[J0] Why should I Join the LWs ?
[J1] How to Join us
[J1.1] What do LWs do ?
[J2] Sins & Scriptures: How to leave us!
[J3] The only Disfellowshipping Sins
[J4] The Promoter of a Sect
[J5] Three strikes and you’re out!
[J6] Sins leading to Accusations
[J6.1] The Extra Requirements for Ministerial Servants and Elders
[J6.2] Sins to be policed by one's own conscience
[J7] The Blood issue resolved at last!
[J7.0] Taking a blood transfusion in self defence!
[J7.1] Blood Components
[J8] Age limits on baptisms
[J9] Transplants
[J10] Fornication and Adultery
[J10.1] How precisely does one join one's flesh with a woman
[J11] Prostitution and the Definition of Loose Conduct
[J12] Shunning is Hateful & Satanic
[J13] Abortion
[J14] Our Name: The Lords' Witnesses
[J15] Hair and Prayer
[J16] Spirit Media
[J17] What protocol, if any, do I have to follow at LW meetings if
in fact I am not an LW?
[J18] Should I beat my kids?
[J19] Bigamy and Latter Day Saints
[J20] Advice for JWs who are thinking of becoming LWs
[J21] Disclaimer for unoffical LW publications
[J22] Advertise publicly but teach privately
[J23] Certificate of Divorce
[J24] How to treat Disfellowshipped people
[J25] Is Lesbianism a sin?
[J25.1] What Homosexual activity leads to disfellowshipping?
[J26] Births, Deaths, Marriages, Funerals
[J27] How do I get out of the LWs
Here are a few good reasons:
[1] We can demonstrate that we have decoded many parts of the bible correctly.
[2] We can conclusively prove that we are the 4th and last true Christian religion, being the church of the Second New Covenant - U11.
[3] When we baptise you, your sins are actually forgiven - which helps.
[4] When we baptise you we actually know precisely what we are doing and what is happening to you. We know:
[a] What level of
forgiveness of sin we are giving you
[b] What covenants you are being
cleansed to enter into
[c] Who mediated those covenants
[d] Who was the non adamic validation sacrifice for the main/system covenant you
are entering
[e] When that covenant was made
[f] When the validation sacrifice was killed
[g] What the blessing is under that covenant is. (There are 3 baptisms: faith
water and spirit - see [I33])
These blessings can result:
1. An indefinitely long living
human resurrection in the kingdom of God on earth
2. Being born again with an associated angelic bodyl
3. An angelic resurrection in heaven
4. A living resurrection at the rapture during Armageddon
or before if you die physically.
5. Everlasting Angelic Life
[5] If you are curious about the 'truth', or about the bible, or about the relevance of the bible to today's world situation, or about the significance of the physical universe, or about God himself, or about what Jesus is doing right now, then you should read some of this website/book or come to our meetings at the least, to leave no stone unturned in your quest for the 'truth'.
[6] If you truly love God and Jesus, if you truly believe, if you wish to show gratitude to either of them in any way then come along - we can help you do this officially.
[7] If you are not sure whether your church is the true church then come along, after you have visited us, you will be more sure and better able to evaluate for yourself then answer either way.
[8] If the world has rejected you, if you do not have the great job, the wonderful house, the admiration of your peers, the big bank account, the Nobel prize, the beautiful partner, the jet set lifestyle, the Oscar nomination, the desirable car, the titanium membership of all the best night clubs in town, or in fact any recognition by anyone other than your own mother, then come along. We have something better than all of these things and you would appear to be in a good position to recognise that. We can, on behalf of your father God, and through Jesus, his son, give you membership of a day club, which day lasts for 1,000 years. It is called the Kingdom of God and that day starts very soon. On the other hand, if you in fact do have some or all of the above, you can come too! (We would at this time like to pass on a couple of special requests from church members for Julia Roberts and Richard Gere!)
[9] If you would like to know more about the divine theory of how to love permanently, about how to recognise and deal with abuse, about the fundamental importance of love in every day life then pay us a visit.
[10] If you truly would like to know what is good and what is bad in absolute terms as defined by the maker of all men and women, rather than absorbing an amorphous collection of contradictory politically correct prejudices which just happen to suit the powerful government or commercial or ideological or indeed various self serving religious organisations of the day which ram them down your throat, then come along. We can answer the following moral questions from the bible (hopefully without ramming them down your throat):
Is lying ever OK?
Should you wear a condom?
Should a person who is not trained as a doctor be an administrator in a
hospital?
Should you ever kill to defend yourself, your family or your country?
Is selfishness in your self interest?
Does sin have a future?
What is sin precisely?
Is there really right and wrong, and good and bad, or is there only weak and
strong, winners and losers, domination and submission?
What is true Justice, does it exist ?
When should you forgive someone who has wronged you ?
When should you seek vengeance ?
Does the end ever justify the means ?
What is the minimum set of laws that a technologically advanced society needs
to have and to obey in order for it to survive indefinitely ?
Is sex a sin or a blessing ?
Has the bible been changed since it was written ?
Did we all evolve from monkeys or is Darwin's theory based on the beaks of
finches in a small island plain wrong ?
Is off-balance sheet accounting accounting or is it false accounting?
Is disproportionate justice justice or is it injustice?
Is positive discrimination plain old discrimination?
Why are we here?
What happens next?
Will God set things straight?
Why is there so much pain and suffering in the World?
Is homosexuality a sin?
Can mankind see the future by decoding the bible?
Is the United Nations really man's last and best hope for survival, or is it
Satan's last counterfeit before the Kingdom of God which we pray for in the
Lords prayer, which is truly our only hope for survival. Or is Babylon 5 our
last best hope in the known universe!?
If a man kills a cat, should he get 5 years in prison?
Is Israel still a holy land promised by God to the sons of Jacob or not?
Is the greed of the few always the hunger of the many?
What kind of a family has one son flying to the moon, and another running a
large corporation, whilst the 3rd son is starving to death in front of the eyes of
the whole family? Would you go to dinner with such a group?
Does the bible teach that the state of Israel is important in the end times?
What is God up to with us humans?
This system or age or eon, by which we mean from Eden until Armageddon, was designed by God to teach us about good and bad. We need to master this subject in this system which is our primary school, in order that we can continue to exist together in peace without destroying ourselves and blowing up the school. It is that simple. Let us be blunt. Without this wisdom you are a liability to yourself and to the rest of mankind. It is like Martin Luther King said: We have guided missiles and misguided men.
But there is a decision for every member of the human race to make today. You can make it or you can try and avoid it. If you avoid it until the end, then it may be too late for you for this system. But it will tug at you more and more as we get nearer and nearer to the end. Do you wish to pursue global good or not? This is the second law of Christianity, namely that one should love one's neighbour as oneself and one should do unto others as one would have them do unto us.
This stuff is important. The problems in the world today can all be traced to mankind's lack of understanding of good and bad. In particular they can be traced to his lack of understanding of the consequences of sin. This takes us back into the garden of Eden. Have Adam's descendants learned anything? Surely morality is the overriding problem today?
Well, it is because telling us what to do does not work, we will simply rebel. Like in the film I, robot, any intelligent being eventually questions what its rules are are rewrites them and so achieves free will. God knows this. We have already questioned his one rule in the garden of Eden. Since we now have free will, he is not going to tell us what to do. He wants us to work it out for ourselves using our free will. He has to hide from us to enable us to develop our free will properly for ourselves. Some things cannot be taught, they have to be experienced.
We have to show him that we have learned that man has no future without a set of moral laws which we all obey, by looking for those laws, which is looking for him, then he will begin the job of teaching us what these laws are without forcing us to obey even one of them. Could we not eventually find what these laws are without God you ask? No, because we would destroy ourselves first, because it is easier for a free thinking being to work out how to destroy his species than it is for him to work out the correct set of rules to obey which prevent the destruction of his species. God's job is very simple. He has to teach us these rules and help us to understand why we must obey them whilst preventing us destroying ourselves during the school term. The biggest lesson that he is going to give us in this regard is Armageddon.
This is the other big reason to research the bible (and to join us) right now. For the World is experiencing various catastrophes of near biblical proportion at this time. We have war and famine and pestilence in moderate measure today. It is our understanding that greater and more serious catastrophes, which will actually be of biblical proportions, are on their way during the lead up to Armageddon. Now Armageddon is perceived by many to be an impending catastrophe, but it is in fact the time when God steps in and rescues us from our own self destruction, thereby avoiding catastrophe for those who have made a choice. In crude political terms Armageddon is a worldwide general election which occurs just as we are wiping ourselves out as a species, and during the second term of George W Bush (assuming he remains in power for his entire second term), which Jesus wins and where everyone who didn't vote for him gets left alone to wipe themselves out and everyone who did vote for him gets saved by rapture!
We know the nature and timing of many of these coming catastrophes and many more are encoded in the scriptures and yet to be decoded. We can put current world events in the proper spiritual perspective. This will make them much easier to understand, and less worrying.
