriptural example:

King Nebuchadnezzar went fishing. The king caught a fish. Nebuchadnezzar put the fish back. His servants said: My Lord, why did you not eat the fish. Nebuchadnezzar the King of Babylon said: Because I didn't have any chips to eat it with!

In the literal meaning of this little (made up) story the character referred to variously as:

King Nebuchadnezzar (adjective and noun)
The King
Nebuchadnezzar
My Lord
Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon (double designation)

is just one character. He is Nebuchadnezzar, the King of Babylon, the Lord over his servants. But in the Word symbolism, we are talking about 5 different but related characters. 'My Lord', 'the King' and 'Nebuchadnezzar' may be totally unrelated, but King Nebuchadnezzar will be related to 'The King' and to 'Nebuchadnezzar' and to 'Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon', since it shares common words with these other designations. In Word1...

My Lord is Jesus
The King is the 3rd Holy Spirit
Nebuchadnezzar, the King is the all the 2nd presence 1NCs.
Nebuchadnezzar is the 2nd presence 1NC reserves
King Nebuchadnezzar is the 2nd presence 1NC reserves after they have married Jesus and become Kings

Event symbolism is referred to variously in this book and in the website www.truebiblecode.com as the first symbolism, the straight symbolism, the straightforward symbolism.

Word symbolism is referred to as the second symbolism, the coded symbolism, the account symbolism.

Peter says: 

19 Consequently we have the prophetic word [made] more sure and you are doing well in paying attention to it as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until day dawns and a daystar rises, in your hearts.
20 For you know this first, that no prophecy of Scripture springs from any private interpretation.
21 For prophecy was at no time brought by man's will, but men spoke from God as they were borne along by holy spirit (2 Peter 1).

8 The sovereign Lord Jehovah himself has spoken who will not prophesy? (Amos 3).

The bible is the word of God, and is all delivered to us through Jesus, who is also called the word of God - see [C2.3]  so it is all prophetic. This is what Paul meant when he said:

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).

Example 1

1 When Israel was a boy, then I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son. (Hosea 11).

These words from the prophet Hosea are a historical statement about the calling of the nation of Israel out of Egypt at the time of Moses. But Matthew knew that they had a further fulfilment involving a further son:

15 and he stayed there until the decease of Herod, for that to be fulfilled which was spoken by Jehovah through his prophet, saying: Out of Egypt I called my son (Matthew 2).

This time the son was Jesus who was taken to Egypt by his parents to avoid persecution by Herod. So there can be no argument that this particular scripture has a further meaning. This second meaning cannot be literal since there can only be one literal meaning which is the historical meaning. So the second fulfilment results from a second meaning which is a symbolic meaning. In fact it is the word symbolic meaning of this verse of Hosea.

Example 2

Consider now the words of Jesus in Matthew 24:

21 For then there will be great tribulation such as has not occurred since the world's beginning until now, no, nor will occur again.
22 In fact, unless those days were cut short, not all [chosen] flesh would be saved; but on account of the chosen ones those days will be cut short (Matthew 24).

This looks like it applies to a great tribulation leading into Armageddon, since the 'world', which is biblical terms is the system of things post Adam's fall and pre Armageddon, is still ongoing, and we haven't all died yet (neither do we all die at the end). But in the same chapter we read:

15 Therefore, when you catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation, as spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in a holy place, (let the reader use discernment,) 16 then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains (Matthew 24).

This looks like it applies to the end of the Jewish system of things, and the great tribulation on the inhabitants of Jerusalem from 66Tishri when the Roman General Cestius entered the temple in Jerusalem until to 70Ab when the Roman General Titus burned the temple in Jerusalem. Obviously fleeing to the literal mountains of Judea is not a viable option for people in Colorado at the end of the World. 

For these reasons and other reasons, many Christian churches understand that Matthew 24 applies both to the end of the Jewish system of things 66-70 AD and the end of this system of things (The great tribulation and Armageddon). However what they have hitherto failed to understand is that rather than some verses applying to one end and other verses applying to the other end, the whole account has a literal (although somewhat metaphorically stated) meaning applying to the end of the Jewish system of things and a symbolic meaning applying to this whole system of things, 'the world'. So actually every verse applies to the end of Jerusalem by the Romans in the first meaning and to the end of the World by the final corruption of the UN in the second meaning, which is the word symbolic meaning of Matthew 24. For the UN started as a great humanitarian organisation but ends as a corrupt worldwide dictatorship. If you do not believe that this sort of thing happens, then read animal farm by George Orwell, or go see Star Wars, the attack of the clones. The bad guys always begin by posing as saviours - the UK/US are also going rotten by the same route presently. The bible describes them as follows:

11 And I saw another wild beast ascending out of the earth, and it had two horns like a lamb, but it began speaking as a dragon (Revelation 13).

The two horns are the twin powers of the US and the UK. The horns of a lamb are sacrificial and saving. Both powers made great sacrifices and saved the world in two world wars. But the dragon is Satan's heavenly administration. And right now the US and the UK have ceased acting as a lamb and have started speaking as a dragon. In other words we lie. We lie about WMDs and procure war votes from congress and parliament using deception. Let us be more specific. The US and the UK were genuine true honest saviours in both World Wars. We used to be the good guys. We were also genuine true and honest saviours in the first Gulf War under Bush senior and stormy Norman. 

But in the second Gulf War war, under Bush junior and his generals, we are becoming the bad guys. During the run up to this war we posed as saviours but were in fact acting as aggressors on the basis of a deception. This is not to say that the removal of Saddam was not a good idea. There are many dictators that the world would be better off without and he was certainly one of them. But without getting involved in politics, it is a bad idea to lie to congress or parliament about WMDs and a bad idea to trick them both into declaring war on an unarmed man for the purpose of disarming him. For the full symbolic meaning of Revelation 13 (as far as we understand it) - see U158.

Now the writer is fully aware that the majority of UK and US nationals will not want to hear or believe or accept the above, because as a race, man believes what he is comfortable with and refuses to believe what he is uncomfortable with. This is why God chooses to save us on our faith, which is our belief. For if we love him, then we will be comfortable with him and so we will believe, but if we do not, then we will not be comfortable with him and so we will refuse to believe. 

But refusing to believe a truth has no effect on any reality, it only buries your head in the sand. So please, my brothers from every race, do not be like the Pakistani Muslims who were surveyed about 911, and 89% of whom believed that Muslims were not responsible for the Twin Towers Tragedy (actually it was a  controlled demolition so that Pakistani Muslims are not so far out!) And do not be like the sons of Jacob, most of whom believe that Jesus (whom their forefather's murdered) is not God's son. For we are all the same as them, and they are all the same as each other in genetic character predisposition. Believe instead in the truth, however uncomfortable it appears to be and however embarrassing it may be. Be like Daniel Barenboim the world class Jewish pianist who plays his music to the Palestinians because he will not hide from the truth. Now he truly is a son of Abraham, through the 1AC, and God himself will listen to his music for a very very long time - see [9], because one does not show courage and love like that without faith in God. And who cares about some minor embarrassment or about the loss of a few cushions under ones backside? Surely the truth is greater than these things? for the good book says:

32 Know the truth and the truth will set you free (John 8).

Here are another couple of famous examples from Matthew 24

2 Truly I say to you: By no means will a stone be left here upon a stone and not be thrown down (Matthew 24).

In the literal meaning, the temple was destroyed by the Roman General Titus in 70 CE, and the temple was knocked down, and no stone was left standing upon a stone. In the greater meaning the temple stones are the living stones of the Christian temple of the body of the Christ, which is all of the new covenant saints. And this is a prophecy that this temple will be knocked down, whilst the stones are still around. In other words what happened to the Jews, their rejection by God, will also happen to the first administration of the Christian church, under the New covenant Saints, these stones. Indeed the first true church compromised with Rome at the end of Nero's reign famous for his persecution of Christians and became the Roman Catholic church, headed by the Papacy initially of Pope St Linus on 67Tebbeth20 (4600 solar days of Daniel8 before they lost their constant feature of evangelism acceptable to God on 80Elul14, 1290 days of Daniel12 before they fell as a true church on 84Nisan14 - see U42 

Jesus when describing the signs of the times to his disciples said:

34 Truly I say to you that this generation will by no means pass away/come beside/arrive until all these things occur (Matthew 24).

In other words one generation will see all of the signs of the time and the end. Now we know that this was true in the case of the disciples and Jewish system of things. They saw the signs of the times and they saw General Titus destroy Jerusalem and burn the temple in 70CE. But there is a further meaning that applies to the generation that sees the signs of the times today during Jesus' second presence - which ended on 2013Adar10, when Laodicea lost its 4EC water baptism - see U45

Example 3

The apostle Paul in Galatians 4 informs us that 3 chapters of Genesis are written in a Symbolic Code. He says:

22 For example, it is written that Abraham acquired two sons, one by the servant girl and one by the free woman;
23 but the one by the servant girl was actually born in the manner of flesh, the other by the free woman through a promise.
24 These things stand as a symbolic drama; for these [women] mean two covenants, the one from Mount Sinai, which brings forth children for slavery, and which is Hagar.
25 Now this Hagar means Sinai, a mountain in Arabia, and she corresponds with the Jerusalem today, for she is in slavery with her children.
26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4).

Now we read about Hagar giving birth to Ishmael in Genesis 16, and we read about Sarah conceiving Isaac in Genesis 17 and her giving birth to Isaac in Genesis 21. So Paul is saying to us that these three chapters at the least, are a 'Symbolic Drama'. They have a greater meaning which is encoded symbolically. So these three chapters are not just dead history they are also living prophecy written in terms of dead history. They have a greater meaning relating to covenants. For our best attempt at the full story of Genesis 16 - see U210. Paul's actually says that the story of these women is an EXAMPLE of a symbolic drama, indicating that there are many other such examples. 

So come now dear reader, son or daughter of the greatest mind in the universe. Can you think of a question that is being begged of you by the holy spirit at this time?

What is so special about Genesis 16, Genesis 17, Genesis 21, Matthew 24 and Hosea 11?

Example 4

Here are the words of David before he became King of Israel. David was speaking about his own persecution as he hid in the wilderness for 7 years from the jealousy of King Saul.

1 My God, my God, why have you left me? (Psalm 22)

16 For dogs have surrounded me;
The assembly of evildoers themselves have enclosed me.
Like a lion [they are at] my hands and my feet.
17 I can count all my bones.
They themselves look, they gaze upon me.
18 They apportion my garments among themselves
And upon my clothing they cast lots (Psalm 22).

These words were uttered by David about his own personal situation. But they are inspired prophetic words, and they have a second fulfilment in the impalement/Crucifixion of Jesus Christ. For he said just before he died:

46 Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is, My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? (Matthew 27).

Not only this but the soldiers guarding him cast lots over his garments, none of his bones were broken on the stake (the legs of crucifixion victims were routinely broken by the Romans to speed up their deaths if necessary). The robbers on either side of him had their legs broken. Jesus was of course fastened by his hands and his feet to the stake. So here again is history which is also living prophecy. The literal Psalm applies to King David, the Word symbolic meaning applies to Jesus Christ. The application of this psalm of David to Jesus has been known for many years. But no man before 1992 realised that all scripture has a greater application, a greater meaning, not just Psalm 22.

So now we can ask the rhetorical question what is so special about Genesis 16, Genesis 17, Genesis 21, Matthew 24, Hosea 11 and Psalm 22?

Example 5

17 But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it dying you will die (Genesis 2).

The literal meaning was that Adam died, not physically but judicially on the literal day that he ate. By Judicial death we mean that Adam was under a death sentence, and 'as good as dead' from then on. He was living merely by means of a stay of execution of that sentence. Jesus meant the same thing when he said:

22 Let the dead bury their dead (Matthew 8).

He meant: Let those who are still under Adam's death sentence bury their physically dead ones. The greater meaning of God's command in Genesis is that all of Adam's sons die physically during the period or 'day', wherein they continue to eat from this tree of knowledge of good and bad. So today, for example, even though we are no longer in the garden of Eden, we are still eating and we are still dying. The 'Day' of Genesis 2:17, is therefore the 'day' of this system of things, it is still ongoing! But not for much longer. And when we stop eating, then we stop dying. Putting this another way, once we have learned Good from Bad, then obviously God no longer needs to kill us Judicially. When God threw Adam out of the garden he temporarily stopped him gaining access not to the tree of knowledge of Good and Bad, but to the tree of life:

24 And so he drove the man out and posted at the east of the garden of Eden the cherubs and the flaming blade of a sword that was turning itself continually to guard the way to the tree of life (Genesis 3).

Example 6

44 He now said to them: These are my words which I spoke to you while I was yet with you, that all the things written in the law of Moses and in the Prophets and Psalms about me must be fulfilled.
45 Then he opened up their minds fully to grasp the meaning of the Scriptures (Luke 24).

17 Indeed, it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one particle of a letter of the Law to go unfulfilled (Luke 16).

So the law is all prophetic having a fulfilment. For Paul says further:

21 Tell me, you who want to be under law [of Moses]: Do you not hear the Law [of God]?
22 For example, it is written that Abraham acquired two sons, one by the servant girl and one by the free woman (Galatians 4).

