Home | Thanks to God | Welcome | Our History | The Bible Code | Help & Abbreviations | Site Index | Master Chronology | Joining & Leaving Us | Basic Bible Plot | Our Introduction Site | Make Donation | Q & A | Download Site & Fonts | Search This Site

[50] Male and Female Angels, Angelic Procreation, Pre-adamic Procreation, Post-adamic Procreation

Link to I5


Are the angels male and female?

Traditionally mankind believes them to be effectively neuter. In favour of this point of view we have the fact that they are always referred to as 'sons of God' in the bible and never as 'daughters of God'.

7 When the morning stars joyfully cried out together, And all the sons of God began shouting in applause? (Job 38).
6 For who in the skies can be compared to Jehovah? Who can resemble Jehovah among the sons of God? (Psalm 89)
43 Be glad, O heavens, together with him, and let all the angels of God worship him. Be glad, you nations, with his people, and let all the sons of God strengthen themselves in him, (LXXBagster Deuteronomy 32).

Furthermore female Christians eventually become sons of God, not daughters of God.

9 Happy are the peacemakers since they will be called 'sons of God' (Matthew 5).
26 You are all, in fact, sons of God through your faith in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3).

So women are to become male sons of God? Surely only confused mankind goes in for gender re-assignment surgery?

We know from the scriptures that God hates homosexuality...

22 And you must not lie down with a male the same as you lie down with a woman. It is a detestable thing (Leviticus 18).

We know from the scriptures and from common sense that Lesbianism is un-natural... 

26 That is why God gave them up to disgraceful sexual appetites, for both their females changed the natural use of themselves into one contrary to nature
27 and likewise even the males left the natural use of the female and became violently inflamed in their lust toward one another, males with males, working what is obscene and receiving in themselves the full recompense, which was due for their error (Romans 1).

God even detests cross dressing...

5 No garb of an able-bodied man should be put upon a woman, neither should an able-bodied man wear the mantle of a woman; for anybody doing these things is something detestable to Jehovah your God (Deuteronomy 22).

So would God put a female human in a male angelic body? Absolutely not. So either the 'sons of God' are asexual, or they are male and female like we are. But would God put a male into a neuter body? Well such an action would not transgress any of his laws on sex, so it is possible. So the question now becomes, are the angels all neuter or are they male and female?

Well we read in Genesis that the demons came down and married women before the flood and had children with them...

2 then the sons of the [true] God began to notice the daughters of men, that they were good-looking; and they went taking wives for themselves, namely, all whom they chose (Genesis 6).

4 The Nephilim proved to be in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of the [true] God continued to have
relations with the daughters of men and they bore sons to them, they were the mighty ones who were of old, the men of fame (Genesis 6).

These are not the actions of asexual neuter beings. These angels were not said to come down because they wanted to procreate, they were said to come down because the women looked good. So they must have felt some kind of sex drive. In fact their sex drive was so strong that they sinned, by coming down here and leaving their proper dwelling place of the heavens...

6 And the angels that did not keep their original position but forsook their own proper dwelling place he has reserved with eternal bonds under dense darkness for the judgment of the great day (Jude). 

Jesus adds to the debate with his answer to the sadducees about marriage in the Kingdom of God...

28 Consequently, in the resurrection, which of the 7 will she be [a] woman of (gunh)? For they all had (ecw) her.
29 In reply Jesus said to them: You are mistaken, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God,
30 for in the resurrection neither do they marry (gamew) nor are they given in marriage (gamizw), but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).

24 Jesus said to them: Is not this why you are mistaken, your not knowing either the Scriptures or the power of God?
25 For when they rise (anisthmi) out of [the] dead [ones] (nekroV), neither do they marry (gamew) nor are they given in marriage (gamizw), but are as angels in the heavens (Mark 12).

34 Jesus said to them: The sons of this system of things marry (gamew) and are given in marriage (gamizw),
35 but those who have been counted worthy of gaining that system of things and of the resurrection, the [one] out of [the] dead [ones] (nekroV) neither marry (gamew) nor are given in marriage (gamizw).
36 In fact, neither can they die (apoqnhskw) anymore, for they are like the angels, and they are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection (Luke 20).

