Home | Thanks to God | Welcome | Our History | The Bible Code | Help & Abbreviations | Site Index | Master Chronology | Joining & Leaving Us | Basic Bible Plot | Our Introduction Site | Easy Guide Book | Q & A | Download Site & Fonts | Search This Site

[506] The 5/6 earthly identities of Michael, Gabriel and Melchizedek

We have seen in section [14b] that Jesus was possessed by Michael. We have seen in section [229] that John the Baptist was possessed by Gabriel.

Enoch was Michael

We read of Enoch that:

23 So all the days of Enoch amounted to 365 years. 
24 And Enoch kept walking with the [true] God. Then he was no more, for God took him (Genesis 5).

So God took him at the end of his life and he was no more. But Paul further informs us:

15 By faith Enoch was transferred so as not to see death, and he was nowhere to be found because God had transferred him; for before his transference he had the witness that he had pleased God well (Hebrews 11).

So when God took him, so that his days ended, he was transferred so as not to see death. Well the only other place he could have been, if his days had ended on this earth, was heaven. So Enoch ascended to heaven, without dying.

Now the question is did God make some kind of exception in the case of Enoch amongst the sons of Adam, that he would not apply the death penalty to him because he was such a good chap? Moses answers:

4 The Rock, perfect is his activity,
For all his ways are justice.
A God of faithfulness, with whom there is no injustice;
Righteous and upright is he (Deuteronomy 32).

So he did not break his own justice in the case of Enoch. So if Enoch did not die, then Enoch was not under a death sentence. And if Enoch was not under a death sentence then he was not a son of Adam. And if he was not a son of Adam then he was a son of God. Just like Jesus was. Now we turn to the words of Peter:

21 Then Peter came up and said to him: Lord, how many times is my brother to sin against me and am I to forgive him? Up to 7 times? 
22
Jesus said to him: I say to you, not, Up to 7 times, but, Up to 77 times (Matthew 18 NWT).
The Greek Interlinear is:

22 Not I am saying to you until 7 times, but until seventy times seven (Matthew 18 - KI)

The KJV and the GLT translate this verse as above. But this is dodging the issue of whether it is to be understood as:

Seventy times seven times, i.e. 490 times or just 77 times

i.e. or whether a further 'times' is to be understood and a multiplication is to be expected. Nowhere else in the bible in the literal meaning as far as we are aware is there such a multiplication.

No bible translates this as 490 times. Actually the Greek is:

ebdomhkontakiV (seventy times) epta (seven), and the Greek for 7 times is eptakiV. The Greek for 77 is ebdomhkonta (seventy) epta (seven). The Greek for 70 lots of 7 times would be:

ebdomhkonta (seventy) eptakiV (7 times) which is 70 lots of 7 times we think.

We can get help from the words of a certain Lamech to his wives:

23 Hear my voice, you wives of Lamech; Give ear to my saying:
A man I have killed for wounding me, Yes, a young man for giving me a blow.
24 If seven times Cain is to be avenged, Then Lamech seventy times and seven (Genesis 4)

So in this case where 7 times is compared to a larger number of times involving 70 and 7, it is 77 times. Now the LXX translation of this, which is a Greek translation of the old testament made for the Greek speaking world about 300 years before Jesus, has:

ebdomhkontakiV (seventy times) epta (seven) for the Hebrew which we translate seventy times and seven.

So that ends that matter and the NWT has got this right. It is 77 times.

Now the great thing to realise at this point is that Jesus was the 77th in line from God through Adam, Seth etc. Please indulge us whilst we describe the excitement that Massoud and Gordon had when they first saw the identity of Enoch.

Massoud rang Gordon and said, how many generations was it from Adam to Jesus. Gordon said I think it was 66 or 77 (sic). Massoud said: So was it 77 (sic)? Gordon said it might have been. Massoud then quoted Jude:

14 Yes, the 7th one [in line] from Adam, Enoch, prophesied also regarding them, when he said: Look! Jehovah came with his holy myriads, 
15
to execute judgment against all, and to convict all the ungodly concerning all their ungodly deeds that they did in an ungodly way, and concerning all the shocking things that ungodly sinners spoke against him (Jude).

He said that Lamech was the 7th in line through Cain, the guy who was to be avenged for 7 times, and Enoch was the 7th in line through Seth, and Jesus was the 77th in line from Adam (sic), so there seems to be some kind of relationship between Enoch and Jesus, being implied by Lamech's song to his wives here.

At this point we both got very excited and Gordon drove over to Massoud's place in Kensington. We then counted the descendents from Adam to Jesus as in Luke, the maternal line, and there were 76, so there were 77 in line from God to Jesus. So a comparison was definitely being made in the scriptures between Enoch being the 7th in line from Adam and Jesus being the 77th in line from God. And whereas the vengeance penalty on Cain ended after 7 times, the greater meaning of the vengeance penalty on Lamech ended after 77 generations with the death of Jesus, which was the forgiveness of Adam's sin, the end of Vengeance from God on the sons of Adam.