But the account of Abraham and his sons and wives is not in the Law of Moses, it is in Genesis, which must therefore be a part of the 'law' of God. Jesus says:

34 Jesus answered them: Is it not written in your Law: I said: You are gods? (John 10).

6 I myself have said, You are gods, And all of you are sons of the Most High (Psalm 82).

And again Jesus says:

25 But it is that the word written in their Law may be fulfilled, 'They hated me without cause.' (John 15:25).

4 They that hate me without a cause are more than the hairs of my head (Psalm 69 - Septuagint bible LXX)

Opening up your mind fully to grasp the meaning of the scriptures

Every verse of the Law of Moses, every verse of Genesis, every verse of the Psalms, is to be fulfilled again. In fact the whole bible is the law of mankind and all of it, every letter of it, has to be fulfilled a second time.  And for the majority of scriptures, we are now living in that time, which is why the same one, Jesus Christ, is opening up our minds yet again. For if every scripture has a further fulfilment then so does Luke 24 when it says:

45 Then he opened up their minds fully to grasp the meaning of the Scriptures.
46 and he said to them: In this way it is written that the Christ would suffer and rise from among the dead on the third day  (Luke 24).

So how can our minds be opened up? In what way is the suffering and resurrection timing of Jesus written in the scriptures? Well Jesus has already explained...

40 For just as Jonah was in the belly of the huge fish 3 days and 3 nights, so the Son of man will be in the heart of the earth 3 days and 3 nights (Matthew 12).

30 For just as Jonah became a sign to the Ninevites, in the same way will the Son of man be also to this generation.

It is encoded symbolically in a historical account about a prophet who was eaten by a big fish! Yes, it is another symbolic drama. Jesus opened up the minds of his disciples by making them aware that the book was written in this symbolic way and that every account stood symbolically for something else. This indeed is one reason why Jesus spoke to the crowds entirely in illustrations. He was teaching them and teaching us, that the whole bible was written in this way. Even his famous parables have a greater meaning in addition to the obvious moral message!

34 All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds by illustrations. Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them (Matthew 13).

First Proof of the Symbolic Structure Principle

Jesus only explained the meaning of two of his parables to his disciples in the scriptures. Of course he explained the meanings of many other parables to them privately, but the holy word only records two of his explanations. These explanations are therefore fundamental to all Christians and especially to bible decoders which Christians should now become. He explained the meanings of the parable of the wheat and the weeds, and of the parable of the sower who went to sow. 

In his explanation of the parable of the wheat and the weeds, Jesus gives us the meanings of the words: Sower, Field, Fine Seed, Weeds, Enemy, Harvest, all of which are repeated NOUNS in the account - see [The Repetition Principle]. And he gives the meaning of one further noun: Reapers, which is not repeated - see [70]. 

In his explanation of the sower who went to sow, in all three cases (Matthew13, Mark4 and Luke8), Jesus gives the meaning neither of words, nor of repeated words, but of unrepeated phrases which describe events in the parable - see [63]. 

So in the case of the weeds Jesus explains the meaning of the words in the parable (the repeated nouns except one) and in the case of the sower Jesus explains the meaning of the events in the parable (which are not repeated).  It is not hard to see, therefore, that Jesus is explaining the word symbolic meaning of the weeds and the event symbolic meaning of the sower. Furthermore, since he only explains these two types of symbolism, these are the only two types of symbolism employed by the bible code.

In other words these two are the beginning and end of the matter as regards bible symbolism. 

In fact the event symbolic meaning of the sower relates to the sowing of the seed of the Kingdom message in the soil of the hearts of the faithful, the sons of the 1AC, the children of Abraham by faith. Whereas the word symbolic meaning relates to the sowing of the seed of the saints into the soil of the congregation of a true church, the earth that is overseen by the mountain of the true church administration.

But the event symbolic meaning of the parable of the wheat and the weeds relates to the harvesting of the saints who are oversown with the offspring of vipers, the seed of Satan, who has his own Demonic Angelic Covenant. Whereas the word symbolic meaning relates to the harvesting of the faithful, the true believers, who are oversown with the hypocrites, the false believers, sons of the world, who join churches for all sorts of socio-economic reasons, but have little genuine interest in God. The method of harvesting in both cases is mobility. The true believers and the saints will be prepared to move to a new church if they see that it is now the true church. The offspring of vipers in the DAC and the sons of the world will not see the point in moving and will be trapped by their love for the status they hold in their original church.

So Jesus explains the meaning which relates to the faithful in both cases and not the meaning which relates to the saints. But the Repetition Principle tells us that in a 2 threaded account (which both parables are), if a noun appears as a noun an odd number of times then it takes only one meaning in all the symbolisms (it is invariant symbolically). So for several of the nouns that Jesus interprets in the phrases of the event symbolism relating to the faithful in the parable of the sower, we can use the same interpretation for them in the word symbolism relating to the saints. And the same is true for the parable of the wheat and the weeds. So actually Jesus does around 50% of the work for us in the alternative symbolism as well!

Second Proof of the Symbolic Structure Principle

The first 2 verses of the book of Revelation read:

1 A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John,
2 who bore witness to:

the word God gave
and to the witness Jesus Christ gave,
even to all the things he saw (Revelation 1).

Obviously 'all the things he saw' is the literal account of the vision. But John is also bearing witness to 'The word God gave'. This therefore is a witness to God's words themselves which is the word symbolic meaning. John is also bearing witness to the (symbolically expressed) witness that Jesus gave him in the form of the vision, this then is the event symbolic account, the symbolic meaning of the events of the vision.  

But then the reader must consider the following question. Did God, like we men do in many of our great projects, only work out how to write the bible properly when he had almost finished the job? Did he only work out how to inspire a symbolic bible account when he reached Revelation, having not thought of it at the time Moses wrote Genesis? 

Obviously not for he is:

10 The one telling from the beginning the finale, and from long ago the things that have not been done (Isaiah 46).

He is the one who knew that Man would walk on the moon before he said: Let there be light. So we deduce that every symbolic account in the whole bible is written in this same way as Revelation. So all symbolic accounts have an event symbolic meaning and a word symbolic meaning. 

It is not hard to see that literal accounts, such as the history of Abraham or David etc. have the same set of meanings as symbolic accounts except that the literal account is the event symbolic meaning. For a literal account is a symbolic account with no symbolism if you see what we mean. In mathematical terms this would be the identity symbolism. A symbolism in which an apple is always an apple and an orange is always an orange etc.

Accounts which contain both literal and symbolic portions, such as dreams, explanations and fulfilments, obey the two rules above for their respective portions.

Third Proof of the Symbolic Structure Principle

Do you remember the famous words of Jesus:

16 In this way the last ones will be first, and the first ones last (Matthew 20).

There are many meanings of this scripture and other scriptures which repeat this last being first concept. But one interesting one is that the last words of the bible tell the reader how to decode it. Hebrew books are read from the back to the front, they are read backwards. And this is a living prophecy from God, the creator of both English and Hebrew, that the decoding of the bible works backwards from the end. Much of our Chronology works backwards from the date of Armageddon. And as regards the bible code, well like any good text book, the answer can be looked up in the back of the book!

18 I am bearing witness to everyone (panti masculine) that hears the words (logouV masculine) of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds/imposes upon them (auta neuter - words or hearers), God will impose upon him the plagues that are written in this scroll.
19 And if anyone takes anything away from the words of the scroll of this prophecy, God will take his portion away from the trees of life and out of the holy city, things which are written about in this scroll (Revelation 22).

The literal meaning of these two verses is that if you add words to the scroll of Revelation itself, you will get plagues, and if you take words from the scroll of Revelation, corrupting the text, you will lose your everlasting life. 

1 A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John (Revelation 1).

11 saying: What you see write in a scroll and send it to the seven congregations, in Ephesus and in Smyrna and in Pergamum and in Thyatira and in Sardis and in Philadelphia and in Laodicea (Revelation 1).

6 And he said to me: These words are faithful and true, and the Lord, the God of the inspired expressions of the prophets sent his angel forth to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place.
7 And, look! I am coming quickly. Happy is anyone observing the words of the prophecy of this scroll.
8 Well, I John was the one hearing and seeing these things. And when I had heard and seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel that had been showing me these things (Revelation 22).

This scroll is the scroll of Revelation in the literal meaning that contains all the visions presented by the angel of Jesus (who must have been Gabriel) to John. More seriously, it appears that some bible versions of Revelation have bits added and bits removed. We shall have to investigate this further...

Since Revelation 22 is a literal account from verse 6 onwards, so the symbolic meaning is an account symbolism, and is further the very definition of how all the symbolic meanings of the bible work! For we have the words of the scroll of the prophecy and we have the words of the prophecy of the scroll. These two define the event symbolic and account symbolic meanings as follows:

So the bible has two symbolic grammars, if you like. There is a symbolic meaning of the prophecy of the scroll, which is the straight forward symbolism of the events in the account, the event symbolism. Then there is the symbolic meaning of the scroll of the prophecy, which is the symbolic meaning of the account of the events, the words that describe the events. Hence the name 'Word Symbolism' for this symbolic meaning. This may be another reason why Jesus is called the 'Word' of God.

So if anyone persecutes someone who understands the Event symbolism of Revelation then they get plagues. And if any sanctified person will not accept Word Symbolism then they get no more food from the tree of life, and they fail to join the holy city of FDS2/4 so they break their baptism.

The corollary of this is that the Holy City and the life giving food are derived from the Word Symbolic meanings of the bible.

Revelation makes the distinction between Event Symbolism and Word Symbolism using Word symbolism. It is an implicit distinction. But nonetheless, the distinction is there. 

For those who do not understand the meaning of explicit, consider the two equations below:

x=2+1   (explicit)
x+3=2x (implicit)

Both equations have the same solution, namely x=3, the latter equation defines x in terms of itself, this is the meaning of 'implicit'. Likewise Revelation 22:18,19 define event and account symbolisms through account symbolism. But verse 10 reads:

10 He also tells me: Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this scroll, for the appointed time is near (Revelation 22).

Whereas Gabriel said to Daniel: 

4 And as for you, Oh Daniel, make secret the words and seal up the scroll, until the time of [the] end. Many will rove about, and the [true] knowledge will become abundant (Daniel 12).

The words of the prophecy of the scroll are the event symbolic meaning. This meaning is the straight symbolism, it is not sealed. In fact mankind saw that the wild beast of Revelation 13 and 17 was the League of Nations in 1920. This is the event symbolic meaning. But the account symbolic meaning, the word symbolism, was sealed up until the time of the end, which began in 2008Nisan14, the end of the 6,000 year ARC lease of Michael and the start of the 1,000 year sacred Sabbath of the Kingdom of God. Now Revelation22 deliberately does not say: Do not seal up the words of the scroll of the prophecy, because the Word symbolic meaning was sealed up. 

So the same account that tells us not to mess around physically with the physical holy words of Revelation (and it tells us that false churches will do this), also tells us how precisely to mess around symbolically with these words in order to get their symbolic meanings (and true churches will do this). And by the Consistency Principle, this symbolic methodology applies, the two symbolisms apply, not just to the book of Revelation, but to the whole bible.

Fourth Proof of the Symbolic Structure Principle

Finally we have the shortest parable in the bible which is:

33 Another illustration he spoke to them: The kingdom of the heavens is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three large measures of flour, until the whole mass was fermented/leavened (Matthew 13).

Ok, you young paduan learners! If it is the most insignificant and smallest of the parables in the whole bible, then what does this tell you about its spiritual meaning in this upside down world in which we live?

Yes, it is the greatest of them all in meaning. Well, the event symbolic meaning is as follows:

The woman is the holy spirit, the leaven is the bible code, and the three lumps of flour are the literal, the event symbolic and the account symbolic meanings of the bible. When the whole mass is fermented/leavened (decoded), then we can truly eat the whole book and see both the code and the truth and God and the true religion and his plan and his love and his humour and his righteousness, and our total and utter pretentiousness and stupidity stretching over 3500 years. As regards the word symbolic meaning of Matthew 13:33 and the parallel account in Luke 13:20 please see section [69].

This leaven is not the wicked teachings of the Pharisees but is rather the good teachings of the true priesthood of God. This website is the result of such leaven. We are expanding the bread of heaven to make it fully digestible.

Question

If a 2 threaded parable is embedded in a 3 threaded literal account then it takes meanings 1,2,2 in that order. Just as a double designation takes designations 1,2,1 in a 3 word threaded account.????? 

[C6a] The Designations Principle

If one character or item in an account is referred to by two or more nouns or possessive noun chains, then these nouns or possessive noun chains refer to two or more characters or items in the word symbolic threads of the account. So in particular there is at least one word symbolic thread to the account.

This is because Word symbolism interprets the nouns themselves not the characters they refer to.