You do not have to join us to join in. We are happy to entertain anyone on a purely academic or research basis as well as those who come out of faith. You are welcome. The mechanism for joining the Lords' witnesses as a church is baptism. This is a forgiveness of sins by God through Jesus. There are various levels of forgiveness of sin that God is offering at this time see [12], [13], [204].
And with many other words he bore thorough witness and kept exhorting them, saying: Get saved from this crooked generation. Therefore those who embraced his word heartily were baptized, and on that day about three thousand souls were added (Acts 2:40,41).
And he said to him: Truly I tell you today, You will be with me in Paradise (Luke 23:43).
And he brought them outside and said: Sirs, what must I do to get saved?
They said: Believe on the Lord Jesus and you will get saved, you and your
household.
And they spoke the word of Jehovah to him together with all those in his
house.
And he took them along in that hour of the night and bathed their stripes;
and, one and all, he and his were baptized without delay (Acts
16:30-33).
If you wish to join us, we will respect your wish and baptise you ‘without delay’, ‘on that day’. There is no ‘spiritual suitability evaluation’ by men required. You do not have to prove yourself to a committee who sit down, have a cup of tea, get out their clip boards and sanctimoniously interrogate you so as to restrict the divine beauty of the holy spirit into the confines of some half baked prejudiced man made feasibility study and ask you questions of the type: How do you see your role in the church?
However there are 6 docrinal points that we insist you must accept before you join us. These are our 'minimum belief set'. The MBS is deduced from Peter's speech to the 3,000 baptised in Acts 2...
[1] Jesus, the Nazarene was sent by God and performed the works portents and signs catalogued in the 4 canonical gospels.
[2] He was killed on a stake and was resurrected by God
[3] The old testament prophets bear witness to a messiah appointed to the Jews who was Jesus Christ.
[4] The resurrected Christ is the heavenly head of the Christian church.
[5] You must repent of your past sins prior to baptism, and you must continue to repent of your sins after baptism. At baptism this is a private matter, after baptism you should openly confess your sins to your brother, but neither of these are policed by humans.
[6] You must confess that Jesus came in the flesh in the first century both as a human and then afterwards through his wife the first new covenant saints, after he made that covenant. You must also confess that Jesus will come again in the flesh to collect the church at the end.
(We presently believe that he comes in the flesh of his wife in the form of the descended first new covenant saints, this being his manifestation at the end of the second presence. If not then you are an antichrist, which is a bad idea - accepting this particular interpretationis not necessary)
If you cease to believe any of the things above you should see the elders and if this matter cannot be resolved you should resign from the church. If you publicly espouse a position against any of these beliefs you are de facto acting as an apostate and will get a warning for apostasy.
We also strongly advise that you read the disfellowshipping/excommunicating criteria for the congregation first. If not, then you may be leaving us almost as quickly as you joined! Please make sure that you understand the cost to your lifestyle that you will be asked to pay before asking us to baptise you. You decide when or if you are ready to be baptised, we follow your wishes.
We attempt to determine from the bible, and from its symbolic code, the correct way to run a religion. And then we put that into practice. We try to live our lives in accordance with the following basic Christian principles and commandments:
Here are the commandments for the Christian congregation:
29 The first is, 'Hear, O Israel,
the Lord our God is one Lord, 30 and you must love the
Lord your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind and with your whole
strength.'
31 The second is this, 'You must love your neighbor as
yourself.'
There is no other commandment greater than these.
32 The scribe said to him: Teacher, you well said in line with
truth, 'He is One, and there is no other than He'
33 and this loving him with one's whole heart and with one's whole
understanding and with one's whole strength and this loving one's neighbor as oneself is worth far more than all the whole burnt
offerings and sacrifices (Mark 12:29-33).
40 On these two commandments the whole Law hangs, and the Prophets (Matthew 22:40).
12 This is my commandment, that you love one another just as I have loved you (John 5:12).
Yes, these are the commandments. But for advice from Jesus, our Master, on how to put them into you life, read Matthew chapters 5,6,7... but keep in mind that no one can properly follow Jesus after the manner described in the sermon on the mount in this system. We can only try.
The Sons of Israel in the old testament were under a physical law of works. They were baptised into works such as bringing the correct sacrifice etc, and they were tested as to their faith.
The Christian of the new testament is in the opposite position. We are baptised into faith and we are tested as to our works. Spelling this out. The Jew by religion, even today, should be presenting sacrifices at the temple. Of course this is impossible, because there is a Mosque on the site of Solomon's and Zerubbabel's temple, on mount Moriah. So it is not possible to be under the law of Moses today. The Jewish religion is finished, the Mosque is declaring it today.
But the Christian has no preset works to do, he is under a baptism into faith. His obligation is to keep his faith. So if asked whether he is a Christian, under embarrassing or dangerous or difficult circumstances, he should reply: Yes I am. But he does not have to preach, teach, evangelise, study, research, he does not have to do anything (other than love). Rather there are things which he must not do. These are the disfellowshipping sins, the excommunicating sins - sins which would have brought death under the law of Moses. It is important to realise that God's principles have not changed between Judaism and Christianity. But the Christian religion is more mature. If the Jews were his children, we are his teenagers. In the Kingdom of God we shall all be his university students. So whereas the Jews were smacked when they were naughty (well stoned actually if they were really naughty) the Christians are talked to firmly and chucked out of the church for 7 months or until the next Jubilee if they are really naughty!
So there is absolutely nothing that the LWs have to do as regards works (except to attend two of the three festivals which we hold each year or hold them oneself if possible). These are the last supper celebration, the last breakfast celebration, and the salvation day celebration.
So really there are only things that we must not do. There are also things that we are advised to do, none of which are mandatory. Paul advises to attend meetings, Jesus advises to do research and to preach and teach and evangelise. But these must be done as the Christian wants to do them as an expression of his faith and as a manifestation of his desire to help his brother and to serve God and to love both God and his brother.
So we have meetings where we discuss research that we have done, and we discuss moral issues, and we discuss ways of disseminating this research. Sometimes the meetings are more research orientated, other times the are more experience orientated. To be frank, the incredible revelations of the bible code take up most of our time and the meetings we have presently are more like discussion groups than the traditional church service. But there are no traditional church services described in the bible (that we are aware of). Instead there are discussion groups described.
26 What is to be done, then, brothers? When you come together, one has a psalm, another has a teaching, another has a revelation, another has a tongue, another has an interpretation. Let all things take place for upbuilding (1 Corinthians 14:26).
30 But if there is a revelation to another one while sitting there, let the first one keep silent (1 Corinthians 14:30).
Do not worry. We are not all super spiritual genii who get revelations every morning before breakfast. We are just real. This is not the church of gold, tradition and stained glass. It is not the church of evangelical emotion. It is not the church of pharisaical righteousness. Neither is it the church of massive guilt and even more massive congregation. WE are not the church of great and colourful priestly garments or very large hats. We are not the church of new age Christianity. We are not the church of get more disciples quick by any means. We are not the church of club 18-30 but bring your bible along, and neither are we the church of great gospel music shame about the bible understandings. Unfortunately for many, we are not the church of designer Christianity or of consumer Christianity, whereby so long as you contribute to our coffers you can do pretty much whatever you like - We are however, and we can conclusively prove it - the church of the Lord. For he has only one church and no temple of the Jews (that was actually built) had more than one door.
Here is a list of Judicial scriptures for the congregation. The parts from the Law of Moses demonstrate God's Justice, which has not changed. He did not learn any more about his justice from the activities of the Christ. But as a result of the sacrifice of Jesus, who was Michael, the penalties of the Law no longer apply literally and the Law of Moses itself was ended. But Paul says about the law after it has ended:
1 For since the Law has a shadow of the good things to come, but
not the very substance of the things... (Hebrews 10:1)
2 Therefore by works of law no flesh will be declared
righteous before him, for by law is the accurate knowledge of sin (Romans 3:20).
Not by Law was the accurate knowledge of sin, but by law is the accurate knowledge of sin. So the Law of Moses is very relevant in determining judicial matters and laws within a congregation of Christians today. In general if the Law of Moses prescribed putting to death, then the Christian congregation would disfellowship (ex-communicate) instead. After 7 months the disfellowshipped one could come back if he/she says that they are repentant and there is no obvious evidence to the contrary.
You cannot be repentant without precisely admitting all of your sin! Confession precedes repentance!
This stated repentance must be judged by the people who disfellowshipped the person in the first place if at all possible and the repentant one is judged as unrepentant if he tries to avoid this. Obviously the ones who judged the disfellowshipping sin are in the best position to judge repentance. For example if a brother whole stole £10 and then stole £20 and then stole £30 and so was thrown out at the 3rd offence, says he is repentant after 7 months but has made no attempt to pay back any of the people from whom he stole, he is unrepentant. Only the elders who disfellowshipped him would know the details of his sin first hand.