Then we considered Peter's words about forgiveness, and we see that there was a forgiveness 77 generations after God in the case of Jesus, but there weren't 7 generations after Adam in the case of Enoch. Now why would the bible make such a comparison? Massoud postulated that this was because Enoch was 'Jesus', by which he meant possessed by Michael. We already knew that Enoch was not a son of Adam. The only other example that we had at that time of a non adamic man was Jesus, who was possessed by Michael.

At this point we both started pacing around the room in a state of disbelief and well, ecstasy really. Then Gordon sat down and said:

'Before Abraham came into existence I have been' quoting Jesus' words from:

57 Therefore the Jews said to him: You are not yet 50 years old, and still you have seen Abraham?
58 Jesus said to them: Most truly I say to you, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been (John 8).

He has been here, Gordon exclaimed, that's what the scripture means. He has been here before!! (In fact he saw Abraham as Isaac as we shall see later in the section).

Then Gordon freaked out, because basically mankind had killed one of its patriarchs (although Enoch procreated before Michael entered him)! When Jesus said at his death: Father forgive them for they know not what they do, they were killing their own ancestor. They were killing the father of Noah and of Abraham in a sense. This was really something.

Then later we realised that the Hebrew word 'Enoch' means 'one trained up' or 'initiated'. So here was Michael's training to be the Messiah!! Then we understood this logically contorted scripture:

13 Moreover, no man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man (John 3).

This requires a clear thinking head. It is saying that the Son of man has descended, and he is the one who has ascended. It is saying that the Son of man has both ascended and descended. But this statement was made at the beginning of Jesus' ministry. So he had ascended before he died. We took this at the time as referring to his ascension as Enoch. In fact he may have been referring to his ascension during the 40 days in the wilderness, which was also 40 days up the mountain as in the case of Moses, for the scripture says:

8 Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory (Matthew 4).

Some mountain. There is no earthly mountain high enough for this. It was a heavenly mountain that Satan took Jesus to.

The other angelic visits

12 Look! I am coming quickly, and the reward I give is with me, to render to each one as his work is.
13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end (Revelation 22).

By the Immediate Repetition Principle, there is a greater meaning to Alpha and Omega and a greater meaning to the concept of first and last. The clue is in the verse above: I am coming quickly! Jesus was the first to come to this world as Enoch, the one transferred so as not to see death. And he is the last to come in this system to appoint FDS4, and finally after this system as Abbadon the passover angel of Armageddon.

11 They have over them a king, the angel of the abyss. In Hebrew his name is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon (Revelation 9).

The greater meaning of Alpha and Omega, more than merely first and last, is that there are 24 letters in the Greek alphabet and there are 24 comings of Michael, Gabriel and Melchizedek in all to mankind. Beginning with Enoch and ending with Abaddon, these both being comings of Michael. This is a big understanding. This is another reason why the 'hour' of a coming is often used, there being 24 hours in the whole Hebrew day, and Gregorian day. 

So we need to go on a treasure hunt and find a few more angels in the bible!

Jared, Methuselah and Jehoiada

We know from section [235] that as regards the sons of Adam, the maximum lifespan before the flood was 960, then after the flood it was 480, then after Peleg it was 240, then after Moses it was 120. So we can now scour the bible to see who outlived these age limits. The results of our searches  are:

20 So all the days of Jared amounted to 962 years and he died (Genesis 5).

27 So all the days of Methuselah amounted to 969 years and he died (Genesis 5).

15
And Jehoiada got to be old and satisfied with years and gradually died, being a 130 years old at his death (Chronicles 24).

Cainan was Melchizedek

Discovering the human identity of Melchizedek is not an easy task, Paul says:

11 Because he has been specifically called by God a high priest according to the line-up (lit) of Melchizedek. Concerning him we have much to say and hard to interpret (lit), since you have become dull of hearing (Hebrews 5).

This ‘him’ could be either Jesus or Melchizedek, the scripture is deliberately ambiguous. After the reader has read this section, he will understand that Paul is referring to Melchizedek in one meaning. Melchizedek is described thus:

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

6 But the man who did not trace his genealogy from them took tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the promises (Hebrews 7).

So Melchizedek is without Genealogy, in the sense that he is fatherless and motherless, but he is with Genealogy, one which he does not trace from the sons of Abraham. He is also made like the Son of God. Well Melchizedek was a human, so the only way that he could have been made like Jesus, the human son of God, is that he was born by holy spirit in the same way that Jesus was. Luke says of Jesus:

23 Furthermore, Jesus himself, when he commenced, was about thirty years old, being the son, as the opinion was, of Joseph (Luke 3).

But of course Luke is bearing witness that he was not the son of Joseph, so he was fatherless, and he was motherless. He was non-adamic, he was a genetic descendent of neither his mother nor his father, for such descendency would have made him a son of Adam. But then he could trace his genealogy back to David - see U46, since God said to King David...

12 When your days come to the full, and you must lie down with your forefathers, then I shall certainly raise up your seed after you, which will come out of your inward parts; and I shall indeed firmly establish his kingdom (2 Samuel 7).

So how do we reconcile these two seemingly contradictory characteristics of the Christ? Well, Jesus was not born of Adultery, so he was conceived in sin as a true son of Joseph and Mary by the process that we now know as in vitro fertilisation (although God may have done it in vivo in Mary actually). Then, once conception had occurred, God zapped his genes so that they became non adamic but remained Davidic and Jesus became sin free. One suspects that whatever gene therapy God gave Jesus did not alter his physical appearance at all. But after the gene therapy, Jesus was fatherless and motherless, without genealogy from Adam. Although he did have genealogy from God, and from David.