Example 1

Daniel 4 refers to the one character Nebuchadnezzar as:

Nebuchadnezzar, the king
King Nebuchadnezzar
Nebuchadnezzar
King
Lord

In the literal meaning all these designations refer to the same character. In the word symbolic thread - see U123

Daniel is Gordon
Belteshazzar is the mediator of the 2NC (a name of Gordon)
The Magic practicing priests are the 2NCs
My Lord is Jesus
The King is Jesus as sacred or secular king
Nebuchadnezzar the King is the all the 2nd presence 1NCs.
Nebuchadnezzar is the 2nd presence 1NC reserves

Example 2

Joshua 6 refers to the ark as

The ark
The ark of the covenant
The ark of Jehovah
The ark of the covenant of Jehovah

In the literal meaning all these designations describe the one acacia wood box made by Bezalel. But in the greater meaning in our current understanding of the account

The Ark = The greater ark of Noah.
The Ark of Jehovah is salvation from the 4EC
The Ark of the Covenant is salvation from 1AC
The Ark of the Covenant of Jehovah is the blessing of the CRC, CRC ark entry

[C6b] The Successive Designations Principle

The double or triple or quadruple designation (which we use to mean two, three, four successive designations), is the most important prophetic form in the bible. Here is the definition and the effect of this form... 

If a character or item designated by...

1. A noun acting as a noun
2. An adjective acting as a noun (which almost invariably means that it is preceded by 'the' i.e. is definite or is in the construct in Hebrew)
3. A participle, (a verb used as an adjective), which participle is acting as a noun, (which means that it must be preceded by 'the' i.e. is definite - such as 'the scorched [one]' or is in the construct in Hebrew)
4. A gerund (a verb acting as a noun such as a 'smoker')
5. The definite article acting as a noun in phrases starting 'The [one]' where '[one]' is implied and is of course acting as a noun.
6. The word 'tiV' meaning 'a certain one'.
7. The word 'eiV' meaning 'one' ????.

is referred to by 2, 3 or 4 successive such designations

And if all the designations when taken separately in the context of the verse act as nouns and the verse makes sense with each designation standing alone (which means that the designations must all be in the same case in Greek). 

And if any possessive pronoun in one of the successive designations is also in all other succeeding or preceding designations. So there is no pronoun imbalance. Or if there is a pronoun imbalance then there are no substitutions later in the account which fail to make sense as a result.

Then we have a double, triple or quadruple Successive Designation, which means there are 2, 3 or 4 Word Symbolic threads/strands/meanings to that account. 

The first Word Symbolic thread has only the first designation of any successive designations, and substitutes all second and third etc. successive designations to be the first successive designation (until any further successive designation redefines these substitutions). If there are two conflicting double designations then their substitutions cannot occur, so they are both invalidated (we deduced this from the Good Samaritan account in Luke 10 - see U218). The second Word Symbolic thread takes only the second designation of any successive designations etc. and substitutes the first and third etc. successive designations to be the second successive designation (until any further successive designation redefines these substitutions).

The first designation occurs first in position. If several items or characters have successive designations then all the first designations form the first word symbolic thread, and all the second designations form the second word symbolic thread etc. If an account has a quadruple designation and a double designation, the the double designation shows the first designation in the first and third threads and the second designation in the second and fourth threads of the account. 

A designating phrase cannot be a part of a multiple designation if it contains a pronoun imbalance since the substitution will then change the scripture and not make sense.. 

Past and Passive participles

These generally end in 'ed'. For example, 'Kicked' can be a past participle: We have kicked. Or it can be a passive participle: We were kicked. In general the verb 'to have' gives a past participle and the verb 'to be' gives a passive participle. A participle is a verb acting as an adjective. A Gerund is a participle acting as a noun. In the English language, only present participles can act as nouns (Driving is fun). Passive participles act as adjectives only in English. But in Greek passive participles can act as nouns (The Scorched [one] was sold last).

Example valid prophetic forms

The faithful steward, the discreet [one]
Lord! Lord!  (a repeated designation)
Moses! Moses!
Martha! Martha!
Nebuchadnezzar, the king
The King, Nebuchanezzar
Rebekah, a sister of Bethuel
A man, a householder
A maidservant, an Egyptian
Joseph, Son of David
Sarah, Abraham's wife
Jesus, Instructor!
Lord Jehovah, holy [one] of Israel (Hebrew)
The ram, one standing before the watercourse?
The Island, the [one] called Patmos
The 7 congregations, the [ones] in Asia
The false prophet, the one having deceived
Men of the city, men of Sodom
Angel of the God, the [one] travelling before army of Israel (Exodus 14)
The bull, the one
The bull, the other??
My lord, My brother (OK since both designations have the same pronoun)??
Father Abraham ('Father' is a noun!)
A son, a male (translating this as 'A male son' would be an insult to the reader)
Asenath, the daughter of Potiphera, the priest of On  (Asenath was not herself the priest of On, her father was. Potiphera is a possessive double designation - So the first thread has, Asenath, and the second has, the daughter of the priest of On)
James and John, the 2 sons of Zebedee
A ruler, a certain one [eiV]
A priest, a certain one [tiV]
Women, certain ones
A man, a certain one
A certain one, a man 
A Hostile (one), a man
The Hostile [one], the [one] having sown them
God, the [one] having given such [toiauthn] authority to men ['Such' is a pronoun imbalance. But there are no further verses in the account which mention God. So this is a double designation! If it was not then Matthew would count properly and therefore not be parallel]
The Son of me, the [one] having been chosen (Luke 9:35) [pronoun imbalance but no further substitutions]
Jehovah, God of your forefathers, God of Abraham, God of Isaac and God of Jacob [a quadruple designation] has sent me to you (Exodus 3:15 - NWT).
The holy (one), the truthful (one), the (one) having the key of David, the (one) opening up and no one will shut up, and shutting up and no one is opening [a quadruple designation] (Revelation 3:7 KIT)
The Amen, the witness, the faithful and the true [one], the beginning of the creation of God [a triple designation] (Revelation 3:14)

41 2 [ones] were debtors to a lender, a certain [one], the one owed 500 denarii, but the other for 50 [Classic Parable has 3 threads and 3 nouns!].(Luke 7:41)

The Dragon the great, the serpent the original, the [one] called [the] Devil and the Satan, the [one] misleading the entire inhabited earth [a quadruple designation] (Revelation12:9 NWT).

The last combination is the daddy of all successive designations. It is in fact the product of Jesus' sense of humour! The joke is that the phrase: The one called the Devil and Satan, which is actually declaring that it is giving us two designations in succession for Satan, is itself a successive designation for Satan! This sort of thing is a cryptic confirmation of the existence of the successive designation principle. The whole thing is rather like an Angus Deaton quiz show.

Consider the made up prophetic form:

The Dragon, the great [one], the hated [one], the lying [one], the [one] lying to everyone

This has a passive participle (Hated [one]) acting as a noun and a present participle (Lying [one]) acting as a noun. Both of these participles are therefore Gerunds. Finally it has 'the' acting as a noun through the implied '[one]'. The largest number of successive designations in the correct form that we have seen in the bible is 4. 

IN GENERAL, IF YOU CAN REMOVE ONE OF THE SUCCESSIVE DESIGNATIONS AND THE ACCOUNT STILL MAKES SENSE, THEN IT IS A SUCCESSIVE DESIGNATION

Not sure prophetic forms

A woman, but, a certain one (not successive but reads OK)
Men, Galilean [ones] (indefinite adjective but used substantively)

Example 1:

1 Belshazzar the king [aK'l.m;] made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand.
2 Belshazzar, while he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that the king and his lords, his wives and his concubines, might drink therefrom. (Daniel 5 ASV)

Word1 would read:

1 Belshazzar made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand.
2 Belshazzar, while he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that Belshazzar and his lords, his wives and his concubines, might drink therefrom. (Daniel 5 ASV)

Word2 would read:

1 The king made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand.
2 The King, while he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that The King and his lords, his wives and his concubines, might drink therefrom. (Daniel 5 ASV)

One interesting corollary of this is that one will never see a scripture like: King Belshazzar was hungry - in an account preceded by Belshazzar the king.. 
Because word2 would substitute to: King the king was hungry.- which would make no sense. Verse 9 literally says:

9 Then was the king [aK'l.m;], Belshazzar greatly troubled, and his countenance was changed in him, and his lords were perplexed. (Daniel 5 ASV)

Which is a further double designation which resets the substitution. It does not say: Then was King Belshazzar greatly troubled - as most translations put it. For that would substitute to be:

Then was King the King greatly troubled - which is nonsense.

2Peter 1:17 proves that double designations can have pronoun imbalances?

VatB, WHO, NA27, UBS4 have... 

17 For receiving honor and glory from God [the] Father such a voice/phrase being borne to him from the magnificent glory, "The son of me, the beloved of me, into whom I have delighted," (2Peter 1:17)
17 labwn gar para qeou patroj teimhn kai doxan fwnhj enecqeishj autw toiasde upo thj megaloprepouj doxhj o uioj mou o agaphtoj mou outoj estin eij on egw eudokhsa (2 Peter 1 Vatican B)

18 Yes, these words we heard borne from heaven while we were with him in the holy mountain [the transfiguration]. (2 Peter 1 NWT)

The Sinaiticus and various other codices follow Matthew 17:5 and Mark 9:7 with the words: the Son of me, the beloved [one], in whom I have delighted 

Nowhere in scripture other than 2Peter 1:17 is the voice of God quoted as saying 'the son of me, the beloved of me'. At the baptism of Jesus and at the transfiguration, we read 'the son of me, the beloved [one]. 

The fascinating thing about Peter's choice of words 'my Son my beloved', is that they have no pronoun imbalance and are therefore most certainly a double designation. Whereas 'my Son, the beloved' has a pronoun imbalance and therefore might not be a double designation and could also be read 'the beloved son of me' i.e. 'my beloved son' at a stretch. But Peter deliberately misquotes these words and by saying a voice or phrase such as 'my son. my beloved' is telling us that Matthew 17:5 and Mark 9:7 for the transfiguration and Matthew 3:17 and Mark 1:11 for the baptism are double designations. For they are a phrase, a prophetic form, such as 'my son, my beloved', which has no pronoun imbalance and therefore is a double designation.

L45794  fwnh,  fwnh  fwnh,, h`, (fa,w) a sound, tone, properly the sound of the voice, mostly of men, Lat. vox, Hom., etc.; of a battlecry, Xen.; fwnh.n r`hgnu,nai, Virgil's rumpere vocem, to utter an articulate sound, Hdt., Ar.; fÅ i`e,nai, Lat. vocem edere, Hdt., etc.: pl. ai` f. the tones of the voice, Plato:-proverb., fwnh/| o`ra/n, of a blind man, Sophocles.
2. the voice or cry of animals, Od., Heroditus., etc.
3. any articulate sound, as opposed to inarticulate (yo,foj), Sophocles., etc.
4. of sounds from inanimate objects, fÅ suri,ggwn Euripides.; ovrga,nwn Plato.
II. the faculty of speech, discourse, Lat. sermo, Sophocles.
2. language, Lat. lingua, Heroditus.
3. a kind of language, dialect, Aeschylus., Thucydides., etc.
III. a phrase, saying, th.n Simwni,dou f. Plato. Hence fwnh,eij 

There have to be 3 threads in the 3 parallel accounts of the transfiguration in Matthew 17:1-8 and Mark 9:2-8 and Luke 9:28-36, because the word 'tent' appears 3 times in total. So if there were two threads, then 'tent' would only ever mean a canvas temporary accommodation unit. 

Example invalid prophetic forms and pronoun imbalanced prophetic forms (potentially invalid if followed by a substitution of one of the words in the double designation later in the account which makes not sense as a result)

13 Then the disciples perceived that he spoke to them about [peri] John, the Baptist [this is not a double designation due to the ambiguity with John the brother of James, one of the 3 witnesses to the Transfiguration.. The scriptures are ONLY ambiguous when God designs them that way because both possible meanings are true in some thread of the account] (Matthew 17)

The famine, the that ('that' can be used as an adjective or a pronoun, but is not an adjective, it is a determinant)
Some of the men, the Galileans (some, all etc. are not nouns).
Against-the prophet, against-Moses
My servant, Moses (Pronoun imbalance)
Abraham, her husband (Pronoun imbalance)
to-Nebuchadnezzar, the king
The dragon (accusative), the serpent (nominative)
Lord, the God of us, the almighty (Pronoun imbalance)
The cows, the [ones] ascending after them (Pronoun imbalance)
The enemy, the [one] having sown them (Pronoun imbalance)
The woman, the this (pronoun imbalance)
The woman, this (pronoun imbalance)
This [one], the woman (pronoun imbalance)
A man there was, a householder (not successive)
A hostile [one], a man  (indefinite adjective, could be a hostile man)
The ram that you saw, [the] owner of the two horns (pronoun imbalance)
The soil, the fine (this is just the fine soil)
The dragon, the great (this is just the great dragon)
The serpent, the original (this is just the original serpent)
The heads of grain, the withered [ones] (this is the withered heads of grain)
The spirit, the unclean [one] (this is the unclean spirit)

When substituting single designations one must substitute the whole designation including the definite article (the) and the possessive operator (of). The single designation to be substituted must be in the same case as the substituting designation in Greek (or possibly just precisely the same word), unless the Greek word for the Designation is indeclinable. In Hebrew both the substituting word and the substituted word must be absolute or both must be construct (this does not apply to the successive designation itself). In Greek and in Hebrew both a definite designation cannot substitute an indefinite designation but an indefinite designation can substitute a definite one.