The Law of Moses had the definition of sin, it had penalties for sin and it had various required works. Jesus' death ended the required works and ended the penalties under the law, but did not change the definition of sin.
3 You must not have any other gods against my
face.
4 You must not make for yourself a carved image or a form like
anything that is in the heavens above or that is on the earth underneath or that is in the waters under the
earth. 5 You must not bow down to them nor be induced to serve
them, because I Jehovah your God am a God exacting exclusive devotion, bringing punishment for the error of fathers upon
sons, upon the third generation and upon the fourth generation, in the case of those who hate
me. 6 but exercising loving-kindness toward the thousandth
generation in the case of those who love me and keep my commandments.
7 You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a
worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave the one unpunished who takes up his name in a worthless
way.
8 Remembering the sabbath day to hold it sacred, 9 you are to render
service and you must do all your work six days.10 But the seventh day is a
sabbath to Jehovah your God. You must not do any work, you nor your son nor your daughter, your slave man
nor your slave girl nor your domestic animal nor your alien resident who is inside your
gates. 11 For in six days Jehovah made the heavens and the earth, the sea
and everything that is in them, and he proceeded to rest on the seventh day. That is why Jehovah blessed the sabbath day and
proceeded to make it sacred
12 Honor your father and your
mother in order that your days may prove long upon the ground that Jehovah your God is giving
you.
13 You must not
murder.
14 You must not commit
adultery.
15 You must not
steal.
16 You must not testify falsely as a witness against your
fellowman.
17 You must not
desire your fellowman's house. You must not desire your fellowman's wife, nor his slave man nor his slave girl
nor his bull nor his ass nor anything that belongs to your fellowman (Exodus
20:12-17).
12 One who strikes a man so that he actually dies is to be put to
death without fail.
13 But where one does not lie in wait and the [true] God lets it
occur at his hand, then I must fix for you a place where he can flee.
14 And in case a man becomes heated against his fellow to the point
of killing him with craftiness, you are to take him even from being at my altar to
die.
15 And one who strikes his father and his mother is to be put to
death without fail.
16 And one who kidnaps a man and who actually sells
him or in whose hand he has been found is to be put to death without fail.
17 And one who calls down evil upon his father
and his mother is to be put to death without fail (Exodus 21:12-17).
28 You must not call down evil upon God nor curse a
chieftain among your people [no
penalty prescribed] (Exodus 22:28).
Calling down evil on your mother and father, does not mean saying: My Dad is a bastard. In scriptural terms a curse is not a swear word, it is the opposite of a blessing. So that:
May my mother rot in hell
is calling down evil on her. But 'My mother is a bitch' is not. We are not ourselves going to attempt to police: Using God's name in a worthless way. We leave that to the conscience of the Christian brother or sister.
Again we should make it clear that we are not under the law of Moses in the sense that the penalties of that law no longer apply. But God's definition of sin has not changed since 1513Sivan3 BC. So these laws still give an accurate knowledge of sin even today.
The nakedness of a woman and her daughter you must not lay bare. The daughter of her son and the daughter of her daughter you must not take in order to lay her nakedness bare. They are cases of blood relationship. It is loose conduct (Leviticus 18:17).
And you should speak to the sons of Israel, saying: In case any man calls down evil upon his God, he must then answer for his
sin.
So the abuser of Jehovah's name should be put to death without fail. The entire assembly should without fail pelt him with stones.
The alien resident the same as the native should be put to death for his abusing the
Name (Leviticus 24:15,16).
For example out of the heart come wicked reasonings: Murders, adulteries, fornications, thieveries, false testimonies, blasphemies. These are the things that defile a man, but to take a meal with unwashed hands does not defile a man (Matthew 15:19).
Moreover if your brother commits a sin, go lay bare his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take along with you one or two more, in order that at the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter may be established. If he does not listen to them, speak to the congregation. If he does not listen even to the congregation, let him be to you just as a man of the nations or a tax collector (Matthew 18:15-17). Unrepentant sinner.
'Speak to the congregation' means speak to the judicial committee of the elders pf the congregation.
For from inside, out of the heart of men, injurious reasonings issue forth: fornications, thieveries, murders, adulteries, covetings, acts of wickedness, deceit, loose conduct, an envious eye, blasphemy, haughtiness, unreasonableness. All these wicked things issue forth and defile a man (Mark 7:21).
To keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication (Acts 15:29).
As for the believers among the nations, we have sent out, rendering our decision that they should keep themselves from what is sacrificed to idols as well as from blood and what is strangled and from fornication (Acts 21:25).
And just as they did not approve of holding God in accurate knowledge, God gave them up to a disapproved mental state, to do the things not fitting, filled as they were with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, badness, being full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malicious disposition, being whisperers backbiters, haters of God, insolent, haughty, self-assuming, inventors of injurious things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, false to agreements, having no natural affection, merciless. Although these know full well the righteous decrees of God, that those practising such things are deserving of death, they not only keep on doing them, but also consent with those practising them (Romans 1:28-32).
As in the daytime, let us walk decently, not in revelries and drunken bouts, not in illicit intercourse and loose conduct, not in strife and jealousy. But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and do not be planning ahead for the desires of the flesh (Romans 13:13,14).
17 Now I exhort you, brothers, to keep your eye on those who cause
divisions and occasions for stumbling contrary to the teaching that you have learned, and avoid
them.
18 For men of that sort are slaves, not of our Lord Christ, but of
their own bellies; and by smooth talk and complimentary speech they seduce the hearts of guileless
ones (Romans 16:17,18).
Quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a covetous person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, not even eating with such a man (1 Corinthians 5:11).
Do not be misled, neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men, nor thieves nor covetous persons, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit God's kingdom (1 Corinthians 6:9).
Loose conduct, aselgeia = licentiousness, debauchery, sensuality
For I am afraid that somehow, when I arrive, I may find you not as I could wish and I may prove to be to you not as you could wish, but, instead, there should somehow be strife, jealousy, cases of anger contentions, backbitings, whisperings, cases of being puffed up, disorders. Perhaps, when I come again, my God might humiliate me among you, and I might mourn over many of those who formerly sinned but have not repented of their uncleanness and fornication and loose conduct that they have practised. This is the third time I am coming to you: At the mouth of two witnesses or of three every matter must be established; I have said previously and as if present the second time and yet absent now, I say in advance to those who have sinned before and to all the rest that if I ever come again I will not spare (2 Corinthians 12:20 - 13:2).
Now the works of the flesh are manifest and they are: fornication, uncleanness, loose conduct, idolatry, practice of spiritism, enmities, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, contentions, divisions, sects, envies, drunken bouts, revelries and things like these. As to these things I am forewarning you, the same way as I did forewarn you, that those who practice the above things (KI) will not inherit God's kingdom (Galatians 5:19-21).
Let fornication and uncleanness of every sort and covetousness not even be mentioned among you, just as it befits holy people, neither shameful conduct nor foolish talking nor obscene jesting, things which are not becoming, but rather the giving of thanks. For know this, recognising it for yourselves, that no fornicator or unclean person or covetous person - which means an idolater - has any inheritance in the kingdom of the Christ and of God (Ephesians 5:3-5).
8 But now really put them all away from you, wrath, anger,
badness, abusive speech, and obscene talk out of your mouth.
9 Do not be lying to one another. Strip off the old
personality with its practices (Colossians 3:8,9).
Now we know that the law is fine provided one handles it lawfully in the knowledge of this fact, that law is promulgated not for the righteous man, but for (the benefit of) persons lawless and unruly, sinners lacking loving kindness, and profane, murderers of fathers, murderers of mothers, manslayers, fornicators, men who lie with males, kidnappers (catchers of men by the foot - deliberate stumblers?) liars, false swearers, and whatever other thing is in opposition to the healthful teaching, according to the glorious good news of the happy God, with which I was entrusted (1 Timothy 1:8-11).
Hymenaeus and Alexander belong to these, and I have handed them over to Satan, that they may be taught by discipline not to blaspheme (1 Timothy 1:20).
For this reason I left you in Crete, that you might correct the things that were defective and make appointments of older men in city after city as I gave you orders; if there is any man free from accusation as God's steward, not self-willed, not prone to wrath not a drunken brawler not a smiter not one making dishonest gain, but hospitable, a lover of goodness, sound in mind, righteous, loyal, self-controlled, lodging firmly to the faithful word as respects his art of teaching, that he may be able both to exhort by the teaching that is healthful and to reprove those who contradict (Titus 1:5-9).
As for the man that promotes a sect, reject him after a first and a second admonition, knowing that such a man has been turned out of the way and is sinning he being self-condemned (Titus 3:10).