We can therefore see that Melchizedek was non-adamic too, this is how he was without genealogy, that is adamic genealogy. But he could trace his genealogy to his father God, and his mother, the heavenly woman, the holy spirit. 

So now we have to find a further non-adamic human in the scriptures with a non-adamic genealogy. Well there is a chap who has a very strange genealogy in the scriptures and he is Cainan. Luke says of him that Shelah was the son of Cainian who was the Son of Arpachshad (Luke 3). Whereas Moses describes Shelah as the son not of Cainan but of Arpachshad (Genesis 11). Whereas the LXX has Shelah the son of Cainan the son of Arpachshad (Genesis 11). 

35 Son of Eber
Son of Shelah
36 Son of Cainan
Son of Arpachshad
Son of Shem
Son of Noah (Luke 3)

24 And Arpachshad became father to Shelah, and Shelah became father to Eber (Genesis 10).

12 And Arpachshad lived 35 years. Then he became father to Shelah. 
13 And after his fathering Shelah Arpachshad continued to live 403 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
14 And Shelah lived 30 years. Then he became father to Eber
15 And after his fathering Eber Shelah continued to live 403 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters (Genesis 11).

What is going on here? Well the first thing to do is to remember that God is perfect and we are imperfect. So just because two scriptures look to us to be contradictory, this doesn’t mean that the mistake is God’s. It means that we are not intelligent enough to see what God is saying. If you have faith in God, that he can raise the dead, and that he created you, then he can for a fact arrange for Moses and Luke to write two accounts about Cainan which are non-contradictory.

So how could Shelah be the son of Aprachshad and of Cainan, who was actually Shelah’s brother? The situation is that Shelah has two different physical fathers. One cannot say that one of these fathers was a spiritual father, and he baptised Shelah in holy spirit, becoming mediator of judicial life, because Luke and Moses in the New Testament Greek and the BHS are both giving us physical genealogies. Well, if Shelah and Cainan were both sons of Arpachshad, and Shelah dies, and Cainan resurrected him, then Cainan would become a second physical father to Shelah. The statement that Cainan fathered Shelah would be true, because a physical resurrection is a mediation of physical life from God to a human, and this is fatherhood as we know it.

In this way Lazarus had two physical fathers, his genetic father and Jesus. Because his genetic father did not father the second body of Lazarus, Jesus mediated the creation of that body. It was actually a non-adamic body, because Lazarus, having died, was no longer under an adamic death sentence. No doubt Lazarus’ second body looked exactly like the first, but his second father was the eternal father, Jesus Christ. You may ask then why did Lazarus die a second time? The answer is physically that he was in an ageing non-adamic body as was Jesus. But judicially, Lazarus actually died sacrificially as do the rest of the remnant, the new covenant saints. They give their physical life up, not because of Adam’s sentence, because this is lifted at their sanctification in Jesus’ blood, which is their baptism into the name of the son. They give their physical life actually as a ransom for the great crowd, in order that these ones can walk through Armageddon and never die at all - see [160].

If Cainan resurrected Shelah then he would need to be clean to do this. A resurrection is different from being a fleshly father. Peter and Paul were used to create life, when they resurrected Eutychus and Dorcas. This is a very high form of priesthood. You cannot create life on behalf of God without possessing your own. And the possession of your own life, is the righteous decree in the spirit, which is the baptism into the name of the holy spirit. This is what Paul declared that he had when he said:

8 From this time on there is reserved for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give me as a reward in that day, yet not only to me, but also to those who have loved his manifestation (2 Timothy 4).

James and Jesus refer to it as the crown of life:

12 Happy is the man that keeps on enduring trial, because on becoming approved he will receive the crown of life, which Jehovah promised to those who continue loving him (James 1).

10 Do not be afraid of the things you are about to suffer. Look! The Devil will keep throwing some of you into prison that you may be fully put to the test, and that you may have tribulation ten days. Prove yourself faithful even to death, and I will give you the crown of life (Revelation 2).

The process by which this crown is reserved is the baptism in holy spirit, which starts with the sanctification, this being the baptism into the name of the son. Then there is the period of test, this being a test of faith perfected by works. Then it ends with the sealing, which is the righteous decree from God, in the spirit, which is the baptism into the name of the holy spirit - see [12], [13].

15 And it is still more abundantly clear that with a similarity to Melchizedek there arises another priest,
16 who has become such, not according to the law of a commandment depending upon the flesh, but according to the power of an indestructible life,
17 for in witness it is said: You are a priest forever according to the manner of Melchizedek (Hebrews 7).

So Cainan would have had to have been sealed, declared righteous in spirit, i.e. possessing his own life, in order to have been clean to resurrect anybody, as were Peter and Paul. But it was impossible for an Adamic man to be sealed in the Alienation times, a period of 7 times, 2520 years, which ran from 2488Sivan, when God made the decree in Genesis 6:3, to Pentecost 33Sivan6 when the first post flood adamic humans were sealed - see [128], [129]. 