Hebrew nouns with the inseparable prepositions (k as, l to, b in, m from) cannot make successive designations because both designations would need to have the prepositional prefix and then the nouns would not be successive having a preposition between them. Hebrew nouns with pronominal suffixes (suffixes which are pronouns) cannot make successive designations because they are not plain nouns (we realised this when we saw that they do not work in Genesis 16 or Numbers 12). Or more likely because one designation is possessed by a pronoun and the other isn't. In the Greek too, if one designation has a pronoun and the other doesn't then the result is not a successive designation because the pronoun imbalance would introduce a possibly meaningless pronoun into sentences containing the designation without the pronoun, on substitution.

[[If the result of the substitutions has a double 'the', such as 'the the Nazarene', then one shortens this to 'the Nazarene'. One can justify this 'the the' fix on the basis that these substitutions on the double designations themselves always result in a repeated word or phrase which is similarly shortened to one recital. For example: Jesus, the Nazarene, becomes: The Nazarene, The Nazarene, which becomes: The Nazarene, in the second word thread, and becomes: Jesus, Jesus, which becomes: Jesus in the first word thread. Or one can justify it on the basis that in Greek, the the Nazarene means, the [one], the Nazarene, which means, the Nazarene.]]??? 

Invalid substitutions:
Mary (nominative) and Mary (vocative)
Jesus and 'of Jesus'
King (absolute) and King (construct)
King, the King

For example the successive designation: Nebuchadnezzar, the king, causes a substitution to occur in the phrase: The King was very pleased, but not in the phrase: Our king is wonderful (because 'the' is absent). 

The Successive Possessive Designations Principle

Successive designations can be possessive of course. Take the first verse in Matthew for example:

1 The book of the history of Jesus Christ, son of David, son of Abraham (Matthew 1).

Jesus, Christ, son of David, son of Abraham is a quadruple designation for our saviour. But all of the multiple designations are used as adjectives possessively describing the noun 'history'. So this is not a successive designation as we have defined that prophetic form. But it is nonetheless a multiple designation, so what should we do with it? Well we puzzled over this one for some time until the example in Matthew 1 above gave us the answer. Possessive successive designations do not create word symbolic threads as the non possessive ones do. But they do substitute as a successive designation does in the word symbolic threads that are created by the non possessive successive designations. In Matthew 1 there are two word symbolic threads which are created by the successive designations...

David, the king
Joseph, the husband of Mary
Jesus, the [one] called Christ.

So in Word 1 verse 1 is: 1 The book of the history of Jesus son of David, son of Abraham (Matthew 1).
Whereas in Word 2 it is: 1 The book of the history of Christ, son of David, son of Abraham (Matthew 1).

The 3rd and 4th designations for Jesus (son of David and son of Abraham) do not substitute since there is no 3rd of 4th word symbolic thread.

The Double Declaration Principle

There is a further prophetic form that works in the same way as a Successive Designation, we call it a Double Declaration. The Double Declaration Principle states that:

If any non trivial word is recited twice successively then the pair acts as a Successive Designation (even if it contains no nouns).

This is true because plainly the account reads sensibly with either one of the successive declarations missed out. Examples of this prophetic form are:

Truly, truly, I say to you
Impale [him], Impale [him]

Justification

So where is the scriptural justification for this outrageous scheme to pervert the scriptures and twist them to our taste, substituting holy words here there and everywhere in accordance with a scheme of men, the puritan asks, and rightly so. Do we not fall foul of the very last words in the book?

Well the last few verses of Revelation 22 have 4 word symbolic threads to them, since our sacrifice and saviour said:

16 I, Jesus, sent my angel to bear witness to you people of these things for the congregations. I am the root and the offspring of David, the star, the bright, the morning.

17 And the spirit and the bride keep on saying: Come! And let anyone hearing say: Come! And let anyone thirsting come; let anyone that wishes take life's water free.

18 I am bearing witness to everyone that hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone makes an addition to these [words], God will add to him the plagues that are written in this scroll,

19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the scroll of this prophecy, God will take his portion away from the trees of life and out of the holy city, of the things [good or plagues?] which are written about in this scroll (Revelation 22)

We looked at these verses in the 3rd proof of the symbolic structure principle above. Literally, for the literal meaning or the event symbolic meaning of an account, no words can be altered. Furthermore some words have been added and removed so that some people will get the plagues and lose their portion from the trees of life and the holy city. But in one of the word symbolic threads, the ambiguous verse 19 should be read:

19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the scroll of this prophecy, God will take his portion away of the [bad] things [the plagues] which are written about in this scroll, [which come] from the trees of life and out of the holy city (Revelation 22).

Now whereas 'the words of the prophecy of this scroll' stand for the literal and event symbolic meanings of the bible, 'the words of the scroll of this prophecy' stand for the word symbolic threads. So we can and do take away words from these threads and thereby avoid the plagues on Babylon and on mankind in general! (But we cannot add words to them). For the LWs are trees of life individually and a holy city collectively. 

Example 1

Let us apply the Successive Designations Principle to the following made up and non scriptural example:

Sarah, Abraham's wife went shopping with Hagar, the Egyptian..
Hagar picked up a nice cooking pot
Abraham's wife picked up a bag of rice
Sarah, Abraham's wife, paid for them
She then took her maidservant home
Hagar, the Egyptian boiled the rice in the pot
Her mistress gave the rice to Abraham
Abraham said: What a great meal my wife!
Sarah said: My maidservant cooked it.
Abraham said: My wife and Hagar work well together.

This splits into first and second Word Symbolic accounts as follows:

1st Word Symbolism (1st Word Symbolic thread):

Sarah, went shopping with Hagar
Hagar picked up a nice cooking pot
Sarah picked up a bag of rice
Sarah, paid for them
She then took Hagar home
Hagar, boiled the rice in the pot
Her mistress gave the rice to Abraham
Abraham said: What a great meal my wife!
Sarah said: My maidservant cooked it.
Abraham said: My wife and Hagar work well together.

2nd Word Symbolism (2nd word symbolic thread):

Abraham's wife went shopping with the Egyptian.
The Egyptian picked up a nice cooking pot
Abraham's wife picked up a bag of rice
Abraham's wife, paid for them
She then took the Egyptian home
The Egyptian boiled the rice in the pot
Her mistress gave the rice to Abraham
Abraham said: What a great meal!
Abraham's wife said: My maidservant cooked it.
Abraham said: My wife and the Egyptian work well together.

For the whole story on Genesis 16, the first part of the symbolic drama referred to by Paul in Galatians 4, please read [210]. If you actually try and write one of these you will see that the Successive Descriptions Principle is quite restrictive to what the account can say. We had to rewrite the above a few times to get it to work! The account must make sense with all of the substitutions. For example Abraham could not have said: Thanks Hagar! Because then in the second word symbolism he would have said: Thanks the Egyptian! which is nonsense! (Hebrew has no vocative, this problem would not occur in Greek due to the vocative case). So here at last is a grammatical proof of the bible code, and a test for canonicity. For more of this sort of thing - see [49].

The two great interpreters of dreams in the holy book are Joseph and Daniel. They are the two archetypical bible decoders. Get to know them and you get to know about this amazing code.

12 Forasmuch as an extraordinary spirit and knowledge and insight to interpret dreams and the explanation of riddles and the untying of knots had been found in him, in Daniel, whom the king himself named Belteshazzar. Now let Daniel himself be called, that he may show the very interpretation (Daniel 5).

Daniel chapter 5 has two designations for Belshazzar, the king of Babylon. These are: The King and Belshazzar. In each Word symbolic meaning, Belshazzar stands for someone, the king stands for someone else, and Belshazzar, the king is a double designation which stands for the symbolic meaning of 'Belshazzar' in the first word symbolism and the symbolic meaning of 'The king' in the second. If you do not realise this then the account is all tied up in a knot and you get nowhere. Once you do realise this, then you can untangle the account into its two different Word Symbolic strands. For our imperfect attempt at the untangling of Daniel 5, which you are unlikely to follow as yet! - see [164].

The classic example of Successive Designation Symbolism is Revelation 12. Here we read:

9 So [down] was hurled the dragon, the great, the serpent, the archaic, the one called Devil and the Satan, the one misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him (Revelations 12).

There are 4 designations for Satan in this one verse: 

The dragon, the great [one] i.e. the great dragon
the serpent, the archaic [one] i.e. the original serpent
the [one] called [the] Devil and the Satan (participle used as an adjective describing a state)
the [one] misleading the entire inhabited earth (participle used as an adjective describing an action). 

These are 4 valid designations for the same angel. 

We are not going into the symbolism of this chapter at this point, save but to point out that the dragon represents Satan's angelic administration over mankind, the serpent represents his corrupt members of God's true people (as in the original case of Eden), the Devil (meaning slanderer) is his earthly administration, and plain old Satan is plain old Satan (meaning resister). Bearing this symbolism in mind please read this:

15 And the serpent [true religious corruptor] disgorged water like a river from its mouth after the woman, to cause her to be drowned by the river.
16 But the earth came to the woman's help, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed up the river that the dragon disgorged from its mouth (Revelation 12).

Now you are beginning to pull this book apart, to untangle its knots, to decode it. There is a reason that the designation 'serpent' in verse 15 is changed to the designation 'dragon' in verse 16. For a fuller explanation of Revelation 12 - see U151.

1 For the kingdom of the heavens is like a man, a householder, who went out early in the morning to hire workers for his vineyard (Matthew 20).

So we have a man and a householder. Now the rest of the account refers variously to 'the man', 'the householder', and 'him'. So by the Successive Designations Principle we have two word symbolic threads to Matthew 20 - see [192].

Example 4

1 Now Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne him no children; but she had an Egyptian maidservant and her name was Hagar (Genesis 16).

The two successive designations for Sarah, means that there are two Word Symbolic threads in this account - see [210]

Example 5

42 And the Lord said: Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one, whom his master will appoint over his body of attendants to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time? (Luke 12).

o pistoV oikonomoV o fronimoV  (Luke 12)
The faithful steward,        the discreet [one]

The two successive designations for this steward means that there are two Word Symbolic threads in this account - see [34]. 

Example 6

11 Abraham, Abraham (Genesis 22)
2 Jacob, Jacob (Genesis 46)
13 Conspiracy, conspiracy! (2 Chronicles 23)
4 And he said: Moses, Moses (Exodus 3)
22 Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name (Matthew 7)

These double declarations work the same as your regular successive designations except that both successive designation are the same. They are merely a special case of Father, Abraham for example. 

So there are two further Abrahams, two further Jacobs, fathers of 12 tribes, two further impalements, two further conspiracies, two further Moses' etc. In the case of the impalement, the further two are represented by the two robbers impaled one on each side of Jesus. In the case of Moses, Jesus was one greater Moses, and there is another.

[C7a] The Descriptions Principle

If a character or item, represented by a countable noun, in an account makes two or more non successive appearances with differing descriptors, one of which can be no descriptor, (which descriptors can be adjectives or participles used as adjectives) then for each thread of the account each appearance in that thread takes a different meaning.

Example 1: The cows, fat cows, bad cows, good cows etc. of Genesis41. 

Jesus and Jesus the Galilean are two descriptions of Jesus. Jesus and Lord and the righteous [one] are two designations and a description of both designations. Jesus and Jesus of Nazareth are two descriptions of Jesus. 

[C7b] The Double Descriptions Principle

Definition: A Symbolic Meaning of a word, is a further meaning to the literal meaning which meaning is related to the literal meaning in a symbolic way

Definition: A Fulfilment of a symbolic meaning of a word, is a particular example of that symbolic meaning. 

Definition: A word symbolic thread of a scene/subaccount is a word symbolic meaning of the entire scene/sub account.

Definition: A further fulfilment of a word symbolic scene/subaccount is a second temporal occurrence of the word symbolic meaning of that scene/subaccount

The double or triple or quadruple description (which we use to mean two, three, four successive descriptions), is the second most important prophetic form in the bible (in the sense that it defines the number of fulfilments of the word symbolic threads defined by the successive designations principle). Here is the definition and the effect of this form... 

If a countable noun is described by two successive descriptors in the form 'noun descriptor and descriptor' (which descriptors are adjectives or participles used as adjectives), then all the word symbolic threads have two fulfilments to the entire thread. The first fulfilment temporally of the thread takes only the first description of the countable noun (first in position in the account as written) and substitutes all incidences of the second description (which occur after the double description), to be the first description (until any further successive description redefines these substitutions). The second fulfilment temporally of the thread takes only the second description of the countable noun (second in position in the account as written) and substitutes all incidences of the first description in the prophetic form (which occur in the account after the successive description) to be the second description (until any further successive description redefines these substitutions).

There can only be two successive descriptions not 3, due to the 2 sets of 6 layer show bread of Leviticus 24 - see c29.  

So there is no scripture of the form: noun adjective and adjective and adjective (or we would have 3 sets of showbread). This appears to be demonstrated by Genesis41

18 And here ascending from the river were 7 cows fat-fleshed and beautiful in form, and they began to feed among the reed/grass.
19 And here there were 7 other cows ascending after them, poor and bad/evil in form and thin-fleshed. For badness I have not seen the like of them in all the land of Egypt.
20 And the skinny and bad cows began to eat up the first 7 fat cows (Genesis 41)

This has a triple description of the 7 bad cows, but it is not in the form noun adjective and adjective and adjective. Whereas the double description: skinny and fat cows - is in the correct prophetic form. 