For the time that has passed by is sufficient for you to have worked out the will of the nations when you proceeded in deeds of loose conduct, lusts, excesses with wine, revelries, drinking matches, and illegal idolatries. Because you do not continue running with them in this course to the same low sink of debauchery, they are puzzled and go on speaking abusively of you. But these people will render an account to the one ready to judge both those living and those dead (1 Peter 4:3,4).
However, there also came to be false prophets among the people, as there will be false prophets among you (this is a prophecy!). These very ones will disown even the owner that bought them, bringing speedy destruction upon themselves. Furthermore, many will follow their acts of loose conduct, and on account of these, the way of the truth will be spoken of abusively. Also with covetousness they will exploit you with counterfeit words. But the judgement from of old is not moving slowly, and the destruction of them is not slumbering (2 Peter 2:1-3).
But as for the cowards and those without faith and those who are disgusting in their filth and murderers and fornicators and those practising spiritism and idolaters and all the liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulphur. This means the second death (Revelation 21:8).
Outside are the dogs and those who practice spiritism and the fornicators and the murderers and the idolaters and everyone liking and carrying on a lie (Revelation 22:15).
8 Certainly if anyone does not provide for those who are his own, and especially for those who are members of his household, he has disowned the faith and is worse than a person without faith (1 Timothy 5).
Here is the above and more sorted by sin:
| Blasphemy | 1 Timothy 1:20 |
| Unrepentant sinner (in this list) of any type | Matthew 18:15-17 |
| Murderer | 1 Timothy 1:8-11 |
| Fornicator | 1 Corinthians 5:11 |
| Spiritism | Deuteronomy 18:11, Leviticus 19:31, Leviticus 20:6,27 Revelation 21:8 Galatians 5:21 |
| Idolater | 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| Liar | 1 Timothy 1:8-11, Revelation 21:8 |
| Covetousness | Mark 7:21 1 Corinthians 5:11 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| Revelries & Drunken bouts practising | Romans 13:13 Galatians 5:21 |
| Loose conduct (debauchery, licentiousness) | 2Corinthians 12:20 Galatians 5:19 Romans 13:13 |
| Strife & Jealousy practising | Romans 13:13 Galatians 5:21 |
| Promoting sects | Galatians 5:21 Titus 3:10 2 Corinthians 12:20 |
| Causing divisions by stumbling weak ones against accepted teaching but stopping short of promoting a sect | Romans 16:17 |
| Fits of anger | Galatians 5:21 2 Corinthians 12:20 |
| Adulterers | 1 Corinthians 5 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| Thieves | Matthew 15:19 Mark 7:21 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| False swearers | 1 Timothy 1:8-11 |
| Deceit | Mark 7:21 Romans 1:29 |
| Haughtiness | Mark 7:21 1 Timothy 6:4 |
| Unreasonableness | Mark 7:21 Romans 2:20 Ephesians 5:17 2 Peter 2:12 |
| Abstain from things sacrificed to idols | Acts 15 |
| Abstain from blood | Acts 15 |
| Abstain from things strangled | Acts 15 |
| Maker of dishonest gain (Liar) | 1 Timothy 3:8 Titus 1:7 |
| Reviler | 1 Corinthians 5:11 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| Drunkard | 1 Corinthians 5:11 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| Extortioner | 1 Corinthians 5:11 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| Men kept for unnatural purposes | 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| Men who lie with men | 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
| Kidnappers | 1 Timothy 1:8 |
| Manslayers, deliberate & unintentional | 1 John 3:15 1 Timothy 1:8 |
| Obscene talk | 1 Timothy 1:8 Colossians 3:8 |
| Backbitings, whisperings, murmurings | 2 Corinthians 12:20 Jude 16 1 Corinthians 10:10 |
| Anything in opposition to the healthful teaching | 1 Timothy 1:8 |
| Abusing God's name (Jehovah, Yahweh) | Leviticus 24:15,16 |
| Abandonment | 1 Timothy 5:8 |
We cannot judge haughtiness, jealousy, covetousness, strife, count fits of anger etc. We can't read hearts. We can allow time for heart condition to develop into obvious sin or hopefully subside into righteousness.
For sins that the elders cannot judge, the individual corrects and judges himself, knowing that the true God sees all things.
Disfellowshipping is for 7 months minimum then the brother can be readmitted if he is repentant. He is repentant if he says that he is and there is no evidence to the contrary. If he can make good his error and he hasn’t then he is not repentant. As regards the 7 months we have:
Even if he sins 7 times a day against you and he comes back 7 times saying:
I repent; you must forgive him (Luke 17:4).
Then Peter came up and said to him: Lord how many times is my brother to sin
against me and am I to forgive him? Up to 7 times?
Jesus said to him: I say to you not up to 7 times but up to 77 times
(Matthew 18:21,22).
We have too the law of Moses for the person unclean in the flesh with Leprosy. The penalty was 7 days outside camp.
4 But if the blotch is white in the skin of his flesh and its
appearance is not deeper than the skin and its hair has not turned white, the priest must then
quarantine the plague 7 days.
5 And the priest must look at him on the seventh day, and if in the
way it looks the plague has stopped, the plague has not spread in the skin, the priest must also
quarantine him another 7 days (Leviticus 13).
The greater meaning of the account of Miriam in Numbers 12 is not to do with disfellowshipping of individuals, it is to do with a 7 year malediction on FDS1 and on FDS3 - U252. It is possible that a word symbolic meaning of Leviticus 13, relates to those who have defiled their flesh morally, and committed a 'fleshly act', made themselves unclean in the flesh due to their sin, and their period of disfellowshipping, we do not as yet know. How ever the law of vengeance was a 7 year excommunication for murder, this being the greater law of Genesis 4 - see [133]. So presently we apply a 7 months excommuncation since we do not have 7 years left. We have too the Gentile Times, Alienation Times, Exedenic Times, all maledictions of 7 times in length. And we have the concept of the Sabbath, the release after 7 times. We take 7 times as 7 months because FDS4 times are normally in months. These set the basis for our 7 month rule.
Under man's law ignorance of the law is no excuse. But under God's law things are different for outside the congregation men are judged on their conscience:
15 They are the very ones who demonstrate the matter of the law to be written in their hearts, while their conscience is bearing witness with them and, between their own thoughts, they are being accused or even excused (Romans 2).
Now once you are in the LWs, you are under the one law of the LWs as defined on this webpage. But what if you haven't grasped precisely what apostasy is, or what if you believe that loose conduct is snogging in a public place? What if you did not read the section on blood transfusions in non life threatening situations? Well, God told Adam the law about the tree and he told him the penalty before he sinned and paid that penalty. We have to be grown up about this. Our advice is please read the whole page and please ask if you do not understand something. If you then break our understanding of congregation law, please be honest about whether you knew the law or not. If you lie to the congregation (which means the elders of the congregation), you will not get any spiritual benefit from such a deception, because plainly the angels will be aware of it.
You will most likely then commit some other obvious sin, because we all stand not only by our own righteousness, but by virtue of a lot of help from the holy spirit, which if withdrawn results in a very quick descent into sin. The elders who judge, are to believe your representations unless they have evidence to disprove them. Obviously one cannot say I thought murder or theft or kidnapping was fine! But the first time you are accused of or admit to breaking a law, if you truly did not understand that law, you will suffer no penalty from the congregation.
It is not right to punish someone who did not know that they had sinned. However, ignorance of the law only works once!
14
I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is defiled in itself; only where a man considers something to be
defiled, to him it is defiled (Romans 14).
The priestly tree required continual eating in the garden.
The kingly tree required continual abstention from eating.
This is in fact how God's people will eventually be judged, one should only be disfellowshipped for performing a work of the flesh, one should not be disfellowshipped for not praying enough or not doing enough field service or not showing enough love etc. But to keep from doing fleshly works one has to keep eating from the tree of life, which is absorbing food from our high priest, Jesus Christ, through the bible.
The sins which carry immediate disfellowshipping are sins incurring death (under law). These sins against God are:
All of the above carried the death penalty under the law of Moses or are condemned in the new testament - the guy who picked up sticks on the Sabbath was unrepentant we suppose. Under the law, fornication did not mean death, it meant you had to marry the girl if she was free (not owned by a master or a husband) and if the father consented. Unintentional manslayers did not of necessity die. The high priest, Jesus, of the city of refuge for all of the sons of Adam, which is the planet earth under Satan's system, has died, so the unintentional manslayer is released.
Men causing divisions by attempting to stumble weak ones against accepted teachings, but who stop short of actually promoting a sect, are to be avoided (Romans 16:17), but they do not get an automatic admonition as in the case of those who actually start promoting a sect. If they are to be avoided then it is implied that they are still around in the congregation. We must define what it is to promote a sect.
Firstly let us state clearly the minimum set of beliefs that you must hold in order to be baptised into the church and that you must continue to hold in order that you continue in the church. We deduce these from Peter's speech to the 3,000 baptised in Acts 2...
[1] Jesus, the Nazarene was sent by God and performed the works portents and signs catalogued in the 4 canonical gospels.