Therefore Cainan must have been non-adamic. So he fulfils the criteria of Hebrews 7:3 and Hebrews 7:6 , for Melchizedek:

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

6 But the man who did not trace his genealogy from them took tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the promises (Hebrews 7).

Furthermore he lived long enough to see Abraham. The LXX has him as living for 330 years after fathering Shelah. So if the LXX can be trusted, then Cainan was alive when Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek. So we could now deduce that Cainan was Melchizedek, and he was a non adamic son of Arpachshad. 

What is the Status of the LXX ?

Is the LXX an inspired account? Well, most of the New Testament quotes of the old testament are actually from the LXX, so certainly in these cases the quoted parts are inspired, but this does not mean that the original words were inspired. But in many places the new testament writers do not follow the LXX but supply a doctored version which is closer to a translation of the BHS. So is the LXX inspired? The answer to this question is provided by the holy spirit in Numbers 11 of the BHS:

25 Then Jehovah came down in a cloud and spoke to him and took away some of the spirit that was upon him and put it upon each of the 70 older men. And it came about that as soon as the spirit settled down upon them, then they proceeded to act as prophets; but they did not do it again (Numbers 11).

These 70 are the 70 men who translated the Law of Moses into Greek at Alexandria in the 3rd century BCE in the symbolic meaning we would suggest. In fact there may have been 72 men who translated the LXX into Greek in Alexandria between 284 and 247BC (According to Sir Lancelot Brenton LXX). But thereagain there was Eldad and Medad in Numbers 11:

24 After that Moses went out and spoke to the people the words of Jehovah. And he went gathering seventy men from the older men of the people and proceeded to have them stand round about the tent.
25 Then Jehovah came down in a cloud and spoke to him and took away some of the spirit that was upon him and put it upon each of the 70 older men. And it came about that as soon as the spirit settled down upon them, then they proceeded to act as prophets; but they did not do it again.
26 Now there were two of the men remaining in the camp. The name of the one was Eldad, and the name of the other was Medad. And the spirit began to settle down upon them, as they were among those written down, but they had not gone out to the tent. So they proceeded to act as prophets in the camp.
27 And a young man went running and reporting to Moses and saying: Eldad and Medad are acting as prophets in the camp!
28 Then Joshua the son of Nun, the minister of Moses from his young manhood on, responded and said: "My lord Moses, restrain them!
29 However, Moses said to him: Are you feeling jealous for me? No, I wish that all of Jehovah's people were prophets, because Jehovah would put his spirit upon them! (Numbers 11).

It is truly amazing that the ambiguity in Numbers 11 as to whether Eldad and Medad are to be taken in addition to the 70 men is reflected in our current historical uncertainty as to whether it was 70 or 72 men who translated the LXX. 

There is evidence that the law was translated first by the 70 and then the rest of the old testament was translated by others at a later date. This corresponds with the inspired statement that God took some of the spirit that was upon him [Moses] and put it upon each of the 70 older men, indicating that the LXX is inspired only in the law of Moses. We are saying that Numbers 11 is a prophecy that the law of Moses will be witnessed to by a further 70 men. We say this because the concept that the true God somehow did not have enough holy spirit to go around and so he had to remove some from Moses in order to have enough for the 70 older men is ridiculous. Since the true God ‘spoke to him and took away some of the spirit’, we must assume that by removing this spirit, he is then going to speak to the 70 men in the way that he spoke to Moses. Therefore the removing from Moses must mean that the inspired word of God through Moses needs to be completed by the words of a further 70 men [For Moses is now incomplete in holy spirit - Ed.]. These men therefore have to be the translators of the LXX, because we know of no other 70 who are candidates for speaking in an inspired way as a complement to Moses. So we deduce that the Pentateuch of the LXX is inspired, in one codex at the least.

Which Codex of the LXX is inspired, the LXX Codex Vaticanus or the LXX Codex Alexandrinus (in the British Museum) ?

We compare the BHS with the LXXv (Vaticanus) and the LXXa (Alexandrinus) as regards the History of Shem in Genesis 11. We put the LXXv in [brackets].

10 This is the history of Shem. Shem was 100 years old when he became father to Arpachshad 2 years after the deluge.
11 And after his fathering Arpachshad Shem continued to live 500 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
12 And Arpachshad lived 35 years. Then he became father to Shelah (in 2334).
13 And after his fathering Shelah Arpachshad continued to live 403 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
14 And Shelah lived 30 years. Then he became father to Eber.
15 And after his fathering Eber Shelah continued to live 403 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
16 And Eber lived on for 34 years. Then he became father to Peleg.
17 And after his fathering Peleg Eber continued to live 430 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
18 And Peleg lived on for 30 years. Then he became father to Reu.
19 And after his fathering Reu Peleg continued to live 209 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
20 And Reu lived on for 32 years. Then he became father to Serug.
21 And after his fathering Serug Reu continued to live 207 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
22 And Serug lived on for 30 years. Then he became father to Nahor.
23 And after his fathering Nahor Serug continued to live 200 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
24 And Nahor lived on for 29 years. Then he became father to Terah.
25 And after his fathering Terah Nahor continued to live 119 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
26 And Terah lived on for 70 years, after which he became father to Abram, Nahor and Haran (Genesis 11 - BHS)