A double description cannot have a pronoun imbalance for the same reasons that a double designation cannot have one, namely one of the substitutions could introduce a meaningless pronoun into the account.

Example prophetic forms

The faithful and discreet slave (literally: the faithful slave and discreet)
Wicked and adulterous generation
A thief and a plunderer (literally: thief is and plunderer)
The brother of James and John
7 heads of grain, [ones] withered and thin [ones] and [ones] scorched
The God and father of him (The God of him and the father of him)
Lord of Lords and King of Kings
Fire-red and hyacinth-blue and sulphur-yellow breastplates
The law of sin and of death

The famous example is 'The faithful and discreet slave' of Matthew 24:45. The one word symbolic thread, has two fulfilments which relate to two slaves, a faithful slave and a discreet slave. The two descriptors 'faithful' and 'discreet' define two separate slaves in two separate fulfilments of the one word symbolic meaning - see [34].

45 Who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over his domestics, to give them their food at the proper time? (Matthew 24).

o pistoV doulos kai fronimoV (Matthew 24)
The faithful slave and discreet

Example 2

33 So now let Pharaoh look for a man discreet and wise and set him over the land of Egypt (Genesis 41).

This was Joseph in the literal meaning, who is described successively as being discreet and wise. In the word symbolic meanings a greater land of Egypt has two further rulers, a discreet one and a wise one - see [304].

Example 3

2 And here ascending out of the river Nile were 7 cows beautiful in appearance and fat-fleshed, and they went feeding among the Nile grass.
3 And here there were seven other cows ascending after them out of the river Nile, ugly in appearance and thin-fleshed, and they took their stand alongside the cows by the bank of the river Nile (Genesis 41).

Joseph gave us the meaning of the literal dream in the same chapter, which meaning is in fact the event symbolic meaning. He revealed that we should take a cow for a year in that case. But both sets of 7 cows are described successively in two ways: beautiful and fat, ugly and thin. So there are two fulfilments of the cows in this dream in the one word symbolic thread. We have a reasonable but somewhat outdated understanding of this account - see [304].

[C7c] The Successive Articulations Principle

If a phrase containing a verb is successively articulated (the two articulations being separated by either nothing or by the word 'and'), then there are two greater meanings to the articulation which appear to be either a fundamental part of the bible code or fundamental to church doctrine and prophecy

Compare this with Joseph's explanation of the meaning of a dream repeated twice (firmly established and speeding to do it).

32 And the fact that the dream was repeated to Pharaoh twice means that the thing is firmly established on the part of the [true] God, and the [true] God is speeding to do it. (Genesis 41 NWT)

Example 1

8 Now come, write it upon a tablet with them, and inscribe it even in a book, that it may serve for a future day, for a witness to time indefinite (Isaiah 30).

17 By the decree of watchers the thing is, and [by] the saying of holy ones the request is (Daniel 4).

We are being told successively in two synonymous ways that the angels decreed this one.

3 Will two walk together unless they have met by appointment?

4 Will a lion roar in a forest when it has no prey?
Will a young maned lion give forth its voice from its hiding place if it has caught nothing at all?

5 Will a bird fall into a trap on the earth when there is no snare for it?
Does a trap go up from the ground when it has absolutely caught nothing?

6 If a horn is blown in a city, do not also the people themselves tremble? 
If a calamity occurs in the city is it not also Jehovah who has acted/caused [it]?

7 For the sovereign Lord Jehovah will not do a thing unless he has revealed his confidential matter/secret to his servants, the prophets

8 There is a lion that has roared! Who will not be afraid?
The sovereign Lord Jehovah himself has spoken who will not prophesy? (Amos 3)

Example 4

21 And Jehovah God proceeded to make long garments of skin for Adam and for his wife and to clothe them (Genesis 3).

The literal meaning is that God was their tailor. One consequence of this is that it is not a sin for women to wear fur coats. Beautiful women who wear fur coats are hated because of Jealousy, not because an animal has been killed purely for its skin. Remember that Adam and Eve were vegetarians when God killed the animal for it's skin to clothe them. But the concept of clothing them is repeated, being recited first in terms of making long garments. So there is a greater way in which God clothed them. This greater way was that he created new bodies for them which instead of being indefinitely long lasting bodies which did not age, as were their previous bodies in the garden, were just long lasting, and were ageing. Adam lived for 930 years (Genesis 5:5). So these new ageing bodies, shorter versions of which we all inhabit today, were their long garments of skin as it were.

Example 5

8 However, let this one fact not be escaping your notice, beloved ones, that one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day (2 Peter 3).

In the literal meaning, God lives forever, and so to him one day is just like 1,000 years. But this phrase is repeated, and so by the Successive Articulation Principle, there is a greater way in which one day is as 1,000 years to God. This greater way is that one day represents 1,000 years in some scriptures. For example the Kingdom of God is a Sabbath which lasts for 1,000 years. 

6 And you must lie upon your right side in the second case, and you must carry the error of the house of Judah forty days. A day for a year, a day for a year, is what I have given you (Ezekiel 4).

In the literal meaning, the 40 days of Ezekiel's laying on his right side represents 40 years or error of the house of Judah. But in the greater meaning, we know that the phrase: 'A day for a year' has a greater meaning. This meaning is that God has given 'a day for a year' to all would be Ezekiel's, 'prophets' who want to interpret the bible. A day for a year is an acceptable substitution and may give you the correct interpretation of any scripture in the symbolic meaning. It is a symbolism that God uses, we are being told.

Example 6 

6 Into their intimate group do not come, O my soul. With their congregation do not become united, O my disposition, because in their anger they killed men, and in their arbitrariness they hamstrung bulls.
7 Cursed be their anger, because it is cruel, and their fury, because it acts harshly. Let me parcel them out in Jacob and let me scatter them in Israel (Genesis 49).
11 Tying his full-grown ass to a vine and the descendant of his own she-ass to a choice vine, he will certainly wash his clothing in wine and his garment in the blood of grapes (Genesis 49).

Example 7 

12 The error of Ephraim is wrapped up, his sin is treasured up (Hosea 13).

[C7d] The Successive Alternatives Principle

If an account contains a series of successive alternatives, then each alternative must occur at least once in one thread. Each alternative must be realised in one or other meaning of the account.

Example 1

See 'tribulation or persecution' in the accounts of the sower - see U63. 

Example 2

35 Therefore keep on the watch for you do not know when the master of the house is coming, whether late in the day (the first watch of the night) or at midnight (the second watch) or at cockcrowing (the third watch) or early in the morning (the fourth watch) (Mark 13).

See 'whether late in the day (the first watch of the night) or at midnight (the second watch) or at cockcrowing (the third watch) or early in the morning (the fourth watch). ' in the account of the slaves appointed by the master - see U34.

[C7e] The Repeated Articulation Principle

If a verbal phrase is articulated twice non successively (separated by a word other than 'and') in one account, then it takes a greater meaning different from the literal meaning in all the word symbolic threads of the account. This greater meaning is a key symbolism in the word symbolic threads. (And there must be at least one word symbolic thread).

Example 1

10 These generations/descendents of Shem. Shem son of 100 years and fathered Arpachshad 2 years after the deluge.
11 And lived Shem, after his fathering Arpachshad 500 years. And fathered sons and daughters.

12 And Arpachshad life [yx a noun] 35 year. Then he became father to Shelah.
13 And after his fathering Shelah, Arpachshad continued to live 3 years and 400 year. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.

This means shem fathered Arpachshad and Arpchshad fathered Shelah is a second manner. See U102.

[C7f] GrammatoV, its a grammatical code

27 And the uncircumcised [person] that is such by nature will, by carrying out the Law, judge you who with its written code [grammatoV] and circumcision are a transgressor of law (Romans 2).
29 But he is a Jew who is one on the inside, and [his] circumcision is that of the heart by spirit, and not by a written
code [grammatoV]. The praise of that one comes, not from men, but from God (Romans 2).

6 who has indeed adequately qualified us to be ministers of a new covenant, not of a written code [grammatoV], but of spirit; for the written code [grammatoV] condemns to death, but the spirit makes alive (2 Corinthians 3).

Paul is saying that literally the law was a 'grammar'. But then a grammar is the code of a language. Now using the bible code itself we see that the greek word 'grammatoV' appears only twice in each of the accounts at Romans 2 and at 2Corinthians 3, so by the repetition principle below, there is a greater GrammatoV, than the law of Moses. There is a greater grammar to the bible. This greater grammar is the grammatical bible code, the grammar of the symbolism of the bible, a symbolic grammar if you like. The point is that these two accounts are both saying that the bible code is a grammatical code. And this indeed is what we have discovered. In a nutshell...

The designations principle and the successive designations principle are the symbolic grammar of the nouns
The descriptions principle and the successive descriptions principle are the symbolic grammar of the adjectives
The articulations principle and the successive articulations principle are the symbolic grammar of the verbs

[C8] The Noun Counting Principle

Definition: The literal meaning of an account OR the event symbolic meaning of an account AND every word symbolic meaning of an account combine to make the total number of threads or strands or meanings of that account..

A literal account has a literal thread and may have between one and four word symbolic threads. A non literal account, such as a parable, a vision or a dream, has an event symbolic thread and may also have between one and four word symbolic threads. No section of any account has both a literal thread and an event symbolic thread, although an interpretation has one thread which is both literal in some places and event symbolic in others (but not both at once). 

All bible accounts obey the following noun count rule of the countable nouns which are defined to be the nouns which are acting as nouns (not as possessive adjectives). These nouns define the word symbolism of the word symbolic threads. 

The total number of meanings that a countable noun takes in all the threads of an account is the highest factor of the number of recitals of that noun in the account, which is less than or equal to the number of threads.

If a countable noun has two literal meanings such as the word 'dead' in the scripture: let the [judicially] dead bury the [physically] dead, or such as the Hebrew word for woman (Xya), which also means 'man' in Deuteronomy 25 etc., then one may have to subtract 1 from the word symbolic meanings from the table above. We are not yet sure about that.

Adjectives have symbolic meanings which are generally dominated by the nouns they describe.
Verbs have symbolic meanings which are generally dominated by nouns.
Adverbs, pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions, etc. are invariant in all symbolisms. They have symbolic meanings which are merely their literal meanings.

Nouns used possessively, such as the word 'Abraham', in the phrase Abraham's wife, do not count as nouns since they are being used as possessive adjectives.

Specifically, since this is a grammatical code...

1. Any noun at all in the genitive in Greek which is being used as an adjective is not counted. Eg: 'Hearing of my words', 'Having occurred of flood' uses 'words' and 'flood' possessively. 'The [one] of Zebedee' uses 'Zebedee' possessively. 'He came into contact with the coffin' has coffin in the genitive in Luke 7, but the genitive case can be used for the ablative in Greek (wonderful isn't it?). So 'coffin' is not used possessively in that case. 

2. Nouns in the genitive due to prepositions such as epi, apo are counted 

3. Quantifiers such as: Half of (the earth), a 3rd of (the earth) a quarter of (the earth), all of (the earth), every of (the people), one of (the prophets) etc do not turn nouns into adjectives, so the nouns still count even if they are in the genitive (except 'all of' in Hebrew - see 5.). 

4. Any noun which is in the absolute preceded by a construct state (and therefore is a possessive adjective) in the Hebrew is not counted. The Hebrew 'construct' '-la' meaning 'to', being the 'construct' of 'la', meaning 'towards', which is a preposition, does not turn a noun into a possessive adjective (we think due to 'Joseph' in Genesis 40). In fact as is the case in Greek, no Hebrew preposition in the construct makes its absolute noun into a possessive adjective and therefore makes it uncountable.  

5. The construct '-lk', meaning all of, or the whole of, being the proper construct of '-llk', meaning 'to complete', which is not a preposition, does turn a noun into a possessive adjective. 

6. As in the case of successive designations, Hebrew nouns with pronoun suffixes (husband-of-her, maidservant-of-me etc.) are not countable 'because they are not plain nouns'. In general Hebrew Prepositions which are in the construct state, do not cause the succeeding absolute to be a genitive. 

7. The words: Jehovah and God only ever mean Jehovah and God, for any further meaning would be symbolic idolatry!

It is important to realise that the number of recitals of a noun used as a noun governs the number of symbolic meanings that it takes in the different threads, but does not govern the number of fulfilments of these symbolic meanings that it might take. The number of fulfilments is determined by the Successive Descriptions Principle.

[C9] The No Coincidences Principle

20 As regards whatever our hearts may condemn us in, because God is greater than our hearts and knows all things (1 John 3).

3 Will two walk together unless they have met by appointment?

i.e. are there any coincidences in God's actions, and therefore in the bible?

4 Will a lion roar in a forest when it has no prey?
Will a young maned lion give forth its voice from its hiding place if it has caught nothing at all?

These two lines are saying the same thing, and it is not a coincidence

5 Will a bird fall into a trap on the earth when there is no snare for it?
Does a trap go up from the ground when it has absolutely caught nothing?

These two lines are saying the same thing, and it is not a coincidence

6 If a horn is blown in a city, do not also the people themselves tremble? 
If a calamity occurs in the city is it not also Jehovah who has acted/caused [it]?