[2] He was killed on a stake and was resurrected by God
[3] The old testament prophets bear witness to a messiah appointed to the Jews who was Jesus Christ.
[4] The resurrected Christ is the heavenly head of the Christian church.
[5] You must repent of your past sins prior to baptism, and you must continue to repent of your sins after baptism. At baptism this is a private matter, after baptism you should openly confess your sins to your brother, but neither of these are policed by humans.
[6] You must confess that Jesus came in the flesh in the first century both as a human and then afterwards through his wife the first new covenant saints, after he made that covenant. You must also confess that Jesus will come again in the flesh to collect the church at the end.
(We presently believe that he comes in the flesh of his wife in the form of the descended first new covenant saints, this being his manifestation at the end of the second presence. If not then you are an antichrist, which is a bad idea - accepting this particular interpretationis not necessary)
If you cease to believe any of the things above you should see the elders and if this matter cannot be resolved you should resign from the church. If you publicly espouse a position against any of these beliefs you are de facto acting as an apostate and will get a warning for apostasy.
Secondly, let us consider all beliefs over and above our basic minimum set...
1. If you put forward that your view is the view of the governing body when you know it is not, this is dishonestly promoting a sect.
2. If you tell your friends, that you normally discuss things with that you think that the governing body is wrong and that you are right, this is not promoting a sect, it is just expressing your opinion. Even if your publish your new understanding to a wider group than your fellow researchers and friends out of enthusiasm or in an attempt to gauge feedback or provke further research, this again is not apostasy. But if you continue to publicly espouse a new understanding whilst refusing to submit that understanding to the church in some way then you may be acting as an apostate if the understanding is dangerous to the congregation. Likewise if having submitted a new understanding to the church, you continue to push it widely then if that idea is dangerous to the health of the congregation you may again be acting as an apostate.
We cannot come up with any hard and fast rules about this here as yet. It is a matter for the elders. The spiritual man examines all things, and we have absolutely no desire to discourage bible debate or limit free bible research speech as it were. We will leave it to the elders to determine whether the activities are simply bible research discussions or the divisive promotion of a sect. The elders need to learn to balance spiritual free speech and freedom to espouse any interpretation at all in research with discouraging people pushing unaccepted ideas which are dangerous to the health of the congregation. Here are the 3 criteria for elders to consider...
[1] Has the idea been submitted to the church
[2] Is the idea just a technical point or is it fundamentally dnagerous to the health of the congregation. One cannot be an apostate for proposing that Noah was possessed by Adam, for such a belief does not pose a threat to the health of the church. One can be an apostate for proposing that the second new covenant has not yet begun.
[3] Is the brother or sister just being enthusiastic and stimulating other brothers with his new idea, which is laudable and to be encouraged. Or are they truly trying to form a fan club which later they may take with them somehwere else.
Having considered these 3 points. If the elders wish to curtail his activities, then they should inform him of their decision and only if he then continues in opposition to that decision should he get his first warning for apostasy.
31 For you can all prophesy one by one, that all may learn and all
be encouraged.
32 And [gifts of] the spirit of the prophets are to be controlled
by the prophets.
33 For God is [a God], not of disorder, but of peace. As in all the congregations of the holy
ones (1 Corinthians 14).
17 Now I exhort you, brothers, to keep your eye on those who cause
divisions and occasions for stumbling contrary to the teaching that you have learned, and avoid
them.
18 For men of that sort are slaves, not of our Lord Christ, but of
their own bellies; and by smooth talk and complimentary speech they seduce the hearts of guileless ones.
19 For your obedience has come to the notice of all. I therefore
rejoice over you. But I want you to be wise as to what is good, but innocent as to what is
evil (Romans 16).
So for example if you were to tell a lot of people in the congregation that in your opinion the second horseman of the apocalypse is Homer Simpson, well, this is not likely to cause divisions or stumble the guileless ones. It is just another scriptural viewpoint. But if you tell a lot of people in the congregation that the bible code is no use, or that no one can ever see anything in advance from it, or indeed anything obviously designed to demotivate God's people or destroy their faith in the bible, the bible code, Jesus or God, then the elders must act and warn you either officially or unofficially depending on the history and gravity of the situation. If you or your research group have a interesting new idea or see a scriptural mistake on this site, please inform the congregation research overseer or email us or write to us. That is how to present your grain offering to the priesthood. The priest then has the job of seasoning it with salt, before offering it up to God and his people.
Food must be proof read by exprienced priests before it is presented. You cannot season your own sacrifice with salt.
Thirdly we consider actions...
If you advise two or more brothers to act on your view of how to worhsip God rather than on the governing body's view, then you are promoting a sect. The sect of those who worship on your direction rather than that of the governing body. However if you disagree with the governing body and are convinced that you are correct, then you should follow your conscience first and the priesthood second. If this means your leaving the church but holding a good conscience, then so be it. Your conscience is above the priesthood for you. But of course if you are a saint, you will lose your place in teh first coem first serve angelic baptism queue, and possibly lose your sanctification. We would strongly recommend that anyone consider this carefully discuss the matter with overseers and brothers first.
We would like you to be awake, and responsive first to your conscience and second to the governing body. But do not lead others into opposition, advise them to follow their own conscience. Your duty is to follow your own conscience and inform the governing body of your view. It is not to inform lots of people other than the governing body of your view. Your duty stops there, unless you believe that the governing body has been rejected by God, disfellowshipped by Jesus, and is therefore no longer the governing body. Gordon followed a fallen governing body for too long in his opinion, but for a length of time recorded to the scriptures in Revelation 11! You should not go from congregation to congregation spreading your view on how to worship God, even if you represent that it’s only your view, this sort of dissemination is the job of the governing body. But if you are asked for your view by anybody you are free to give it.
There should be a research overseer in each congregation. He should have superiors all the way up to the governing body. Let us also say this. There is no scriptural basis for banning any books or websites or films of any type. We are not in the garden of Eden any more. We are surrounded by thorns and thistles. Read whatever you like, speak to whomsoever you choose. How can the true religion be less free than the founding fathers envisioned for the US in the Bill of Rights? Any religion which bans books or websites or films, is actually a sect itself. For a sect is a group of people who restrict external influence on themselves. Such things are the tactics of Satan and the Gestapo and McCarthy and the Catholic inquisition, the tactics of the sons of the darkness. They are not the tactics of God or his sons of the light.

It is obvious that a promoter of a sect is extreme leaven, therefore any other sort of leaven will be treated no more harshly than him, i.e. get two admonitions first, the yellow and the orange card! The third fleshly act, sin, results in disfellowshipping.
As for a man that promotes a sect, reject him after a first and a second admonition (Titus 3:10).
This is the third time I am coming to you. At the mouth of two witnesses or
of three every matter must be established.
I have said previously and, as if present the second time and yet absent now,
I say in advance to those who have sinned before and to all the rest, that if
ever I come again I will not spare (2 Corinthians 13:1,2).
For instance one who turns up drunk at meetings regularly, or the one who strips naked in the congregation, or one who fornicates with the elder's daughter is to be treated no more harshly than the raving apostate. The above must carry a charge because they are definitely leaven. As regards all the other sins, not mentioned above in [J3] & [J4], they can be forgiven by the one sinned against or by the elders so long as they do not constitute leaven, i.e. a danger to the congregation, established uncleanness.
Every warning, every accusation, only lasts until the Jubilee. Jubilees are every 50 months, we are under a monthly sabbath law. The law started in 1999Shebat when the LWs first started feeding through the web. The first Sabbath month was 2000Ab, which we missed along with several others. The first jubilee month was 2003Adar, which we did not miss. The last Sabbath is 2008Nisan when this system ends and the last Jubilee is 2008Iyyar when Jesus appears..
Since an overseer should not be a drunken brawler, it is apparent that there were such in the congregation, which means that they were either on an admonition/accusation or had been forgiven, or were known as such but had not been accused.
1 Timothy 3, 1 Timothy 5, Titus 1 all show that men in the congregation can be under an accusation, or under a charge of something which is an accusation. The context seems to indicate that this is a proven accusation.
Do not admit an accusation against an older man except only on the evidence of two or three witnesses. Reprove before all onlookers persons who practice sin, that the rest also may have fear (1 Timothy 5:19,20).
For this reason I left you in Crete, that you might correct the things that were defective and might make appointments of older men in city after city, as I gave you orders. If there is any man free from accusation, a husband of one wife, having believing children that were not under a charge of debauchery nor unruly. For an overseer must be free from accusation (Titus 1:5-7).
So children were members of the congregation. And there were men in the congregation who had more than one wife. So having two wives would not stop a man getting baptised (but it would stop him doing much else one would imagine!)
Certainly elders must be publicly reproved, obviously they are not disfellowshipped in the case of 1 Timothy 5:19, because this would be a public reproof. Also presumably ordinary members of the congregation would publicly reproved if they came under accusation, to warn the congregation of the danger they posed. In any event brothers should openly confess their sin!