In all three accounts of his answer we read that Jesus made the distinction between men marrying and women being given in marriage and then compared this situation to that of the angels. We see that women who are resurrected as sanctified born again human women are called 'sons of the resurrection' and 'sons of God'. So 'sons of God' can in fact be human daughters of God with associated angels. The word 'sons' really is used to mean offspring. This site uses the term 'sons of the 1AC', to mean men and women and children with a faith that makes them beneficiaries of the first Abrahamic covenant - see I29. So nothing Jesus said forces angels to be neuter. 

Jesus did not actually answer the question as to who would get the woman in the Kingdom, he just said there would be no marriage for those who have risen from the dead. This does not mean there will be no marriage in the kingdom of God. It means there will be no marriage amongst those who are not judicially dead and are therefore as angels in heaven. There will be no marriage for those who are spirit baptised, those who are born again, those who have associated angelic bodies - see I12

Marriage is an institution for the dead, the judicially dead. It is fine to be married for a long as you live, if you are not going to live for long. For death ends the marriage 'till death us do part'. But it is no good getting married if you are going to live indefinitely or forever. So angels do not get married as such a thing would be a monstrous commitment. Likewise the saints do not get married in the Kingdom of God, but those who are not saints do. 

Now Jesus is saying two things. He says that being given in marriage does not occur in heaven and he says that marrying does not occur in heaven. So he is telling us that there are both male and female angels. For it is females who are given in marriage and males who marry. But the power of Jesus' seeming labouring of this point is that there exist both sexes in the heavens... 

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).

The slam dunk proof that there are female angels and indeed angelic families is in Ephesians...

14 On account of this I bend my knees to the Father,
15 to whom every family in heaven and on earth owes its name (Ephesians 3).

Using the bible code to prove for a fact that there are male and female angels

Any unanswered question asked in the scriptures with two possible answers (normally yes and no), has the answer in the symbolic meaning, being the opposite of the answer in the literal meaning. 

In other words with any unanswered binary question in the scriptures, both possible answers are true. Whichever answer is true in the literal meaning of a literal account, the opposite answer is true in the greater meaning of the account. We visit this principle again in I45. In the literal meaning of Jesus words, no one marries this poor woman in the Kingdom of God. No one has her as his wife. But in the greater meaning which actually refers to covenants, all 7 brothers have her - see U32. Likewise in the kingdom of God, any one of the 7 or all of them one after the other (not all at once) could actually have this woman, but not as a wife. Because as we know God wishes to provide two parents for every child, one male and one female. And that is really the main purpose of marriage in this system. Although it is also a great form of emotional security and a great lesson in the longevity of love etc. But for the born again saints of the kingdom of God, we know that they too are male and female and that they will want to have beautiful non ageing perfect fleshed children, who wouldn't? We know too that God will satisfy that desire for them since he has said...

16 You are opening your hand and satisfying the desire of every living thing (Psalm 145).

And this scripture plainly does not refer to this system since the reader will not need to be told by the writer that for the most part Satan is not satisfying but is rather frustrating the desire of every living thing at present. But in the next system, God will satisfy all of us...

4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away (Revelation 21).

He will need a big Kleenex! So in particular those who want babies will have babies. So judicially alive people will have babies out of wedlock in the next system. But they will not have them willy nilly like they do in this system. There will be some child rearing agreement that the two parents make with each other, that amounts to a temporary marriage. This agreement can be discontinued after the child is fully reared one imagines. But by virtue of 7 of these agreements, the woman of the Sadducees example could actually have a child with each of the 7 brothers in the new system if the rules would permit such a thing. After all the whole purpose of brother-in-law marriage was to produce a child. 

There are two other witnesses we have seen from the bible code which absolutely nail the existence of male and female angels. 

1.  'Male and female he created them' Genesis (1:27) applies to humans in the literal meaning, and angels in the greater meaning, the first word thread, see U300.

27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God's image he created him; male and female he created them (Genesis 1).