Shem was 100 years old when he begat Arpachshad 2 years after the flood. And Shem lived after he had begat Arpachshad 500 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Arpachshad lived 135 years and begat Cainan. And Arpachshad lived after he begat Cainan 430 [400] years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Cainan lived 130 years and begat Sala (Shelah) and Cainan lived after he begat Shelah 330 years and begat sons and daughters and died. [Jehoiada and Cainan and Daniel were thought to have died, the human bodies died, but Melchizedek's spirit was raptured so as not to see death]
And Shelah lived 130 years and begat Heber (Eber). And Shelah lived after he begat Eber 330 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Eber lived 134 years and begat Peleg. And Eber lived after he begat Peleg 370 [270] years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Peleg 130 years and begat Ragau (Reu). And Peleg lived after he begat Reu 209 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Reu lived 132 years and begat Seruch (Serug). And Reu lived after he begat Serug 207 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Serug lived 130 years and begat Nahor. And Serug lived after he begat Nahor 200 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Nahor lived 79 years [179] years and begat Tarrha (Terah). And Nahor lived after he begat Terah 129 years [125] and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Terah lived 70 years and begat Abram Nahor and Haran (Genesis 11 - LXX).

Son

BHS Father’s age at birth of son

LXXa [LXXv] Generators age at 'birth' of son

BHS Years after fathering

LXXa [LXXv] Years after Generating physically (p) or spiritually (s)

Year of Birth of son (Tishri to Elul)

Arpachshad

100

100p

500

500p

2369

Cainan

 

135s

 

430p [400p]

2343 - 2338 

Shelah

35p

130s

403

330p/s?

2334

Eber

30p

130s

403

330p/s?

2304

Peleg

34p

134s

430

370p/s [270p/s]?

2270

Reu

30p

130s

209

209p/s

2240

Serug

32p

132s

207

207p/s

2208

Nahor

30p

130s

207

207p/s

2178

Terah

29p

79s [179s]

119

125p/s [129p/s]

2149

Abram, Nahor, Haran 70p 70p 205-70=135 135 2079

Melchizedek got a total of 600 years after Jared in Cainan (360??), Jehoiada (130), Daniel (106/7?) and Simeon (3/4?) being the greater Noah of Genesis 7.

We know from Stephen that:

4 Then he went out from the land of the Chaldeans and took up residence in Haran. And from there, after his father died, [God] caused him to change his residence to this land in which you now dwell (Acts 7).

We also know from the BHS that Terah died aged 205 years.

32 And the days of Terah came to be 205 years. Then Terah died in Haran (Genesis 11).

The LXXv has Nahor living for 308 years, which would mean that he was non adamic.
The LXXa has Eber living for 504 years, which would mean that he was non adamic.

In the table above:

p = Physical generation, fathering
s = Holy spirit baptism, generation, being born again as an angel

We resolve the apparent contradiction between the two accounts by realising that the priest of the family was the father, in the patriarchal times of Genesis 11, so he would baptise his sons. For the baptism into the name of the son, which is the sanctification in holy spirit, which is the gift of a clean conscience, a cleanliness of spirit, a temporary forgiveness of sins in the future, as opposed to a cleanliness of flesh, which is achieved by the bath of the flesh, and is a permanent forgiveness of sins in the past, is in fact the creation of an angel. This is how one becomes a son of God, literally - see [190]. This generation from above, is the generation that the LXX is referring to where it differs from the BHS. The next thing to realise is that whereas the BHS has ‘continued to live for x years’, the LXX has ‘and he died’. So it suffices for the total age in the BHS to be less than or equal to the total age in the LXX, because the father did not necessarily die at the end of the period as defined in the BHS, but he did at the end of the period as defined in the LXX.

Eber physically lived for at least 34+430=464 years according to the BHS. So the LXX Alexandrinus must be the inspired text, because 134+270=404 of the LXX Vaticanus, is too short. Furthermore the 370 years that Eber lived after he fathered/generated Peleg must be consecutive with the 134 years, the period before the spiritual generation, because 34+370=404 is again too short. So we know that Eber lived actually for 370 years after he baptised Peleg, which he did when he was 134 years old, so he lived for 504 years.

So the LXX Vaticanus is corrupt, as one might imagine from its location. Just this one discrepancy is enough given that one or other of the Alexandrinus and the Vaticanus is inspired and therefore perfect (for God must preserve one good copy it seems to us).

In the case of Shem, he lived for 500 years not after the baptism in holy spirit of Arpachshad, but after the physical birth of Arpachshad. So the living after the ‘generation’ in the LXX translation can be either after the physical generation or the spiritual generation. We have marked which one is which using ‘p’ and ‘s’ in the column.