The horn was blown when a calamity was about to occur as a warning. God is indirectly behind everything.

7 For the sovereign Lord Jehovah will not do a thing unless he has revealed his confidential matter/secret to his servants, the prophets (Amos 3:3-7).

This applies to calamities on cities of his people. So he warns us all through his prophets, in a secret way, using apparent coincidences. But at the end of the day in the bible if two walk together then it is not a coincidence it is by appointment.  

18 And Jehovah God went on to say: It is not good for the man to continue by himself. I am going to make a helper for him, as a complement of him (Genesis 2).

26 But the helper, the holy spirit, which the Father will send in my name, that one will teach you all things and bring back to your minds all the things I told you (John 14).

26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4:26).

So the Jerusalem above is God's wife obviously, and so it is the Holy spirit. But the Jerusalem above is just God's administration of all of his loyal heavenly people. Just as the Jerusalem below was his administration of all of his loyal earthly people at one time. So the Holy spirit is all of God's holy angels, it is all of the holy spirits. So there it is, the precise identity of the Holy Spirit, from the No Coincidence Principle.

26 In like manner the spirit also joins in with help for our weakness; for the [problem of] what we should pray for as we need to we do not know, but the spirit itself pleads for us with groanings unuttered (Romans 8:26).

5 And the thing spoken was pleasing to the whole multitude, and they selected Stephen, a man full of faith and holy spirit, and Philip and Prochorus and Nicanor and Timon and Parmenas and Nicolaus, a proselyte of Antioch (Acts 6).

6 Still, you do have this, that you hate the deeds of the sect of Nicolaus, which I also hate (Revelation 2).

[C10] The Prophetic Times Substitution Principle, the Generalisation of Daniel4

Take 7 days a day for a year and you get 7 years.
Take 7 years a day for a year and you get 7 days.

In the first phrase we substituted a day to be a year. In the second we substituted a year to be a day. These are the two meanings of the phrase: A day for a year, a day for a year. The twin recital is telling us that the substitution can work either way in the greater meaning. In Daniel4 we take a day to be a year - see U120. In 1Samuel11 we take a year to be a day - see U271c.

We read in Revelation 12:

14 But the two wings of the great eagle were given the woman, that she might fly into the wilderness to her place; there is where she is fed for a time and times and half a time away from the face of the serpent (Revelation 12).

6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and sixty days (Revelation 12).

In Daniel chapter 4, Nebuchadnezzar, who is the King of Babylon and the King of God's people the Jews, who are prisoners in Babylon, is removed from his throne for a period of 'seven times' and then he is re instated as King. The phrase ‘seven times’ appears 4 times in the account:

16 Let its heart be changed from that of mankind, and let the heart of a beast be given to it, and let 7 times pass over it (Daniel 4).

11 And they began to question him, saying: Why do the scribes say that first Elijah must come?
12 He said to them: Elijah does come first and restore all things; but how is it that it is written respecting the Son of man that he must undergo many sufferings and be treated as of no account? (Mark 9).

The History of the First Bible Key

10 For upon you men Jehovah has poured a spirit of deep sleep, and he closes your eyes, the prophets, and he has covered even your heads, the visionaries. 
11 And for you men the vision of everything becomes like the words of a book, that has been sealed up, which they give to someone knowing writing saying: Read this out loud, please. And he has to say: I am unable for it is sealed up. 
12 And the book must be given to someone that does not know writing, saying: Read this out loud please. And he has to say: I do not know writing at all (Isaiah 29).

The Great Prophetic Times Periods

The rest of our early understandings, many of which were wrong, are in 'Letter to the Society'.

The Blindness of the Watchtower

4 Nevertheless I hold this against you, that you lost the love you had at first (Revelation 2).

10 You are my witnesses, is the utterance of Jehovah: Even my servant whom I have chosen, in order that you may know and have faith in me, and that you may understand that I am the same One. Before me there was no God formed, and after me there continued to be none.
11 I--I am Jehovah, and besides me there is no saviour.
12 I myself have told forth and have saved and have caused [it] to be heard, when there was among you no strange [god]. So you are my witnesses, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I am God (Isaiah 43)

18 Hear, you deaf ones; and look forth to see, you blind ones.
19 Who is blind, if not my servant, and who is deaf as my messenger whom I send? Who is blind as the one rewarded, or blind as the servant of Jehovah?
20 It was a case of seeing many things, but you did not keep watching. It was a case of opening the ears, but you did not keep listening (Isaiah 42).

37 And he came and found them sleeping, and he said to Peter: Simon, are you sleeping? Did you not have strength to keep on the watch one hour? (Mark 14).

The work in which the Lord has been pleased to use our humble talents has been less a work of origination than of reconstruction, adjustment, harmonisation (Kingdom Proclaimers).

36 And he went on to say: Abba, Father, all things are possible to you; remove this cup from me. Yet not what I want, but what you want (Mark 14).

"The way to test your interpretation, is not against doctrines of churches but against all other scriptures relating to the subject matter of your interpretation. When you have harmonised them all then you have God’s interpretation."  

[C11] The Numerical Principle and the Times Principle

14 And God went on to say: Let luminaries come to be in the expanse of the heavens to make a division between the day and the night; and they must serve as signs and for seasons and for days and years (Genesis 1).

11 Accordingly Gad went in to David and said to him: This is what Jehovah has said: Take your pick, 
12 whether for three years there is to be a famine, or for three months there is to be a sweeping away from before your adversaries and for the sword of your enemies to overtake [you], or for three days there is to be the sword of Jehovah, even pestilence, in the land, with Jehovah's angel bringing ruin in all the territory of Israel. And now see what I should reply to the One sending me (1 Chronicles 21).

As regards the baker:
18 Then Joseph answered and said: This is its interpretation: The 3 baskets are 3 days (Genesis 40).

26 The 7 good cows are 7 years. Likewise the 7 good ears of grain are 7 years. The dream is but one (Genesis 41).

Well a cubit is a measure of length, but Jesus here uses it as a time. He is in fact giving us the numerical principle of bible interpretation. He who is anxious about the things of the Lord, a son of Mary, one who pays attention even to one cubit, the height of the Tsohar, realises that it adds something to the lifespan of the sons of Adam. In fact it takes one day (a day for a cubit) to be raptured out of the ark.

Examples

1. The 1.1 million men drawing sword of 1Chronicles21 stand for 1.1 million BLC days of 1AC entry from the presentation of the census to David on 1048Nisan14 BC, the start of the 3 day plague to 1048Nisan16, when David purchased the temple floor from Ornan the Jebusite and stopped the plague. Although actually the plague ended after 70,000 people had been killed by it in circumstance where their redemption value was the debt owed by the people to Jehovah for not paying the half shekel per head registration tax of Exodus 30:11-16 on 1.57 million people. 1048Nisan16 was 3 Prophetic Times of the Temple Times before Jesus rebuilt his temple on 33Nisan16. 

5 Joab now gave the number of the registration of the people to David; and all Israel amounted to 1,100,000 men drawing sword, and Judah 470,000 men drawing sword (1 Chronicles 21).

So 1.1 million BLC days would take us to 2008Heshvan6. But entrance into the 1AC ended on 2008Nisan21 the last day before the marriage of Jesus to his first presence wife on 2008Nisan22, and the last day of the week of Daniel9 during which God has to keep the covenant of the 1AC in force because Michael's lease over Adam (which is the basis of his salvation of Adam) ended on 2008Nisan14. So there are a further 195 days of 1AC entry which are not covered during this period. These are the 195 days of Kingdom 1AC entry for OMC sealing (rather than FRC sealing). They run from 2022Adar19 to 2023Tishri3/4 - see U154. For more on the 1Chronicles21 - see U40.

The chariots are charging through the scriptures. The are ridden by research groups. The holy spirit needing 2 or 3 gathered together (riding in a chariot). The wheels of the chariot are the old form of locomotion, the old form of bible interpretation. These charioteers must adopt the new LW and bible code methods of interpretation and throw away their old interpretational methodology.3. The Feeding of the 5,000 in Mark6  For more see U67.

4. Pharaoh's Dream (7 fat cows and 7 thin cows from river, both stand on bank beside each other)

[C12] The Jigsaw Principle of the Code

Charles Russell's Extinguishing of the Fires of Hell using the Jigsaw Principle

A God that would use his power to create human beings whom he foreknew and pre-destinated should be eternally tormented, could be neither wise, just nor loving. His standard would be lower than that of many men (Kingdom Proclaimers).

Hell, Gehenna:

6 And he himself made his own sons pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom, and practiced magic and used divination and practiced sorcery and made spiritistic mediums and professional foretellers of events. He did on a grand scale what was bad in the eyes of Jehovah, to offend him (2 Chronicles 33).

31 And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, in order to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, a thing that I had not commanded and that had not come up into my heart.
32 Therefore, look! days are coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, when it will no more be said [to be] Topheth and the valley of the son of Hinnom, but the valley of the killing; and they will have to bury in Topheth without there being enough place (Jeremiah 7).

Scriptures which indicate that we do roast in Hell:

43 And if ever your hand makes you stumble, cut it off; it is finer for you to enter into life maimed than with two hands to go off into Gehenna, into the fire that cannot be put out (Mark 9).

10 And the Devil who was misleading them was hurled into the lake of fire and sulphur, where both the wild beast and the false prophet [already were]; and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever (Revelation 20).

Scriptures which indicate that we don't roast in Hell:

5 For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten (Ecclesiastes 9).

3 Do not put your trust in nobles, Nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.
4 His spirit goes out, he goes back to his ground; In that day his thoughts do perish (Psalm 146).

For the rest of this Jigsaw please see [13a].

[i] The sacred Scriptures be the property of the people, and one which no party should be allowed to wrest from them.

[ii] The authority of the Scriptures is independent on any other authority, and is preferable to every other writing, but especially to the books of the church of Rome. 

[iii] It is impossible for any part of the Holy Scriptures to be wrong. In Holy Scripture is all the truth, one part of Scripture explains another.

English Sheriffs were forced to take an oath to persecute the Lollards, and the Justices must deliver a relapsed heretic to be burned within 10 days of his accusation (Armitage a History of the Baptists, 1890, I, p323).

All who read the scriptures in their mother tongue should: Forfeit land, cattle, life and goods from the heirs for ever !! (Eadie: History of the English Bible).

A thorough search in the parish twice a year, for all persons that: Hold any either heresies or errors, or have any suspected books in the English tongue (Blackburn, History of the Christian Church 1880 p346).

However Wycliffe himself had the support of Queen Joan (1328-1385), of Queen Ann (the wife of Richard II), and ultimately of God himself:

In May 1382, Wycliffe was called before yet another synod of ecclesiastical authorities. This is called the Blackfriars Synod, because it was held in the monastery of Blackfriars in London. When the 47 Bishops and monks and religious doctors took their seats, a powerful earthquake shook the city. Huge stones fell out of the castle walls and pinnacles toppled (John Wycliffe and the Lollards - Fundamental Baptist Information Service).

Wycliffe's argument to the Catholic authorities for translating the bible into English was as follows:

You say it is heresy to speak of the Holy Scriptures in English. You call me a heretic because I have translated the Bible into the common tongue of the people. Do you know whom you blaspheme? Did not the Holy Ghost give the Word of God at first in the mother tongue of the nations to whom it was addressed ? (Fountain, John Wycliffe)

The Council of Constance declared Wycliffe a heretic on 4 May 1415, and banned his writings, effectively both excommunicating him retroactively and making him an early forerunner of Protestantism. The Council decreed that Wycliffe's works should be burned and his bodily remains removed from consecrated ground. This order, confirmed by Pope Martin V, was carried out in 1428. Wycliffe's corpse was exhumed and burned and the ashes cast into the River Swift, which flows through Lutterworth. 

In 1506 William Tylsworth was burned for his faith in the Word of God and his own daughter was forced to ignite the fire. In 1519 six men and a woman were burned for:

Teaching their children the Lord's Prayer and the ten commandments in English (Eadie: History of the English Bible).

The Lollard's Tower, where people possessing an English bible were tortured and killed, still exists today in Lambeth Palace, the London home of the Archbishop of Canterbury. But despite all of this persecution, Wycliffe's bible was still being read at the time of the next great bible translator William Tyndale (1484 - 1536), the Father of what eventually became the King James Bible. He studied classics and theology both Magdalen Hall Oxford from 1506 to 1515 and at Cambridge from 1517-1521. Whereas the writer studied Natural Sciences and Pure Mathematics at Magdalene College Cambridge from 1975-1979 and Magdalen College Oxford in 1979. Tyndale's first translation had to be finished abroad, but 3,000 copies reached England in December 1526. Around 1522 after he left Cambridge he famously said in response to a Catholic friar as quoted in "The acts and monuments of John Foxe": :

"If God spare my life, ere many years I will cause a boy who driveth the a plough to know more of the scriptures than you do."

The persecution then continued. John Tewkesbury had been reading Wycliffe's bible since 1512, and had obtained a copy of the Tyndale New Testament in 1526. He was first arrested in April 1529 and tortured and crippled. He was finally burned on December 20th 1530 for: Distributing copies of the word of God and believing in salvation by faith in Christ alone  (www.whidbey.net/~dcloud/articles/williamtyndale.htm). 