2. Matthew 1 is the angelic ancestry of the angel Michael in the second word symbolic thread - see Matthew. And it has 4 women in it. These 4 are therefore 4 angelic women. They cannot all be different parts of the holy spirit, God's wife, since his wife is one unified group. 3 of the women, Tamar, Ruth and Rahab, only appear once in the account. So by the Repetition Principle of the code these nouns mean Tamar, Ruth and Rahab in all threads. So it is our exceeding great pleasure to introduce you to 3 beautiful female angels in the heavens, whose names are Date Palm (Tamar), Satisfying (Ruth) and Large (Rahab). There names will be spoken in the heavenly language of course, but this is what their names mean in English.

Furthermore, the only logical reason why a female angel might be called 'date palm' would be that she invented the date palm we suppose. So yes, heavenly women, at the least, can invent brilliant things. But who invented the Mosquito? - surely it was a demon.

So there are male and female angels. The pre-adamics are in the image of these angels in the respect of gender. In fact Gender is a tutor leading to love. God himself is neither male nor female because his love is perfect. We we are imperfect in our love so God made us and our brothers and sisters, the angels, and the pre-adamics male and female, to teach all of us the surpassing value of love. Actually to teach us all the surpassing value of loving just one person. 

Pre-adamic Man was sexually active but could not procreate and fill the earth

The second human creation of 'the man' is further specified by the phrase 'male and female he created them' and the first creation of 'man' is not so specified. Adam and Eve were told to fill the earth, and pre-adamic man were not told to fill the earth. Man, pre-adamic man, did not have a wife...

20 But for Man [md)] there was found no helper as a complement for him (Genesis 2)

The scripture does not say: But for the man, there was found no helper as a complement for him. So Adamic man had a wife, but again pre-adamic man had no wife. So pre-adamic man could not directly procreate and did not get married, just like the angels. We initially thought that this meant he was asexual. But archeology is against that hypothesis. There are cave paintings of men and women having sex which predate Adam. So then we theorized that pre-adamic man was male and female and sexual but sterile. This would certainly fit the scriptural constraints that we have discovered for him. Pre-adamic man would be male and female in form and in character but not reproductively male and female. The big change with Adam and Eve would then have been the capability for human-human reproduction. Prior to that humans were made some other way.

When God brought Eve to Adam, he said:

23 And he said, the man: This is at last bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh
This one will be called woman, because from Man [#y)] this one was taken (Genesis 2).

So Eve came from pre-adamic 'Man' as opposed to 'the man'. But she was gene enhanced using the genetic material of Adam, symbolised by his rib. We have 24 ribs and 24 gene pairs after all. So, thinking about it, Genesis is actually declaring that the pre-adamics differed from pre-fall Adam, in only one chromosome. In other words sexual fertility is controlled and programmed by a single chromosome. We know that this is true today. It is the sex chromosome which is XY in a man and XX in a woman. The result of the application of this activated chromosome to Eve was that she became fertile. She became a real woman as it were. The female equivalent of pre fall Adam genetically. In a sense Eve was baptised with the rib of Adam. She gained fertility for her indefinitely lasting non ageing body. 

Then the commentary continues with...

24 That is why man [#y)] will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh.
25 And both of them continued to be naked, the man and his wife, and yet they did not become ashamed (Genesis 2).

In early Genesis, 'the man' is Adam, man [md)] is pre-adamic man, and man [#y)] is all mankind. But pre-adamic men did not have genetic  mothers and fathers like we have today, since they were not created by heterosexual reproduction. They were therefore like the angels and like Melchizedek, of whom Paul says...

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

The pre-adamic children were carried in surrogate pre-adamic mothers just as the non adamics were carried in surrogate adamic mothers. 

Now Adam left God and the Holy spirit and broke God's law and stuck to his wife. This prophetic drama is telling us that pre-adamic man did not stick to his wife in that way, he did not get married, he did not have a wife to stick to. This may also explain why Adam and Eve were naked and unashamed. It seems that the shame associated with sex follows from its procreative capability.

This is why Eve said, on giving birth to Cain: I have produced a man with the aid of Jehovah (Genesis 4:1). Such a thing had never occurred before. Eve was saying, Wow! All these activated components that God has given me have enabled me to produce a man!