The above reconciles the two accounts. And Cainan was a son, probably the firstborn, of Arpachshad. We know this because since Arpachshad baptised him when he was 135, he must have been his physical father, since the father was the family priest. Now Cainan must have resurrected Shelah before Shelah fathered Eber, which he did aged 30, in order that the genealogy of Luke holds true. Furthermore it is a divine principle that one cannot act as a priest until one is 30 years old. This is the law at Numbers 4 and was obeyed by both John the Baptist and Jesus, both of whom were non adamic priests. So Cainan would have to have been 30 before Shelah was 30. Since Arpachshad had Shelah when we was 35, and since nobody was fathering anybody much before they were 30 in the days of Shem, we can deduce that Arpachshad gave birth to Cainan when he was between 29 and 34, so Arpachshad did not live to be older than 480 years. For argument's sake we will assume he was 30. In which case Cainan was 5 years older than Shelah, so he could have resurrected Shelah when Shelah was 25, this would have been in the year starting 2309Tishri.

Now Cainan was non-adamic but he was not sanctified until Arpachshad was 135 years old, which would be too late for him to resurrect Shelah. Because to resurrect someone, you have to be declared righteous, and own your own life. Therefore we deduce that Cainan was possessed by an angel and this combination resurrected Shelah. This is in fact why Cainan was born non adamic, because he was going to be possessed by an angel.

So we now know that Cainan was Melchizedek and that Eber was non adamic and therefore possessed by either Michael or Gabriel (Melchizedek was in Cainan at the time). 

Incidentally even though the LXXa is inspired as far as the Torah is concerned, the first 5 books of Moses, this does not necessarily mean that it is written in the bible code. It may just have a true literal meaning.

Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael, the triple act

We know that Gabriel as John before Michael came as Jesus in the first century. We know that Melchizedek came as Cainan before either Gabriel or Michael came as Eber after the flood. We know that Jared, Enoch's father, housed either Melchizedek or Gabriel before Enoch housed Michael. And Methuselah, Enoch's son housed the other one after Enoch. So a pattern is emerging here of three appearances of Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael, in that order, with them all being around, or at least all three of their human vehicles being a round at the same time at some point. Now 'Jared' in Hebrew dry means 'descent' and 'Methuselah' means 'man of the missile', or 'man of the dart'. The former could apply either to Gabriel who descended as an angel or to Melchizedek, since he would have descended as an embryo. By 'Melchizedek', we mean the non adamic human in the pre flood system, who re-appeared as Melchizedek in the post flood system. Joseph and the first horseman of the apocalypse are both men of darts, having bows. Michael is a man of a sword, the second horseman. Joseph and Gordon have a priesthood related to Gabriel. Methusaleh died in the year of the flood. 

Now we know from Jesus' baptism by John, that an angel cannot just 'enter' a non adamic human, there must be a non adamic priest present. So Jared cannot have housed Gabriel, Melchizedek must have come first. So Jared was Melchizedek, and Methuselah housed Gabriel, after he had finished procreating. Holy angels do not procreate inside humans. And truly Jared was the first after Adam to be born from God after the manner of Adam, motherless, fatherless and without genealogy in the sense that he did not have true human parents, he would have had surrogate parents like Jesus. For Jesus is not called the SECOND ADAM, he is called the LAST ADAM. So Jesus was not the second Adam - Jared/Melchizedek was!! 

For the same reason that Gabriel cannot just posses a human without a priest presiding over his entrance, neither can Melchizedek. So in his appearances after Jared, Melchizedek just appears as himself in adult form one presumes, in order that he can preside over the entrance of Gabriel into his next non adamic host. In this way too, Melchizedek is fatherless, motherless and without genealogy. In fact Melchizedek keeps descending all by himself, hence the Hebrew name Jared. Now when the scripture sasy that Melchizedek had no beginning of days nor end of life it means that he did have a beginning of life and will have an end of days. His life began when he possessed Cainan, but this was not when his days began, they began in the pre-flood system in Jared. So Melchizedek in the peri-flood system had no beginning of days. Melchizedek lives forever, and in particular he lives longer than the earth does and so he does have an end of days (which days are defined by the earth) but not an end of life.

So who was the third of them at the time of Cainan and Eber? Well in the case of John the baptist we realised that anyone who is named by God before he is conceived in the womb is a son of God and not a son of Adam or his fleshly father. 

21 Now when eight days came to the full for circumcising him, his name was also called Jesus, the name called by the angel before he was conceived in the womb (Luke 2).

But Isaac fulfils this criterion:

15 And God went on to say to Abraham: As for Sarai your wife, you must not call her name Sarai, because Sarah is her name.
16 And I will bless her and [so] definitely give you a son from her; and I will bless her and [so] she shall become nations; kings of peoples will come from her.
17 At this Abraham fell upon his face and began to laugh and to say in his heart: Will a man 100 years old have a child born, and will Sarah, yes, will a woman 99 years old give birth?
18 After that Abraham said to the [true] God: O that Ishmael might live before you!
19
To this God said: Sarah your wife is indeed bearing you a son, and you must call his name Isaac. And I will establish my covenant with him for a covenant to time indefinite to his seed after him.
20 But as regards Ishmael I have heard you. Look! I will bless him and will make him fruitful and will multiply him very, very much. He will certainly produce 12 chieftains, and I will make him become a great nation.
21 However, my covenant I shall establish with Isaac, whom Sarah will bear to you at this appointed time next year (Genesis 17).