Tyndale was imprisoned in May 1535. Whilst he was in prison, three editions of his new testament were printed. He was strangled and the burnt at the stake on October 6th 1536. At his death he prayed out loud:

Lord open the King of England's Eyes !

On October 4, 1535 John Rogers and Miles Coverdale who were loyal disciples of Tyndale, finished Tyndale's translation of the Old Testament into English and printed abroad the first complete English Bible, known as the Coverdale Bible. John Rogers then changed his name to Thomas Matthew (an interesting name for a bible translator!) and printed the Coverdale Bible again, under this nom de plume, since Tyndale's work was banned. This edition is called the Matthews Bible

In 1539, 3 years after Tyndale was executed, his spoken prayer was answered. Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Cantebury, hired Miles Coverdale, at the bequest of King Henry VIII to publish what was called the Great Bible. 

These were Tyndale's words as a prologue for his translation of Jonah:

As the envious Philistines stopped the wells of Abraham, and filled them up with earth, to put the memorial out of mind, to the intent that they might challenge the ground; even so the fleshly minded hypocrites stop up the veins of life, which are the scripture, with the earth of their traditions, false similitudes and lying allegories. And that, of like zeal, to make the scripture their own possession and merchandise. And so shut up the kingdom which is in God's word, neither entering in themselves, nor suffering them that would. (Willam Tyndale) 

The Geneva Bible was the first Bible to add verses to the chapters, so that referencing specific passages would be easier. Every chapter was also accompanied by extensive marginal notes and references so thorough and complete that the Geneva Bible is also considered the first English "Study Bible". William Shakespeare quotes thousands of times in his plays from the Geneva translation of the Bible. The Geneva Bible became the Bible of choice for over 100 years of English speaking Christians. Between 1560 and 1644 at least 144 editions of this Bible were published. Examination of the 1611 King James Bible shows clearly that its translators were influenced much more by the Geneva Bible, than by any other source. The Geneva Bible itself retains over 90% of William Tyndale's original English translation. The Geneva in fact, remained more popular than the King James Version until decades after its original release in 1611! The Geneva holds the honor of being the first Bible taken to America, and the Bible of the Puritans and Pilgrims.

The King James Bible, although the work of 50 scholars, is very close to Tyndale's original Translation:

In the Gospel of St. Mark and the Epistle to the Hebrew there are not more than 80 words (in Tyndale's translation) ... which are not found in our Authorised Version of the Bible (Moulton - History of the English Bible).

Everybody that could bought the book or busily read it or got others to read it to them if they could not themselves, and divers more elderly people learned to read on purpose. And even little boys flocked among the rest to hear portions of the holy Scripture read.

[C13] Binary (Yes/No) Question Principle

Examples

4 Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born when he is old? He cannot enter into the womb of his mother a second time and be born, can he? (John 3)

That is also how one is born again non adamically. We become the child we would have been if Adam and Eve had not sinned. In other words we become the child that would have been born to the non adamic versions of our parents. So we effectively enter into the womb of our mother a second time, after she has been gene zapped. Essentially every cell in your body goes back to the womb and is gene zapped and reborn as the non adamic version of yourself. 

6 What has been born from the flesh is flesh, and what has been born from the spirit is spirit (John 3).

39 Nicodemus also, the man that came to him in the night the first time, came bringing a roll of myrrh and aloes, about 100 pounds [of it].
40 So they took the body of Jesus and bound it up with bandages with the spices, just the way the Jews have the custom of preparing for burial (John 19)

50 Nicodemus, who had come to him previously, and who was one of them, said to them:
51 Our law does not judge a man unless first it has heard from him and come to know what he is doing, does it?
52 In answer they said to him: You are not also out of Galilee, are you? Search and see that no prophet is to be raised up out of Galilee (John 7).

2 But John, having heard in jail about the works of the Christ, sent by means of his own disciples 
3 and said to him: Are you the Coming one, or are we to expect a different one? (Matthew 11)

19 So John summoned a certain two of his disciples and sent them to the Lord to say: Are you the Coming one or are we to expect a different one? (Luke 7).

5 For instance, which is easier, to say: Your sins are forgiven, or to say: Get up and walk? (Matthew 9)

9 Which is easier, to say to the paralytic: Your sins are forgiven, or to say: Get up and pick up your bed and walk? (Mark 2)

33 Who will file accusation against God's chosen ones? God is the One who declares [them] righteous (Romans 8).

And Pilate enquired of Jesus:  Are you the king of the Jews? (Mark 15:2).

36 Jesus answered: My kingdom is no part of this world [it is in the ark and in the next world]. If my kingdom were part of this world, my attendants would have fought that I should not be delivered up to the Jews. But, as it is, my kingdom is not from this source (John 18).

38 So Pharaoh said to his servants: Can another man be found like this one in whom the spirit of God is? (Genesis 41)

10 For those who are dead will you show a marvel? [1st death: No] [Judicially dead but physically alive: Yes. Second dead: Yes]
Or will the Rephaim arise praising you? Selah [Even the Rephaim, the giant Canaanite enemies of Israel: No, for the most part] [But Yes, for some of them]
11 Will your loving-kindness be declared in the grave itself? [In Hades: No] [In Gehenna: Yes] 
Your faithfulness in [the place of] destruction? [In Hades: No] [In Gehenna: Yes]
12 Will a marvel by you be known in the darkness itself? [No, not in Hades. Because the 1st dead are conscious of nothing being asleep] [Yes, in Gehenna, where you can see what you wish to see some of the time, the marvels of the kingdom will be known]
Or your righteousness in the land of forgetfullness/oblivion? [No, not in Hades] [Yes, in Gehenna] (Psalm 88).

The binary question principle of the code REQUIRES both answers to be true. 

[C13a] The Question Answering Principle

Any question asked in a bible account is answered somewhere in that account - somehow - often in the very verse that asks the question!

Example 1

4 Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born when he is old? He cannot enter into the womb of his mother a second time and be born, can he? (John 3)

That is how one is born again non adamically. We become the child we would have been if Adam and Eve had not sinned. In other words we become the child that would have been born to the non adamic versions of our parents. So we effectively enter into the womb of our mother a second time, after she has been gene zapped. Essentially every cell in your body goes back to the womb and is gene zapped and reborn as the non adamic version of yourself. 

Example 2

For how long will your people refuse to keep my laws?

28 Consequently Jehovah said to Moses: How long must you people refuse to keep my commandments and my laws?
29 Mark the fact that Jehovah has given you the Sabbath (Exodus 16)

Doh! We refuse to keep his commandments until the Kingdom of God which is the great Sabbath after the 6,000 year working week.

Example 3

19 But the [one] said to them in-response: Oh faithless generation, how long must I continue with you? How long must I put up with you? [the account will answer this question] Bring him to me (Mark 9).

The sentence count of everything that befell the son possessed by the epileptic demon of 50x gives the number of years that Jesus had to put up with that generation from 29Tishri10, his baptism by John, to 79Tishri14, the end of the first presence. It also proves that his first presence lasts less than a generation! - For more see U702.

Example 4

[C13b] Multiple Options/Outcomes Principle

Any account which contains multiple options or outcomes has all the options or outcomes fulfilled in the greater meanings which were not fulfilled in the literal meanings.

For example in 1Kings18 the contest between Jehovah and Baal is who can answer with fire? In the literal account Jehovah sends it. In the greater meaning Baal sends it and God predicts when.

24 And you must call upon the name of your God, and I, for my part, shall call upon the name of Jehovah; and it must occur that the God that answers by fire is the [true] God. To this all the people answered and said: The thing is good. (1 Kings 18 NWT)

Elijah prayed for God to answer me, answer me, not for God to burn my bull, bur n my bull! So God answers Elijah4 with the correct prediction date, but Baal sends the fire of the terrorist attack.

10 Go, and you must speak to David, saying, 'This is what Jehovah has said: There are 3 things that I am directing against you. Choose for yourself one of them, that I may do it to you.'
11 Accordingly Gad went in to David and said to him: This is what Jehovah has said, 'Take your pick.
12 whether for 3 years there is to be a famine; or for 3 months there is to be a sweeping away from before your adversaries and for the sword of your enemies to overtake [you], or for 3 days there is to be the sword of Jehovah, even pestilence, in the land, with Jehovah's angel bringing ruin in all the territory of Israel.' And now see what I should reply to the One sending me. (1 Chronicles 21 NWT).

David got the plague. The other two options are fulfilled in greater meanings. Because every particle of every letter of the law will be fulfilled.

8 Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory,
9 and he said to him: All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me.
10 Then Jesus said to him: Go away, Satan! For it is written, 'It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.' (Matthew 4 NWT)

Jesus refused to do an act of worship to Satan. He was the one who leased those kingdoms to Satan in the first place! But someone has to fail that test, since failure was an option and all scriptural options are fulfilled. Well it was the Watchtower who failed that test. They put the throne of Satan into the temple of Jehovah by committing the Watchtower to obey the regulations of the United Nations in order to become an NGO affiliated to the UN Department of Information. They did that in order to gain all the kingdoms of the world - for evangelising to and for running a branch of the Watchtower from.

Likewise with the other tests. If you are a son of God hurl yourself down from the extremity of the Watchtower. The saints will have to do that. And tell these stones to become loaves. Yes, all the stones of the Zoar temple must become loaves just like the 5 presidents of the Watchtower, the 5 loaves of the feeding of the 5,000. They must all start baking decoded food in their kitchens of personal and of group research.

Aaron's Budding Flowering and Nut Ripening Rod  

2 Speak to the sons of Israel and take from them one rod for each paternal house from all their chieftains, by the house of their fathers, 12 rods. You will write the name of each one upon his rod.
3 And Aaron's name you will write upon Levi's rod, because there is one rod for the head of the house of their fathers.
4 And you must deposit them in the tent of meeting before the Testimony, where I regularly present myself to you.
5 And what must occur is that the man whom I shall choose, his rod will bud, and I shall certainly make subside from against me the murmurings of the sons of Israel, which they are murmuring against you.
6 So Moses spoke to the sons of Israel, and all their chieftains went giving him a rod for each chieftain, a rod for each chieftain, by the house of their fathers, 12 rods; and Aaron's rod was in among their rods.
7 Then Moses deposited the rods before Jehovah in the tent of the Testimony.
8 And it came about the next day that when Moses went into the tent of the Testimony, look! Aaron's rod for the house of Levi had budded, and it was bringing forth buds and blossoming flowers and was bearing ripe almonds.
9 Moses then brought out all the rods from before Jehovah to all the sons of Israel, and they went looking and taking each man his own rod. (Numbers 17 NWT)

So God chose one out of the 12 rods. But in the greater meaning all 12 rods will bud and blossom and ripen nuts. The other 11 were rejected in the literal account and so are accepted in the greater meaning. All 12 tribes of Zoar will be priestly and all 12 tribes will be kingly. There will be no exclusivity of either priesthood or kingship to any one tribe. There will be no greater tribe of Levi or of Judah. The almond is edible food but it takes effort to eat it. So these 12 greater priesthoods will produce edible spiritual food. But the food will be tough to chew. It will require effort to absorb it. The almond represents food that is hard to ingest.

[C14] Reader Questions from the Holy Spirit

8 ...You with little faith. 
9 Do you not yet see the point, or do you not remember the five loaves in the case of the five thousand and how many baskets you took up?
10 Or the seven loaves in the case of the four thousand and how many provision baskets you took up? (Matthew 16)

42 And they began saying: Is this not Jesus the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it that now he says: I have come down from heaven ? (John 6).

23 From the offspring of this [man] according to his promise God has brought to Israel a saviour, Jesus, 
24 after John, in advance of the entry of that one, had preached publicly to all the people of Israel baptism of repentance (Acts 13).

22 And the holy spirit in bodily form as a dove came down upon him, and a voice came out of heaven: You are my Son, the beloved; I have approved you (Luke 3).

32 John also bore witness, saying: I viewed the spirit coming down as a dove out of heaven, and it remained upon him (John 1).

6 But the righteousness resulting from faith speaks in this manner: Do not say in your heart: Who will ascend into heaven? that is, to bring Christ down. 
7 Or: Who will descend into the abyss? that is, to bring Christ up from the dead (Romans 10)

6 For who in the skies can be compared to Jehovah? Who can resemble Jehovah among the sons of God? [Michael means: Who is like God? And the answer is... Michael, who became a God to be worshipped on 33Sivan5. This must have happened on Pentecost for that is the festival of divinity. A Jubilee with gifts of the spirit, a release from the restriction of the angelic body for Michael] (Psalm 89).

48 What able-bodied man is there alive who will not see death? [Enoch, Immanuel etc] Can he provide escape for his soul from the hand of Sheol? [literally No, Gabriel resurrected Michael to God as an angel] [Yes, Jesus resurrected his wife] Selah [means musical pause, literally lift up - your attention from the music] (Psalm 89).

A Rather More Simple Reader Question from the Holy Spirit

26 For what benefit will it be to a man if he gains the whole world but forfeits his soul? or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? (Matthew 16)

Jesus asked this question of his disciples, but quite obviously he is asking it of every man and woman who can read. This will be fulfilled when the Mark of the Beast is enforced. Because that enforcement gives us the choice between gaining the whole world (economic inclusion) and losing our soul in Hell during the Kingdom of God (unless we reconsider at a later date during the 6 months of the test), or losing the whole world (economic exclusion) and gaining our soul for the Kingdom of God.