How did the Pre-adamics come about?

Jesus was born by in vivo fertilisation of a surrogate mother Mary by the Holy Spirit. He was conceived asexually. He was non adamic, not a son of Adam. Now Jesus is called the Last Adam, so putting this the other way around Adam was the first Jesus. So Adam was created in the same way that Jesus was created - asexually - see I6. He was also born by in vivo fertilisation by Holy Spirit of a surrogate pre-adamic woman. But then all the pre-adamics were also created asexually as were Jesus and Adam. But then we realise that Adam was pre-adamic as regards his method of creation, since sexual reproduction came later. So the pre-adamics were created in the same way as Jesus and the non adamics were created. And now we see it all.

In the Kingdom of God, those who are born again as 'as angels in heaven'. They do not get married...

30 For in the resurrection neither do men marry nor are women given in marriage, but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).

So they too are like Jesus and Adam and the pre-adamics. So now we can see that the post adamics of the Kingdom of God are in the same reproductive situation as the pre-adamics and the non adamics and the angels. It is only the 'dead' who procreate sexually and who get married. 

The angels effectively took the first human in the archeological records, homo habilis, to the modern human, homo sapiens, by an iterative design process during the first half of the 6th creative day. We do not want to use the word 'evolution', but pre-adamics presumably did 'evolve' from the homo habilis to modern man through the design expertise of the angels. Once the pre-adamic design was perfected, God made Adam. Then he gave us the ability to procreate, which effectively made Adam a God and put mankind into mass production. 

Pre-adamics were both sterile, since they were 'not male and not female' in the reproductive sense. So they died out and did not go through flood. 

7 So Jehovah said: I am going to wipe men whom I have created off the surface of the ground, from man to domestic animal, to moving animal and to flying creature of the heavens, because I do regret that I have made them (Genesis 6).

The flood destroyed the sons of Adam and their offspring, not the pre-adamics who were raptured before it came. Presumably they were the servants of the adamics as the angels are of God. Eve was to become the mother of everyone living, so Adam knew the pre-adamic reproduction would end. 

20 After this Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she had to become the mother of everyone living (Genesis 3).

'Eve' actually means 'living [one]'. Eve could not become mother of everyone living until after Adam died of course. So they might have died out during Adam's 930 year life, or possibly they lasted until the flood.                               

Pre-adamics lived in extended family groups. Each kid had a mother and a father whose genes were used by the angels in the creation of the kid as in the case of Jesus. Though the surrogate mother and father were not bound in marriage to each other, they must have been party of a child rearing agreement, as the angels are. So now we see another reason why the angels came down and took the daughters of Adam as their wives. They wanted to have kids on their own terms, without having to ask the holy spirit for them. One wonders whether the holy spirit would permit demons to have children in fact.

Adamís father would have been the male genetic template for Adam and his mother would have been the female genetic template. But Adam was truly a son of God by holy spirit. So his genes were more than just the result of a merging of the genes of his father and his mother. 

Jesus was conceived from the very DNA of Joseph and Mary, any less would have been adultery by the holy spirit (in sin my mother conceived me - Psalm 51:5). Then God enhanced his genes to make him non adamic - see I18. Likewise the pre-adamics were created by combining the DNA of their two surrogate parents, and then the angels would enhance that DNA to make the children more and more spiritual. This is how man journeyed from Homo Habilis to Homo Sapiens. The journey involved hundreds of iterations and ended with the pre-adamic humans who lived at the time Adam was created.

In modern industrial parlance, pre-adamics were hand crafted prototypes made in the labs, whereas adamics were mass produced finished models with the full design spec implemented, made from the re-production line. The same could well have been true for the animals as well. In fact the design process for animals and humans used by the angels is really no different from the design process for motor cars or computers used by men today. We design the device virtually on a design computer or on paper, and then make a series of prototypes, and then finally once the design specification is achieved, we go into mass production. Mass production for humans is sexual reproduction which is the blessing of Genesis 1:28. This blessing is in fact the ISO9001 approval stamp from God.