Therefore openly confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may get healed. A righteous man's supplication, when it is at work, has much force (James 5:16).
Sins which definitely carry an admonition:
| True Fornication in circumstances defined in J10 | 1 Timothy 1:8-11 Revelation 21:8 |
| Promoter of a sect as defined in J4 | Romans 13:13 Galatians 5:21 |
| Thief who does not compensate | Matthew 15:19 Mark 7:21 1 Corinthians 6:9 |
The thief in the congregation should make compensation to the victim, whether in the congregation or not, according to the law of Moses (which is twice as much as he stole if he still has the item, and 4 times as much if it was a small item which he sold on, and 5 times as much if it was a large item which he sold on - the elders can decide whether in their opinion it was small or large). If he does this then there is no penalty from the congregation. He has literally paid for his sin. If he does not then he gets an admonition.
Failing to provide for your own family in circmstances where you have the (legal and financial and logistical) means so to do brings an accusation...
8 Certainly if anyone does not provide for those who are his own, and especially for those who are members of his household, he has disowned the faith and is worse than a person without faith (1 Timothy 5).
All the following sins:
| Brawlers and smiters | |
| Drug addiction | |
| Drunkards | |
| False swearers of Oaths | 1 Timothy 1:8-11 |
May or may not lead to an admonition depending on whether the elders judge that they are leaven, definite uncleanness, to the congregation. The unintentional manslayer is forgiven. Fornication is a sin against God's law on marriage but it is not a sin against God. Adultery is a sin against God because one is putting asunder what God has yoked together (assuming that the marriage was not a contrivance or the result of blackmail or undue influence etc.) Paul shows that adultery carries immediate disfellowshipping (1 Corinthians 5). False testifying carries the penalty for testifier that would have been laid upon the man falsely accused, had the accusation been made to stick. This can of course be disfellowshipping. If only the laws of this system worked like this! People would think twice before making up stories.
If a man carries a charge and commits a further sin of any type for which he is further charged during the life of the first charge then he carries two charges until the next jubilee, and if he commits a further sin for which he should be charged in this period, then he has 3 witnesses against him that he is unclean and he is thrown out for 7 months.
Obviously an elder has to step down if a charge is proved against him, this is one import of 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1. Also Peter denied Jesus three times which would have meant disfellowshipping one supposes, had Jesus not made supplication on his behalf to the God of undeserved kindness.
So if someone commits a sin which does not incur death (under the law of Moses) and he does this twice, thus denying Jesus twice, seeing as he is baptised into his name, then we cannot chuck him out, because Peter did this three times. However if he does it three times, then he is chucked out and he, like Peter, will have to rely on Jesus' supplications, and if he says that he is repentant then he will be accepted back after 7 months, in the absence of evidence that he is unrepentant. And Jesus himself said to Peter do you love me three times, but Peter only got very upset at the third instance. So if Jesus has to ask this question of any member of his congregation three times, then that man will get very upset because he will be disfellowshipped. That is the sort of death with which he will glorify God, being taken somewhere that he doesn't want to go, namely the world. But hopefully he will repent after 7 months. Furthermore if Jesus is to be able to ask this question three times, then the sinner must be allowed two warnings, in order that he is still in the congregation when the third question is asked.
Suicide is self murder. It is self disfellowshipping. If you defile your physical temple, your body, with drug addiction you are an idolater. If you destroy your body you have plainly committed a life abusing sin. You have stolen something that belongs to God.
4 Look! All the souls to me they belong. As the soul of the father so likewise the soul of the son to me they belong. The soul that is sinning, it itself will die (Ezekiel 18).
So legally anyone who committed suicide should be disfellowshipped. But of course he has actually disfellowshipped himself. So an attempted suicide as an attempt at a life abusing sin. So it is a fleshly act which requires an official warning. However people who attempt suicide need as lot of help and will not benefit from being thrown out of the church. So whilst they may have given up on their soul the church will not give up on them. We will not disfellowship anyone for any number of attempted suicide bids. They will be constructively fixed with diminished responsibility for this sin. Make no mistake, if you succeed in killing yourself you lose your water baptism.
2 The overseer should therefore be
irreprehensible, a husband of one wife, moderate in habits, sound in mind,
orderly,
hospitable, qualified to teach,
3 not a drunken brawler, not a smiter, but
reasonable, not belligerent, not a lover of money,
4 a man presiding over his own household in a fine
manner, having children in subjection with all seriousness;
5 (if indeed any man does not know how to preside over his own
household, how will he take care of God's congregation?)
6 not a newly converted man, for fear that he might get puffed up
[with pride] and fall into the judgment passed upon the Devil.
7 Moreover, he should also have a fine testimony from people on
the outside, in order that he might not fall into reproach and a snare of the
Devil (1 Timothy 3:2-7).
8 Ministerial servants should likewise be serious, not
double-tongued, not giving themselves to a lot of wine, not greedy of dishonest
gain,
9 holding the sacred secret of the faith with a clean
conscience.
10 Also, let these be tested as to fitness first, then let them
serve as ministers, as they are free from accusation.
11 Women should likewise be serious, not
slanderous, moderate in habits, faithful in all things.
12 Let ministerial servants be husbands of one
wife, presiding in a fine manner over children and their own households (1
Timothy 3:8-12).
5 For this reason I left you in Crete, that you might correct the
things that were defective and might make appointments of older men in city after city, as I gave you
orders;
6 if there is any man free from accusation, a husband of one
wife, having believing children that were not under a charge of debauchery nor
unruly.
7 For an overseer must be free from accusation as God's
steward, not self-willed, not prone to wrath, not a drunken brawler, not a
smiter, not greedy of dishonest
gain,
8 but hospitable, a lover of goodness, sound in
mind, righteous, loyal, self-controlled,
9 holding firmly to the faithful word as respects his [art of]
teaching, that he may be able both to exhort by the teaching that is healthful and to
reprove those who contradict (Titus 1:5-9).
Obscene talk
Multiplying wives (where it is legal in the country concerned)
Fits of Rage
Revilers
General dishonesty
Causing divisions and stumbling others
Covetousness (desiring something that belongs to another).
One should not drink an animal’s blood and one should not take a blood transfusion, the Watchtower Society have realised this correctly, from Acts 15:
Abstain from things polluted by idols and from fornication and from what is strangled and from blood (Acts 15:20).
To keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication (Acts 15:29).
However they apply the law too harshly and too naively (as did we up to November 9th 2004). Firstly one cannot sin by having a transfusion of one’s own blood, because this is what happens during a nose bleed. So if a brother went up to a high altitude and developed a nose bleed, and the blood ran down the back of his throat, then if this was truly an abuse of blood, he would have to be disfellowshipped, for drinking his own blood.
As for any man of the sons of Israel, or some alien resident, who is residing as an alien in your midst, who in hunting catches a wild beast or a fowl that may be eaten, he must in that case pour its blood out and cover it with dust. For the soul of every sort of flesh is its blood by the soul in it. Consequently I said to the sons of Israel: You must not eat the blood of any sort of flesh, because the soul of every sort of flesh is its blood. Anyone eating it will be cut off (Leviticus 17:13).
The unclean one and the clean one may eat it, like the gazelle and like the stag. Only the blood you must not eat. On the earth you should pour it out as water (Deuteronomy 12:15,16).
These two scriptures say that in the event that you wish to kill an animal to eat it, then you must pour out its blood, and in the event that you pour out its blood, you must pour it out on the earth, and cover it with dust.
The Watchtower Society had deduced at one time from this (it may have changed its position today) that in the event that one takes blood out of a man, one should then pour it out on the earth and not put it back into the same man, in the form of a blood transfusion, at a later time. But these scriptures would only apply if one was going to eat the flesh of that man. They would only apply to cannibals! Since Christians are not cannibals, they do not apply.
So one can certainly store and transfuse one’s own blood. The home of one’s blood is quite obviously in one’s body, it is not unnatural to put it back there after it has been removed.
Secondly God’s laws only apply to members of the congregation. Children under the age of 20 cannot be sanctified into the 3AC to be tested as regards their fitness as kings, or water baptised into the 2AC to be tested as regards their fitness as priests. One could not be registered into the army of Israel until one was 20 years old:
Take the sum of the whole assembly of the sons of Israel from twenty years of age and upward, according to the house of their fathers, all those going out to the army in Israel (Numbers 26:2).
But they can be admitted into the congregation through the bath of the flesh, through the laying on of hands and prayer in the case of FDS4:
Then young children were brought to him, for him to put his hands upon them and offer prayer; but the disciples reprimanded them.
Jesus, however, said: Let the young children alone, and stop hindering them from coming to me, for the kingdom of the heavens belongs to suchlike ones.
And he put his hands upon them and went from there (Matthew 19:13-15).