1 And Jehovah turned his attention to Sarah just as he had said, and Jehovah now did to Sarah just as he had spoken.
2 And Sarah became pregnant and then bore a son to Abraham in his old age at the appointed time of which God had spoken to him.
3 Accordingly Abraham called the name of his son who had been born to him, whom Sarah had borne to him, Isaac (Genesis 21).

So Jehovah called Abraham's son to be Isaac before Sarah became pregnant. So Isaac was non adamic. Isaac was born in 1918, and so was a contemporary of Cainan who lived for around 460 years and was born around 2340 so died around 1880 after Abraham as good as offered up Isaac. So Isaac was Michael after he had given birth to the twins. This is why Abimelech said to him:

29 You now are the blessed of Jehovah (Genesis 26).

In this case who was Melchizedek at the time of John and Jesus? 

25 And, look! there was a man in Jerusalem named Simeon, and this man was righteous and reverent, waiting for Israel's consolation, and holy spirit was upon him.
26 Furthermore, it had been divinely revealed to him by the holy spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Christ of Jehovah [hmm, he saw Michael in Enoch as Jared].
27 Under the power of the spirit he now came into the temple; and as the parents brought the young child Jesus in to do for it according to the customary practice of the law, 
28
he himself received it into his arms and blessed God and said:
29 Now, Sovereign Lord, you are letting your slave go free in peace according to your declaration;
30 because my eyes have seen your means of saving 
31
that you have made ready in the sight of all the peoples,  
32
a light for removing the veil from the nations and a glory of your people Israel.
33 And its father and mother continued wondering at the things being spoken about it.
34 Also, Simeon blessed them, but said to Mary its mother: Look! This one is laid for the fall and the rising again of many in Israel and for a sign to be talked against. 
35 Yes, a long sword will be run through the soul of you yourself, in order that the reasonings of many hearts may be uncovered (Luke 2).

Some Priest this Simeon. He didn't receive any pigeons after the manner of Aaron (the stipulated redemption sacrifice for a poor person under law in the case of a firstborn son on the 41st day, the 33rd after the circumcision) he received Jesus into his arms. He was a slave of God. One cannot help thinking that the one who sent John baptising was Simeon:

33 Even I did not know him, but the very one who sent me to baptize in water said to me: Whoever it is upon whom you see the spirit coming down and remaining, this is the one that baptizes in holy spirit (John 1).

The way this all works is that Melchizedek presides over the entrance of Gabriel and Gabriel presides over the entrance of Michael. Except the in first case when Melchizedek presided over the entrance of Michael into Enoch and then Enoch presided over the entrance of Gabriel into Methuselah.

Paul says of this great and amazingly complicated priest Melchizedek:

1 For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him and to whom Abraham apportioned a tenth from all things, is first of all, by translation:
2 King of Righteousness, and is then also king of Salem, that is: King of Peace.
3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.
4 Behold, then, how great this man was to whom Abraham, the family head, gave a tenth out of the chief spoils (Hebrews 7).

So here are 4 designations for him. And the King of Salem was the one who received one tenth of everything from Abraham. A prophetic gesture if ever there was one - see [43]. So the King of Righteousness was Jared, and the King of Peace, well, this must be a designation for the Kingdom of God. We will be seeing this one again, surely as the earthly King of the Kingdom of God.

Jehoiada, Elijah and Elisha

We know that Jehoiada was non adamic and was a priest. Now both Elijah and Elisha resurrected sons of Adam during the Alienation Times. 

21 And he proceeded to stretch himself upon the child 3 times and call to Jehovah and say: O Jehovah my God, please, cause the soul of this child to come back within him.
22 Finally Jehovah listened to Elijah's voice, so that the soul of the child came back within him and he came to life (1 Kings 17).

32 At last Elisha came into the house, and there the boy was dead, being laid upon his couch.
33 Then he came in and closed the door behind them both and began to pray to Jehovah.
34 Finally he went up and lay down upon the child and put his own mouth upon his mouth and his own eyes upon his eyes and his own palms upon his palms and kept bent over him, and gradually the child's flesh grew warm.
35 Then he began walking again in the house, once this way and once that way, after which he went up and bent over him. And the boy began to sneeze as many as 7 times, after which the boy opened his eyes (2 Kings 4).

It is not possible to resurrect a son of Adam, mediating life to him, unless you possess your own, which means that you are sealed in spirit, declared righteous in the spirit. This is what Paul declared that he had when he said:

8 From this time on there is reserved for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give me as a reward in that day, yet not only to me, but also to those who have loved his manifestation (2 Timothy 4).

James and Jesus refer to it as the crown of life:

12 Happy is the man that keeps on enduring trial, because on becoming approved he will receive the crown of life, which Jehovah promised to those who continue loving him (James 1).

And it was not possible for sons of Adam to get this declaration which is the baptism into the name of the holy spirit during the Alienation Times, which ran from 2488Sivan to 33Sivan - [128], [129]. So Elijah and Elisha were non adamic. We know that Elijah came first and handed over to Elisha when he ascended in the windstorm recorded in an incredibly prophetic account:

11 And it came about that as they were walking along, speaking as they walked, why, look! a fiery war chariot and fiery horses, and they proceeded to make a separation between them both; and Elijah went ascending in the windstorm to the heavens.
12 All the while Elisha was seeing it, and he was crying out: My father, my father, the war chariot of Israel and his horsemen!
And he did not see him anymore. Consequently he took hold of his own garments and ripped them into two pieces (2 Kings 2).