The Salvation Status of Pre-adamic Man

We know that the pre-adamics, not being under any death sentence, would have been raptured when they died. It is not inconceivable that some of them killed each other however, and possibly lost their salvation status. Now, Adam was made in the image of God and the pre-adamics were made in the image of the angels. So the pre-adamics are the children of the angels and the adamics are the children of God. But God himself was involved in the creation of the pre-adamics for he said: Let us make man in our image. So the pre-adamic had something from God as well. Now since the angels are sons of God, they have the possibility of eternal life. And since the pre-adamics are sons of both the angels and God they too must have this possibility, since like begets like. So God pesumably put the basic 'spiritual' subroutine in the pre-adamic BIOS. The angels then tweaked the whole system for the first half of the 6th creative, day, the evening of that day, to increase abstract thought capability which is part of spirituality. But since Adam was made in God's image, it is apparent that he and his sons will be Gods to not only the pre-adamics, but also their fathers, the angels. For the hierarchy of the fathers will be the hierarchy of the sons. So Satan could see that Adam was competition for him. Adam was a threat to his presidential position.

So the pre-adamics had basic salvation spirituality from the first one that was made, the original homo habilis. But this capability and other physical capabilities and the interaction between the two were presumably iteratively enhanced for a few thousand years until they were perfected and then Adam was made by God - see I2. The Kingdom of God is a second Eden for the sons of Adam and for the pre-adamics who heard the preaching of the sons of Adam. So the pre-adamics who pre-existed Adam will not be a part of that kingdom on earth. But those who lived with him and who listened to him could join a covenant (in fact mediated by Adam's surrogate father - I28) and so could enter into the Kingdom of God on earth.

According to archeological records, pre-adamic man did not worship in temples, the first temples were built after Adam. According to the bible, pre-adamic man was not blessed, meaning that he could not achieve indefinite life or everlasting life in that form as Adam and his sons could. So pre-adamic man took no spiritual test. But he was spiritual, he could think abstractly, we know this from the cave paintings. Yet these were primitive and 2 dimensional. So we can deduce that the pre-adamics had a 2 dimensional spirituality, they were capable of abstract thought to some extent but not to the extent that the sons of Adam are capable of it. They spoke but they did not write. The capability to think abstractly in great depth was the pre-requisite for God to appear through Adam and for true worship in temples to begin and for salvation testing to commence and for writing to be invented. 

Once the pre-adamics had progressed to this stage in abstract metaphorical thinking capability, God appeared to them through Adam. 

So really the pre-adamics were spiritual infants, too young spiritually to be baptised. Yes they perhaps lived for a hundred  years, but they never attained the spiritual capability of modern man. They were the first stage, the infant stage for the baby angels, angels of the 6th creative day. After they were raptured, they then met their angelic parents, and we presume that they could take the spiritual salvation tests that the angels take. 

The 6th Creative Day

On the 5th creative 'day', God made the sea animals and on the 6th he made the land animals, pre-adamic man and Adam. These days were not literal days, but epochs as we discovered in I2. In fact each creative day lasted 14,400 years of 'real time' - see U234 on the research website.

All the animals are the constituent components of man from a behavioural standpoint. We are the sum of all animal behaviour. In the 6th day, when he created all the land animals, he was declaring the way that man would behave in this system. Animals behave the way they do automatically by design. But humans can choose any one of the animalistic behavioural patterns, and we can choose the pattern of Jesus, the pattern of Abraham, the path of faith.

But look! The 6th day was a creative day, It was all a creative day up to the last minute of it when Adam sinned. So God was continuously creating us throughout the entire 14,400 real time years of the 6th creative day. So that is why we could not reproduce sexually. For sexual reproduction is a form of cloning, it is a mixing and a matching of existing genetic material, it is not creating anything new. But we were being continuously tweaked and improved during the 6th day. Every new human was in fact a new creation!! That is where the angelic involvement came in, that is why the pre-adamics were children really of the angels. It was still a creative day. 

In the 7th creative day, after 3993Nisan14, we could reproduce sexually, because nothing new was being made, we were just mixing and matching existing genetic material.