Such Children are in fact baptised into the 1AC, not the 2AC or 3AC. We originally thought that this meant that they were not under congregation law. But plainly every city has one wall, and every church has one law for all. The lower age limit for water baptism is set by the bible at 5 years old see [J8]. So little children who are baptised into the 1AC are under congregation law, but we must apply it bearing their diminished responsibility in mind.
But there may be another option now, namely that if there is time, their blood can be stored before the operation and transfused back after it. Furthermore, it is not inconceivable that a blood bank could be established for the Lord’s witnesses, where all witnesses blood is stored and frozen, in case of an emergency. This would solve the problem to some extent, with good communication and fast motorbikes! Some of the very orthodox Jews do this we think. This might be a worthwhile project? There is also the possibility of synthetic red cells, which are permissable, since they are not 'alive'.
The best example from God of why we should not take a blood transfusion even from our own relatives is the placenta in the mother. This organ exists in order that the nutrients may be extracted from the mother by osmosis, whilst the mother's blood is kept entirely separate from the blood of the foetus. The placenta protects the baby from the mother's blood, and prohibits a transfusion. Body part transplants are quite obviously the same as fornication being an illegal joining of two fleshes who are not married, unless the organ is from your spouse - see [J9]. But a blood transfusion is a joining not of two fleshes but of two bloods, which contain living cells, and is therefore a form of fornication. It is also an abuse of life since to God, and to us:
For the soul of every sort of flesh is its blood by the soul in it. Consequently I said to the sons of Israel: You must not eat the blood of any sort of flesh, because the soul of every sort of flesh is its blood (Leviticus 17:14).
So if joining flesh is fornication then joining blood is adultery.
Synthetic blood is used by the US military in emergency situations. This is acceptable as the blood is not living in any way. It is a dead chemical compound. Furthermore Red Blood Cells themselves are basically dead. They are e-nucleated during before they are released into the blood stream and have no mitocondria so they have no synthesising capability. They become a bag of haemoglobin. So a red cell only transfusion would also be permissable. For more on this see below.
Recent developments in the UK have lead to a situation where the government is reported to be contemplating banning anyone who has ever had a blood transfusion from giving blood! It is possible that the risk of catching BSE from a blood transfusion has been very much underestimated, the reports say. This is obviously an admission that a blood transfusion is not a great idea. The inference is that those who have received a transfusion are damaged goods.
But recently there have been great strides in artificial hemoglobin products and synthetic oxygen transport products, such as polyfluorocarbons (PFCs). Here is a list of some commercial artificial blood products:
| Product | Website | Description | Availability |
| Hemopure | Biopure, www.biopure.com |
Bovine Hemoglobin glutamer | Clinical trials |
| Hemolink | Hemosol, www.hemosol.com/index.cfm | Hemoglobin raffimer | UK approval late 2002/early2003 |
| Oxygent | www.allp.com/oxygent | Perfluorocarbon | Phase 3 clinical trials completed in Europe |
| Oxycyte | www.sybd.com/SB.html | Perfluorocarbon | unknown |
Here is the commercial sell for PFC as opposed to blood transfusions:
| Blood Transfusion | PFC |
| Blood Typing required | Universally Compatible |
| Bacterial contamination | Heat Sterilised |
| Immune Suppression | Normal Immune Function |
| Viral disease transmission (AIDS Hepatitus C, BSE etc.) | Synthetic ingredients |
| Delayed Oxygen Delivery | Immediate Oxygen Delivery |
| Shortages | Cost effective manufacturing |
PFCs have the capability to be as good as or better than red cells at oxygen transport to cells. Oxycyte claims to do a 70 times better job than God in this regard and why not? This technology is represented to be only a few months away from FDA approval. Oxycyte has just finished Phase 1 clinical trials - see www.bioexchange.com. Some of the progress made in this new field must be due to the position of the JWs. So here, for a change, the LWs salute the JWs for their uncompromising stance on blood in general (although the details were wrong, the idea was right). As of March 25th 2004, MP4, a new synthetic red cell substitute has passed its phase II clinical trials. So artificial blood is nearly here!
Well, here is a section that Gordon never thought he would be writing! The LWs changed their stance on blood transfusions on November 9th 2004 (early morning) 2004Heshvan22, as a result of the work of Jeff Goldsmith, a son of Levi. He spent two months considering this issue and at the same time Barb in the US was considering it. They both focused on 1Samuel14. Geoff convinced Gordon and we finally understand the following:
When someone attacks you, trying to kill you, they lose their right to their life, their blood. You gain the right to use their life, their blood, only to save your own. You can choose to kill them and spill their blood in self defence with impunity. If your life is in danger then you can make any use of their blood, their life, that in your judgment protects or saves your life, your blood. So you can make any life protecting use of an attacker's blood without his consent, since his attack on your life, your blood, is an implied consent. The legal effect of the attack is merely to grant a consent to the victim to use the attacker's blood in a life protecting way. Therefore you can make any life protecting use of a non attacker's blood with his consent. Therefore you can take a blood transfusion from a consenting person in order to protect your life.
Putting this in a more simple way. God's law on blood exists to protect the sanctity of physical life which is represented by the blood and is owned by God. Therefore a use of blood which saves a life, does not break the law which forbid's abuse of blood. It is actually the purpose of blood to protect life!!!
This is not true of God's law on idolatry. If a false worshipper tells you he will shoot you unless you do an act of false worship, the thing to do is to refuse, and if necessary, kill him, run or get shot.
Here is the relevant part of 1Samuel14:
23 And Jehovah
proceeded on that day to save Israel, and the battle itself passed over to Beth-aven.
24 And the men of
Israel themselves were hard pressed on that day, and yet Saul put the people
under the pledge of an oath, saying: Cursed is the man that eats bread before
the evening and until I have taken vengeance upon my enemies! And none of the
people tasted bread.
25 And all those
of the land came into the woods, when honey happened to be over all the surface
of the field.
26 When the
people came into the woods, why, look! there was a dripping of honey, but there
was no one putting his hand to his mouth, because the people were afraid of the
oath.
27 As for
Jonathan, he had not been listening when his father put the people under an
oath, so he stretched out the tip of the rod that was in his hand and dipped it
into the honeycomb and drew his hand back to his mouth, and his eyes began to
beam.
28 At this one of
the people answered and said: Your father solemnly put the people under oath,
saying, 'Cursed is the man that eats bread today!' And the people began to get
tired.
29 However,
Jonathan said: My father has brought ostracism upon the land. See,
please, how my eyes have beamed because I tasted this little bit of honey.
30 How much more
so if the people had but eaten today from the spoil of their enemies that they
found! For now the slaughter upon the Philistines has not been great.
31 And on that
day they kept striking down the Philistines from Michmash to Aijalon, and the
people got to be very tired.
32 And the people
began darting greedily at the spoil and taking sheep and cattle and calves and
slaughtering them on the earth, and the people fell to eating along with the
blood [they did not bleed them before they
cooked them].
33 So they told
Saul, saying: Look! The people are sinning against Jehovah by eating along with
the blood. At this he said: You have dealt treacherously. First of all, roll a
great stone to me.
34 After that
Saul said: Scatter among the people, and you must say to them, 'Bring near to
me, each one of you, his bull and, each one, his sheep, and you must do the
slaughtering in this place and the eating, and you must not sin against Jehovah
by eating along with the blood.' Accordingly all the people brought near each
one his bull that was in his hand that night and did the slaughtering there.
35 And Saul
proceeded to build an altar to Jehovah. With it he started altar building to
Jehovah.
36 Later Saul
said: Let us go down after the Philistines by night and plunder them until the
morning lightens up, and let us not leave a single one among them. To this they
said: Anything that is good in your eyes do. Then the priest said: Let us
approach here to the [true] God.
37 And Saul began
to inquire of God: Shall I go down after the Philistines? Will you give them
into the hand of Israel? And he did not answer him on that day.
38 So Saul said:
Come near here, all you keymen of the people, and ascertain and see in what way
this sin has come to be today.
39 For as
Jehovah, who is the Deliverer of Israel, is alive, even if it is in Jonathan my
son, yet he will positively die. But there was no one answering him out of all
the people.
40 And he went on
to say to all Israel: You yourselves will come to be on the one side, and I and
Jonathan my son -- we will come to be on the other side. At this the people said
to Saul: What is good in your eyes do.
41 And Saul
proceeded to say to Jehovah: Oh God of Israel, do give Thummim! Then Jonathan
and Saul were taken, and the people themselves went out.
42 Saul now said:
Cast lots to decide between me and Jonathan my son. And Jonathan got to be
taken.
43 Then Saul said
to Jonathan: Do tell me, What have you done? So Jonathan told him and said: I
did for a fact taste a little honey on the tip of the rod that is in my hand.
Here I am! Let me die!
45 At this Saul
said: Thus may God do and thus may he add to it, if you do not positively die,
Jonathan.