[C15] The Parallel Account and Subaccount Principle - Spot the Difference

We combine all the parallel accounts of the same literal events to make one overall account which is one whole cake, with each individual parallel account being a distinct non overlapping slice of that cake in each thread. Being one cake, the parallel accounts share the same symbolic meanings in all threads that they each have.

Since all the parallel accounts are combined into one account, the literal and event symbolic meanings are common, and the word symbolic meanings of each noun apply to the combined account. If a scene in the combined account does not have a thread which another scene does have, then that scene is omitted from that thread.

If any scene has a successive designation or a successive description, then this prophetic form only affects the particular scene that it is in, not the entire account, unless it is only a one scene account.

The countable noun count for the Repetition Principle is the global total for the entire account (because symbolism is account wide). So if a countable noun is repeated a total of 3 times in all of the parallel accounts in a combined account wherein each parallel account has 3 threads in total (i.e. one literal/event thread and two word symbolic threads), then the noun takes 3 different symbolic meanings in these threads.

Parallel Parables do not have to have been recited at the same time or in the same place or to the same audience. These things are irrelevant to a parable. Identical parables are parallel parables. Not sure how identical they have to be to be parallel.

For examples of sets of parallel accounts with differing number of threads - see the parallel accounts of Bartimaeus, one of the two the blind persons cured on the road to/from Jericho [49] - this set of accounts we do not understand! See also the signs of the times in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21 - this set of accounts we do understand from a code standpoint.

Pre-packaged Parallel Subaccounts: Combined parallel accounts are just a special case of multi scene accounts, such as Daniel 4 and Genesis 41. These two have dreams and recitals of dreams, which are both describing the same thing. So the dream and the recital are two parallel subaccounts of these accounts. So they share the same symbolism in all threads (literal/event and word) and their countable noun counts add. These cases, since they are created by God himself tell us what to do with parallel accounts in general and with parallel accounts which have differing numbers of threads in particular. One simply uses the threads that are there.

In the 4 Gospels, in Kings & Chronicles, in Ezra and Nehemiah, there are parallel accounts of the same events. For example the feeding of the 5,000 is mentioned 4 times, once in each Gospel! Matthew is parallel to Mark and Luke is parallel to John - see U67. The thing to do with these accounts, using the Power Principle, is to play 'spot the difference'. Because any differences are not mistakes, or omissions wherein God overlooked something, and thought he had better put an account in Mark just in case Matthew made a bit of a mess of it. They are deliberate. 

[C16] The Omission Principle

28 Samson now called to Jehovah and said: Sovereign Lord Jehovah, remember me, please, and strengthen me, please, just this once, Oh you the [true] God, and let me avenge myself upon the Philistines with vengeance for one of my two eyes (Judges 16).

6 So David said: Anyone striking the Jebusites first, he will become head and prince. And Joab the son of Zeruiah got to go up first, and he came to be head (1 Chronicles 11).

19 Next he commanded the crowd to recline on the grass and took the 5 loaves and 2 fishes, and, looking up to heaven, he said a blessing, and, after breaking the loaves, he distributed them to the disciples, the disciples in turn to the crowds. 20 So all ate and were satisfied, and they took up the surplus of fragments 12 baskets full (Matthew 14).

[C17] Helpful Tips

9 Jesus answered: There are twelve hours of daylight, are there not? If anyone walks in daylight he does not bump against anything, because he sees the light of this world (John 11).

[C18] The Symbolic meaning of 7

24 Seventy sevens, he is decreed for people of you and for city of holiness of you
25 From issuing of decree to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until anointed one, ruler, sevens seven, and sevens sixty-two (Daniel 9 - NIVHEOT).

8 And you must count for yourself seven Sabbaths of years, seven times seven years, and the days of the seven Sabbaths of years must amount to forty-nine years for you (Leviticus 25).

So since Tuesday happens entirely after Monday, and since these two days have never coincided or even overlapped a little, and likewise for the whole week, the whole 7, the whole sabbath of days, we can deduce that 7 things means 7 successive things in scripture. For an example of the symbolism of 7: see [37].

[C19] Elementary Sentence Counting and Cryptic Scriptures

18 In order that you may be thoroughly able to grasp mentally with all the holy ones what is the breadth and length and height and depth, 
19 and to know the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge (Ephesians 3).

46 The first is, not that which is spiritual, but that which is physical, afterward that which is spiritual (1 Corinthians 15).

21 Do you people not know? Do you not hear? Has it not been told to you from the outset? Have you not applied understanding from the foundations of the earth?
22 There is one who is dwelling above the circle of the earth, the dwellers in which are as grasshoppers, the one who is stretching out the heavens just as a fine gauze, who spreads them out like a tent in which to dwell (Isaiah 40).

26 Raise your eyes high up and see. Who has created these things? It is the one who is bringing forth the army of them even by number, all of whom he calls even by name. Due to the abundance of dynamic energy, he also being vigorous in power, not one [of them] is missing (Isaiah 40).

1 In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2 Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the surface of [the] watery deep; and God's spirit was moving to and fro over the surface of the waters.
3 And God proceeded to say: "Let there be light." Then there came to be light (Genesis 1).

25 And they will be given into his hand for a time, times and half a time (Daniel 7).

7 It will be for an appointed time, appointed times and a half (Daniel 12).

14 There is where she is fed for a time, times and half a time (Revelation 12).

14 But the two wings of the great eagle were given the woman, that she might fly into the wilderness to her place; there is where she is fed for a time and times and half a time away from the face of the serpent (Revelation 12).

6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and sixty days (Revelation 12).

List and Comparison Counts

25 and they will be given into his hand [metaphorical] for a time, and times and half a time (Daniel 7)

7 It will be for an appointed time, appointed times and a half (Daniel 12)

14 there is where she is fed for a time and times and half a time away from the face of the serpent (Revelation 12).

The 3 scriptures above are actually the definition of how to count a scriptural list. 

Solomon says there is a Time for Everything

12 Show us just how to count our days in such a way as to bring a heart of wisdom in (Psalm 90).

32 And of the sons of Issachar having a knowledge of how to discern the times to know what Israel ought to do, there were two hundred head ones of theirs, and all their brothers were at their orders (1 Chronicles 12)

13 And the king proceeded to say to the wise men having knowledge of the times, for in this way the king's matter [came] before all those versed in law and legal cases (Esther 1)

7 It does not belong to you to get knowledge of the times or seasons which the Father has placed in his own jurisdiction (Acts 1).

Here are the list counting rules as far as we presently understand them...

1. The list must have 3 or more items in it (since all 3 lists above have 3 items in them).
2. The list may have only 2 items in it if one item is body part, such as hand 5x, foot 5x, eyes 2x, loins 2x, face 5x.
3. All items in the list count as singulars, duals, plurals, halves or fractions.
4. The result is a measure of time or a number of repetitions.

5. A body part triggers a count.
6. A number triggers a count.
7. A comparison triggers a count (such as the beast was like a Leopard)
8. A command followed by its execution triggers a count (such Joshua commanded the people to shout and the people shouted. Elijah said to all the people approach me. And all the people approached him).
9. A heading followed by further description triggers a count being a form of comparison - is the next action part of the heading or not? (such as he mocked them and said: call in a loud voice etc)
10. Look! or Behold! starts a new count!

When a count is triggered one counts the whole sentence or perhaps the whole story related to the thing that has triggered the count.

With triggered qualified counts, you count the sense of the sentence rather the precise words used. This is the opposite of word symbolism!

List types include...

Objects of one verb.
Each item has a repeated noun.
Each item has a repeated preposition

Greek singular counts 1x
Greek Plural counts 2x
pollakij (many times) counts 3x

Hebrew Singular counts 1x
Hebrew Dual counts 2x
Hebrew Plural counts 3x

The king ate the potato = 1x
The king ate the potatoes = 3x in Hebrew and 2x in Greek
The kings ate the potatoes = 3x.3x=9x in Hebrew and 2x.2x=4x in Greek.

All the earth means the whole of the earth which counts as 1x in Greek and 1x in Hebrew

All the Hebrews means all the ones of the Hebrews which is 3x in Hebrew.

The hand has 5 fingers and so counts 5 times. It means 4x-5x, 5x or less but not 4x. A stretched hand means 5x-6x, 5x or more but not 6x (Exodus 14, and Jesus betrayed into the hands of sinners being 20 years max).
A king ruling over 5 kingdoms, counts 5x since his kingdoms are effectively the fingers of his dominion.
A mouth speaking 5 languages counts 5x, since these languages are effectively the fingers of his speech.

A hand [5x] holding oranges [2x] counts as 10x
A hand [5x] holding orange [things] [2x] counts as 10x

A hand [5x] holding oranges [2x] and green [things] counts as 20x.

A hand [5x] holding oranges [2x] and lemons [2x] counts as 20x. The count is forced on the first item because 'hand' is a body part. The list is too short to be self triggering, but is triggered by the body part.

Weeping is 1x
Watering of the eyes is 2x
Gnashing of the teeth is 32x for 32 human teeth.

The King of the Jews counts 1x (possessive genitive)
The God of the Hebrews counts 1x
The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob counts 1x.
House of Israel counts as 1x
Israel counts as 12x.

Goliath from the camps of the Philistines is 3x
One out of the 7 rulers is 7x
One of the Jews (Hebrew) is 3x (partitive genitive)
One of the synagogue rulers (Greek) is 2x (partitive genitive)

Actions in a state = State x Actions: Go into the roads and fences and bring them in is 2x.2x=4x for the state and 2x for the action. The count is 4x.2x=8x.

Lists which define a general category and then list specific items in that category are comparisons and so count. We think inclusively because all the items are included in the category.

Lists which repeat any word with each item are begging to be counted! We think these may count exclusively.

38 At that the fire of Jehovah came falling and went eating up the burnt offering and the pieces of wood and the stones and the dust, and the water that was in the trench it licked up (1Kings 18)??

We now think that the counting dimension of the code only applies to lists and to comparisons. For example...

6 And Jehovah himself had caused the camp of the Syrians to hear the sound of war chariots, the sound of horses, the sound of a great military force (2Kings7)

Counts being a list of 3 things.

Haggai, the prophet, ate 5 carrots counts 1x.1x.5x

Elijah went up [1x] and bent down [1x] and put his head between his knees [1x+2x] and said: I want to eat 7 bananas [7x] 

Counts as (1x+1x+1x+2x).7x=5x.7x=35x. Because his 7x speech is made in a state counting as 5x.

 I saw, and Look! a horse  = I saw (a vision) and Look thee (at the vision)! (In the vision there was) a horse = 1x+1x.1x = 2x

The Hebrew word for before/in front of him is wyn"p'l meaning to faces of him. Faces is a Hebrew plural which normally counts as 3x. But plainly this guy has only one face unless he is being triplicitous! So it counts as 1x not 3x.

Also sit out of my right [sides] is a polite way of saying sit out of my right side.
Also her masters were in the house, is a polite plural. 
These are all examples of the Royal 'we' essentially.

Jerusalem is a special case because it appears in the singular and in the plural in scripture.

Counting Examples

ACTS 1

The day of Jehovah (Joel2 and Zephaniah 1 and Malachi4 and Amos5 and Isaiah13)

Revelation 18:11-13 (Greek Interlinear)

For a full treatment of Revelation see U151

And the travelling merchants of the earth are weeping and mourning over her  because there is not one to buy their cargo anymore, a cargo [accusative]:         

41 times (Revelation 18:11-13 NWT adapted from Greek).

9 And the kings of the earth who committed fornication with her and lived in shameless luxury will weep and beat themselves in grief over her, when they look at the smoke from the burning of her,
10 while they stand at a distance because of their fear of her torment and say, 'Too bad, too bad, you great city, Babylon you strong city, because in one hour your judgment has arrived!'
11 And the traveling merchants of the earth are weeping and mourning upon/over/concerning her [epi + accusative], because there is no one to buy their [gomoj] full-stock/entire cargo/freight anymore [the earth is the financial system, the sea is individuals, boats are publicly listed corporations. These corporations are floated upon the stock market when they make an IPO. Their full stock is the stock in the company, their shares. The travelling merchants are the stock brokers].
12 a full-stock [gomoj] of gold and silver and precious stone and pearls and fine linen and purple and silk and scarlet; and everything in scented wood and every sort of ivory object and every sort of object out of most precious wood and of copper and of iron and of marble;
13 also cinnamon and Indian spice and incense and perfumed oil and frankincense and wine and olive oil and fine flour and wheat and cattle and sheep, and horses and coaches and slaves and [there is no one to buy] souls of men [Cargo list counts as 41x.]

The travelling merchants are weeping and mourning upon/over/concerning her (4x) because of 41x of a full stock. This makes 4x.41x =164x. Travelling merchants who are buying and selling with the Mark will continue to exist until the end of Adam on 2023Tebbeth14, when their weeping and mourning as humans ends. 164 days before then is 2023Tammuz30 (2023July19/20). THIS MUST BE WHEN THE STOCK MARKET GOES TO ZERO! For money is a false God which must be judged!

The Great Crowd in the 5 Colonnades of John 5