So the 6th creative day was the design process, a 14,400 year design process, and the 7th creative day was mass production, which in biological terms is reproduction.

So had the pre-adamics reproduced sexually, then their kids would not be new creations, so the creative day would have ended. So no they could not reproduce sexually.

What the 6th creative day was all about was the transition, the metamorphosis, from an animalistic being to a spiritual being. In that sense the lie of evolution is true. We did evolve from an animal. But not by sexual reproduction and natural selection. We evolved by continuous improvement in our design, making us more and more spiritual. And only when we were fully spiritual did God press the mass production button and allow us to reproduce sexually as the animals do. The 6th day was human prototype after human prototype.

Now we know what the angels were doing for 14,400 years. They were performing an interactive design process, taking man from an animal to a basic spiritual human, to very spiritual human. As regards the animals and the pre-adamics, God called them 'good'. But as regards Adam, the super spiritual, super abstract thinking being, the spiritual equivalent of the angels themselves, God called him and his environment 'very good'.

25 And God proceeded to make the wild beast of the earth according to its kind and the domestic animal according to its kind and every moving animal of the ground according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good (Genesis 1).
31 After that God saw everything he had made and, look! [it was] very good. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a 6th day (Genesis 1).

Humans can imagine, we can simulate in our minds, we can think abstractly. The very thing that separates us from the animals, abstract thought, is the method of communication that the bible uses to teach us. The symbolism of the bible is the essence of spirituality. Language itself is an abstraction. A computer is not an 8 letter word it is a mechanical device. Satan is not a 5 letter word, he is the head of demonic mission control in the heavens. 

So we are all happy to make this one abstraction to get language. Animals cannot do this to any great extent. Chimps can do it a bit. But if we are prepared to make one abstraction to get a word, then should we not be prepared to make a second abstraction to get a symbolic meaning for that literal word? We do this anyway in regular speech. If a person is cool, this does not mean that he is poikilothermic, having a lower body temperature than the rest of us. It means that he is laid back, relaxed. This is a symbolic use of a literal word which is used symbolically for a physical temperature.

The bible just makes a few more symbolic uses of our vocabulary. We read it thinking of this is so symbolic how can I understand it? But really all language is a symbolic reference to reality in the first place, and many words have further symbolic meanings in regular speech. The bible just gives them a further Christian meaning.


An article published by the BBC on October 29th 2005 reports that scientists have discover a gene which makes normal sexually competent humans either sterile or fertile.



Apparently a man with good sperm and a woman with good eggs do not conceive unless the two gametes can do the right genetic dance when they meet. And the Jenifer Lopez of conception is the HIRA Gene. This gene determines the dance steps in fertilisation. If there is the slightest mutation or defect in the HIRA gene then the the sperm treads on the toe of the egg during the genetic mating dance, and its no baby.

This is why some people are infertile today even though everything appears to be working normally. 

So scientists have just discovered a genetic mechanism that God designed to make humans fertile or infertile. 

Most mating behaviour in humans and animals involves a dance of some sort. And here God has our genes also doing a dance. We are so fractal, our very bodies declaring the molecular behaviour of our DNA. It would appear that pre-adamic man had two left feet however. 

Post Adamic Procreation in the Kingdom of God

In this great Kingdom there will be the dead, those who are not born again, and the living, those who are born again. In Gehenna, missing out on this kingdom there will be the second dead, those who are conscious but have no bodies, no souls, they exist as spirits in prison, watching us but non interacting with us other than when we visit them which is we must in accordance with Matthew 25, the parable sheep and the goats. So even if your loved one ends up in Hell, you will be able to visit them in the Kingdom for God does nothing to destroy love. It is Satan who is the enemy of love. God is love's champion and Jesus is the first of his sons to perfect his own love to the point where it is unbreakable in the harshest of circumstances. So all discussion about the power of Jesus' love is academic, it is perfected, he can relate to God as one day we will all relate to God and to him and to each other, with perfect love.

But the tutor that leads us to that love is gender in this system and the next and many more after that. So how will the genders relate to each other in the Kingdom of God on earth? Well first we must define the dead people who will live in the kingdom of God.