Jehoiada ordered the killing of Athaliah in 898, and Elijah was told to anoint both Jehu and Elisha in 905:

16 And Jehu the grandson of Nimshi you should anoint as king over Israel; and Elisha the son of Shaphat from Abel-meholah you should anoint as prophet in place of you (1 Kings 19).

For the chronology of this period see [91]. So Jehoiada, Elijah and Elisha were contemporaries. So Jehoiada was Melchizedek, Elijah was Gabriel and Elisha was Michael.

Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel

This is what God said to Jeremiah:

5 Before I was forming you in the belly I knew you, and before you proceeded to come forth from the womb I sanctified you. Prophet to the nations I made you (Jeremiah 1).

So Jeremiah had a previous existence, a previous soul in fact, either angelic or human. He was sanctified before he was born, so he was born again before he was born! This is only the case with non adamic humans. So Jeremiah was one of the three. The Gospels give us a clue as to which one:

13 Jesus went asking his disciples: Who are men saying the Son of man is?
14 They said: Some say John the Baptist, others Elijah, still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets (Matthew 16).

We know that Gabriel was in both Elijah and John, so we are presumably being told that Gabriel was in Jeremiah too. And that Gabriel was in another one of the prophets. There is a further reference to this in Luke:

7 Now Herod the district ruler heard of all the things happening, and he was in great perplexity because of its being said by some that John had been raised up from the dead, 
8
but by others that Elijah had appeared, but by still others that a certain one of the ancient prophets had risen (Luke 9).

So there must have been two contemporaries of Jeremiah who were Melchizedek and Michael. These are the only two prophets said to be 'son of man' not by men, but by God and by Gabriel:

17 Son of man, a watchman is what I have made you to the house of Israel, and you must hear from my mouth speech and you must warn them from me (Ezekiel 3).

17 So he came beside where I was standing, but when he came I got terrified so that I fell upon my face. And he proceeded to say to me: Understand, Oh son of man, that the vision is for the time of [the] end (Daniel 8).

The only other 'son of man' in the bible is Jesus. So what does it mean to be a 'son of man' ? Or like the crowd said:

Therefore the crowd answered him: We heard from the Law that the Christ remains forever; and how is it you say that the Son of man must be lifted up? Who is this Son of man? (John 12:34).
In our best understanding, 'son of man' means one who provides offspring in the form of man before he sinned, i.e. a further uncondemned Adam. Someone who provides indefinitely living human offspring. Michael certainly can do this, being the eternal father, as opposed to Adam, the temporary father:

6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9).

Melchizedek, being non adamic himself can also do this, one presumes. So we have Daniel and Ezekiel as Melchizedek and Michael.
But if Gabriel in Jeremiah is the prophet to the nations, then it must be Michael in Ezekiel who is the watchman to the house of Israel, for he was the prince of Israel according to Gabriel:

21 However, I shall tell you the things noted down in the writing of truth, and there is no one holding strongly with me in these [things] but Michael, the prince of you people (Daniel 10).

So Daniel was Melchizedek, and Ezekiel was Michael.

The 24 appearances of the three leading actors

So we have the 12 comings of the Christ as described in section [505], and we can enlarge this now to 24 comings in this system of Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael. 

Coming As Function Date
1st Enoch Train up for role as Christ After 3340 BC
2nd Isaac Patriarch After 1858 BC
3rd Prince of the army of Jehovah to Joshua Fight for the sons of Israel as they took the promised land by the sword. 1473Nisan BC
4th Elisha Prophesy Anointing of Jehu 905 BC
5th Ezekiel Prophesy 5th year of exile of Jehoiachin, 592 BC
6th Jesus Christ the son of Joseph Jesus Born to Mary and Joseph, who died at his baptism by John. 2Tishri10 (BC) -29Tishri10 AD
7th Michael in Jesus Messiah, validation sacrifice for the 1AC. Ministry and Ransom. Appoint FDS1 exclusively at Resurrection 29Tishri10-33Nisan16
8th Jesus Appoint FDS2 64Nisan - 67Tishri
9th Jesus Remove FDS2 200-450 AD ??
10th Jesus Appoint FDS3 1914Tishri - 1918Nisan
11th Jesus Appoint FDS4 1995Sivan30 - 1995Tishri17
12th Jesus with Gabriel and Melchizedek and the 288,000 New covenant and 2nd New covenant saints, in fact the whole cast Final revealing of God to mankind 2008Iyyar29

 

Triple appearance Melchizedek Gabriel Michael
1st Jared Methuselah Enoch
2nd Cainan Eber Isaac
3rd Jehoiada Elijah Elisha
4th Daniel Jeremiah Ezekiel
5th Simeon John the Baptist Jesus
6th during Armageddon Melchizedek Gabriel Michael

So we have 6 triple appearances and 6 more comings of the Christ making 24 appearances in all.

In fact Michael in Enoch was transferred so as not to see death in the first triple appearance in this system, and Gabriel in John the Baptist, was transferred so as not to see death in the last triple appearance in this system (the 6th triple appearance is in the Kingdom of God).