Definition: The Judicially Second Dead, are living in indefinitely lasting human bodies (Jaredian or Methuselaian) and are not under any first death sentence, such as the adamic first death sentence that we are all suffering from today. But they do not have associated angels, they have no angelic body and so are second dead from an angelic standpoint.

These 'dead', could get married in the Kingdom but it would be a monstrous commitment, since they might not lose their kingdom bodies for at least 1,000 years! As regards the living, those not in judicial second death, they could not possibly get married, or they would spend an eternity with each other which is a ludicrous commitment to make before one has developed perfect love. Think of the arguments! You said 5 million years ago that you would never forget my birthday! Looking again at Jesus remarks on marriage in the Kingdom...

28 Consequently, in the resurrection, which of the 7 will she be [a] woman of (gunh)? For they all had (ecw) her.
29 In reply Jesus said to them: You are mistaken, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God,
30 for in the resurrection neither do they marry (gamew) nor are they given in marriage (gamizw), but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).

24 Jesus said to them: Is not this why you are mistaken, your not knowing either the Scriptures or the power of God?
25 For when they rise (anisthmi) out of [the] dead [ones] (nekroV), neither do they marry (gamew) nor are they given in marriage (gamizw), but are as angels in the heavens (Mark 12).

34 Jesus said to them: The sons of this system of things marry (gamew) and are given in marriage (gamizw),
35 but those who have been counted worthy of gaining that system of things and of the resurrection, the [one] out of [the] dead [ones] (nekroV) neither marry (gamew) nor are given in marriage (gamizw).
36 In fact, neither can they die (apoqnhskw) anymore, for they are like the angels, and they are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection (Luke 20).

We see that Matthew 22 would apply to the living and to the dead in the Kingdom. So it would appear that no one gets married in the kingdom at all. But plainly we will procreate, since that is what we do. So we will enter into child rearing agreements as the angels do. Don't forget that our children will take twice as long to grow up just as the sons of the pre-flood system did. So each child rearing agreement will last 40 years minimum. Presumably one can extend that agreement (rather like people renew their vows today) for further children if required. In the final analysis these kingdom child rearing agreements will last longer than most marriages do today we imagine.

Furthermore since sex in the Kingdom will not produce offspring, we will be able to have sex with each other when desired, so long as neither party is in a child rearing agreement. We are not sure whether the dead will be permitted to have sex with the living or have children with them. 

Women will not have huge birth pains as they do in this system, thing will return to the pre-adamic level of pain. And pregnancy will result from a request by a couple to a priest for a baby as it is done in heaven. (Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven). So this whole marriage thing was really created for the judicially first dead. Sex will not be regarded as shameful in any way in the kingdom as it is to some extent today in many cultures and religions. This conjures up the image of the swinging 60s. But we imagine that the Kingdom is everything good that the peace and love revolution of the 1960s promised without all the bad things that it actually delivered. 

Would it not be great to live in a world where sex does not sell at all because we are all actually sexually satisfied? The fact that almost every advert today has some kind of sexual suggestion within it, says that our society is completely sexually frustrated. That frustration is from Satan not from God. Desires will be less inflamed and more loving in the kingdom and we will not be subjected to endless pornography in adverts, newspapers, movies, women's attire and the internet as we are today.


Einstein said: Religion without science is blind, science without religion is lame.

Sire Isaac Newton believed that mankind owed it to God as a debt to search for his laws in his physical universe, the cosmos, and to search for his laws in his spiritual universe, the bible. He believed that Nature's Laws of motion which underpin the dynamics of all physical things had a spiritual equivalent in the bible. He believe the bible was written in a code based upon laws. He was right, but he lived too early to be permitted to see the code.

The LWs agree with both of these fathers of modern science and maths. We have discovered that: True Science and and True Religion are the same thing, a sincere search for God, in his various works. And further that True Art and True Religion are the same thing, a successful communication to a human audience of what we have discovered that God has given us. So a full and proper analysis of the Genesis creation account which reveals the two types of man that God and the angels created, fills the gap between archaeology and theology and resolves the conflict between the scientific priesthood and the religious priesthood.

Of course evolution and the missing link go straight out of the Window with a pre-adamic human race that could not procreate without angelic assistance! Every human being up until 6,000 years ago was created directly by the holy spirit, with two angelic parents and a surrogate human mother and a surrogate human father bound by a child rearing agreement.

Likewise the angelic manner of procreation is that a male angel and a female angel enter into a child rearing agreement of some kind and then go the the priest and ask for a child we imagine, by analogy with the pre-adamics. Then the holy spirit gives a child to the pair of them, without any pregnancy or female childbirth. Presumably this child has 'genetic' character traits from both parents. Then when the baby angel is born it has two surrogate parents to look after it, but really it is the child of God and the holy spirit. 

This may seem un-natural to us, but we are the enigma, we are the exception, we are the judicially dead people who procreate. It is our method of procreation that is abnormal. For truly we sons of Adam are surrogate parents all, to our children which properly belong to God. 

In summary, the pre-adamics, the post adamics, and the angels, all have surrogate children after the manner of the birth of Jesus Christ. None of those groups get married, but they have a temporary child rearing agreement for each God given child. And all adamic couples having non adamic children, have them after the manner of the birth of Jesus Christ. But the two surrogate parents are married in the case of the adamics. For marriage is the child rearing agreement for the dead. But the glory of gender is that it is our tutor in love for the non divine.

Only the dead reproduce sexually, the pre-adamics and the post adamics and the angels are infertile. But look how many barren women produced children in the scriptures...

Sarah was old and barren before the angel announced that she would give birth to Isaac. Rebekah was barren before God listened to the entreaties of Isaac her husband so that she conceived the twins, Esau and Jacob. Rachel was barren for years and for 10 sons to Jacob her husband, before God finally opened her womb and gave her Joseph. Manoah's wife was barren before the angel with the wonderful name announced to her and to her husband that she would give birth to Samson. Zechariah's wife, Elizabeth, was old and barren before Gabriel told Zechariah that she would have John the baptist. All of these similar accounts are saying something about sons of God coming from barren women. They are telling us that angels and pre-adamics and all those born again with associated angels in the kingdom have children by the grace of God, not by their own reproductive powers. It is only the sons of Adam who have them by sexual reproduction. 

So now we can see what Isaiah really meant when he said...

1 Cry out joyfully, you barren woman that did not give birth! Become cheerful with a joyful outcry and cry shrilly, you that had
no childbirth pains, for the sons of the desolated one are more numerous than the sons of the woman with a husbandly owner, Jehovah has said (Isaiah 54).

Or as Paul said...

26 But the Jerusalem above is free and she is our mother.
For it is written: Be glad, you barren woman who does not give birth; break out and cry aloud, you woman who does not have childbirth pains; for the children of the desolate woman are more numerous than [those] of her who has the husband (Galatians 4).

The daughters of Adam reproduce by being fertile and getting married and having childbirth pains. But the daughters of God who are barren and do not get married, cry out with joy for they have more children than their dead sisters. Amen. 

The pre-adamic women gave birth, and had birth pains which were less than their adamic sisters, who suffer along with Eve. And the female post adamic saints in the new system will likewise give birth with reduced birth pains like their pre-adamic sisters, being free of the punishment of Eve. But the daughters of God, the female angels, do not give birth, they are barren, they are reproductively desolated, they have no birth pains, and yet they have more children than all their human sisters!

Technical Note

The Word Symbolic meaning of Matthew 1 shows the ancestral tree From Jehovah to Jesus. So each angel had a main ancestor, a 'father'. So if two angels were involved in requesting each angelic child from the holy spirit, then one of them was the head parent, the 'father' and the other was the assistant parent, 'the mother' the helper even. What human men and women did was to physicalise these roles for the angels to see them more clearly.

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

This statement describes the creation of Melchizedek and the pre-adamics and the sons of God, the angels. They were not genetic descendants, they did not have genetic fathers of mothers like Adam. They were all non genetic in descent in contrast to the sons of Adam.