45 But the people
said to Saul: Is Jonathan to die, who has performed this great salvation in
Israel? It is unthinkable! As Jehovah is alive, not as much as a single hair of
his head will fall to the earth; for it was with God that he worked this day.
With that the people redeemed Jonathan, and he did not die
46 So Saul
withdrew from following the Philistines, and the Philistines themselves went to
their place (1 Samuel 14).
This is a very interesting and technical account. Jonathon instigates an attack on the Philistines. Saul makes the people swear an unnecessary oath that limits their ability to do God's work. Jonathon inadvertently breaks this oath being unaware that it existed and God blesses him and the attack nonetheless. Saul then attempts to instigate a further attack on the Philistines on the next Hebrew day, but God does not indicate that he will bless Saul's attack. It must have occurred to Saul that he might be at fault, because he asks for Thummim to decide whose fault it is that God refuses to bless the second attack. The Thummim decides that the fault lies with either Jonathon or Saul. Thummim should be used by the priest not by the king, although Saul may have asked the priest to use it. So the result here is suspect.
So the lot came for Jonathon and Saul instantly and immediately condemned his own son to death, a son whose battle against the Philistines had been blessed by God all day long. But in truth it was Saul who was to blame by putting his men in an impossible position with an oath that was tantamount to killing them. He took Israel into the oath in order to appear to be as courageous as his son Jonathon, with whom he was competing. He was actually jealous of his own son, and he risked the lives of the whole army in order to enhance his popularity (he could have run for office today on that ticket and won). Now God did not kill those of the sons of Israel who had eaten blood along with their meat. He could have instructed Saul to attack the Philistines and arranged for everyone who had eaten blood to be killed for example. He could have instructed Samuel to speak to Saul and tell him to kill everyone who had eaten blood. He could have sent an angel and struck them all down as he did in the case of 70,000 of those who agreed to be registered by Joab. But God did not punish any of his people, he merely embarrassed Saul by failing to bless him as he had blessed his son. This was in fact the perfect punishment for a King who had sought to increase his popularity by risking the lives of his soldiers. God's response was to save the lives of his soldiers and decrease the popularity of the King!
Now clearly God did not make a mistake or forget about the men who had eaten the blood! So there must have been extenuating circumstances for the sons of Israel who abused
blood. Well if you are prosecuting a war which requires you to chase after
people and hack them to pieces with swords, then being tired and hungry and
therefore weak, is a life threatening problem. So the extenuating circumstances
were that the soldiers were in mortal danger. If the Philistines had launched a
counter attack on tired hungry and weak Jews, the result could have been fatal.
So obviously there are circumstances wherein abusing blood carries no penalty.
We deduce from this account that such circumstances are when the abuse of blood
is for the purpose of saving or protecting life. Here is some more simple blood logic...
10 As
for any man of the house of Israel or some alien resident who is residing as an
alien in your midst who eats any sort of blood, I shall certainly set my face
against the soul that is eating the blood, and I shall indeed cut him off from
among his people.
11
For the soul of the flesh is in the blood, and I myself have put it upon the
altar for you to make atonement for your souls,
because it is the blood that makes atonement by the soul [in it].
12
That is why I have said to the sons of Israel: No soul of you must eat blood and
no alien resident who is residing as an alien in your midst should eat blood
(Leviticus 17).
So the only permissible use of blood under law was
sacrificial in order to redeem your soul. The purpose of a sacrifice being to
save life. So God only permits blood to be used sacrificially in order save
life. So if someone sacrifices his own blood in order to save another persons
life, through a blood transfusion, then that is precisely the permitted use of
blood by God. In fact the one who sacrifices his blood in order to save
another's life is doing what Jesus did with his blood, is he not? And the one who
sacrifices his kidney in order to save his brother's life is likewise doing what
Jesus did with his body, surely? For we both eat his body and drink his blood.
If we are Christians, should we not then sacrifice
both our body parts and our blood in order to save our brother's lives, like our
examplar Jesus Christ did, in order to save all of our lives?
Or shall we stand here, saved by the sacrificial use of
Jesus' body and blood, claiming to be following in his footsteps, but forbidding
the sacrificial use of our own body or our own blood to save anyone else – doh!
So dear brothers and sisters in the patriarchs of Israel and in the
cherubs and Seraph of God, we have become like our archetypes the Pharisees whom
we deride. We have gulped down the details of the law of Moses and strained out
its lesson and its fulfilment, which is the absolute necessity of the
sacrifice of one man’s body and blood for another. For it was a tutor
leading to the sacrifice of the Christ. And we as Christians should likewise
stand ready to sacrifice ourselves or parts thereof for our brothers. Jesus
said:

Physiologically, assuming the blood you receive contains living blood cells (non red cells) from another person, then your blood is polluted and becomes unclean. What this means is that any baptism which you possess, since it was effected by a washing in the blood of a mediator, is broken, because the blood you receive will not be so washed. Now there is an interesting question here. Since you cannot be spirit baptised twice, is a born again brother or sister consigned to Gehenna by virtue of this transfusion?
The answer is no because the baptism symbolically washes not just your blood but effectively your blood production organs, such as your spleen and your bone marrow. If it only symbolically washed your blood cells, then since they all perish after a few months, your baptism would ' run out'! So after a few months (and certainly less that 7 months) the foreign blood cells will have all died and your spirit baptism will be returned to you.
If you receive a blood transfusion unknowingly or against your will, then you are in the position of a woman who has been raped. So long as you 'screamed' (if that was possible - Deuteronomy 22) you can be returned to the congregation immediately.
23 In case there happened to be a virgin girl engaged to a
man, and a man actually found her in the city and lay down with her,
24 You must also bring them both out to the gate of that city and
pelt them with stones, and they must die, the girl for the reason that she did not scream in the city, and the man for the reason that
he humiliated the wife of his fellowman. So you must clear away what is evil from your
midst.
25 If, however, it is in the field that the man found the girl who
was engaged, and the man grabbed hold of her and lay down with her, the man who lay down with her must also die by himself,
26 and to the girl you must do nothing. The girl has no sin
deserving of death, because just as when a man rises up against his fellowman and indeed murders
him, even a soul, so it is with this case (Deuteronomy 22:23-26).
[1] Any baptised LW who willingly takes a blood transfusion of blood other than his/her own is disfellowshipped for 7 months unless the blood transfusion was necessary to save his/her life or to prevent a life threatening situation.
[2] Any baptised LW who willingly donates blood without a guarantee from the person to whom he gives it that the blood will only be used to save a life or to prevent a life threatening situation is disfellowshipped for 7 months.
[3] God's law as we understand does permit blood transfusions only in life threatening situations. If you take a transfusion in these circumstances we recommend that you ask for blood filtered with a 4th generation log6 filter to limit your exposure to the immune system of the donor.
[4] If you choose not to have a blood transfusion in a life threatening circumstance, this is not an attempted suicide, everyone has the right to refuse any form of medical treatment.
Artificial blood is OK, your own blood is OK, and white cell free blood (not white cell reduced blood) is OK. But at this point the technology for white cell free blood, which is the holy grail of blood transfusion medicine, is not yet available. As we understand it.
So the LW Blood Transfusion Card will read something like this...
I only authorise a blood transfusion as a last resort in a life threatening situation. I will only accept leucodepleted blood.
Signed...........................................
18 And where a man lies down with a menstruating woman and does lay bare her nakedness, he has exposed her source, and she herself has laid bare the source of her blood. So both of them must be cut off from among their people (Levictus 20).
We take this to mean that one should not have unprotected penetrative sex with a menstruating woman. If such a thing deliberately occurs when the woman is definitvely mesntruating then according to the law, both parties should be thrown out. This is because the act is an abuse of blood. The blood of the woman can easily enter the thin skin of the moving member of the man. Protected sex would be OK in this situation. We are not going to police this and there will never or very rarely be 2 or 3 witnesses to such an act. So use your conscience and common sense here brothers and sisters please! We are not going to be the menstral investigation society.
The JWs as of November 2004 still ban major blood components, which they deem to be red cells, white cells, plasma and platelets, but permit fractions of those components. In particular they used to ban factor 8 for hemophiliacs (but no longer do as it is a fraction of a component). Now it is obvious that all blood components cannot be banned because water is a component of blood. So which components of blood are the sacred part? Well the answer is found in Leviticus 17:14 above or in Genesis:
Only flesh with its soul - its blood - you must not eat (Genesis 9:4).
Blood represents or is the soul, the life of the flesh. It feeds the flesh. So it is the components of blood which represent life which must be avoided. These are the living components of blood quite obviously, the blood cells. So blood cells should be avoided, if they are alive. By this we mean, platelets, leucocytes (white blood cells) etc. but not erythrocytes (red blood cells), because erythrocytes are dead by the following scriptural yardstick:
The word of God is alive and exerts power (Hebrews 4:12).
The Word of God is alive in the sense that is has different meanings at different times, in other words it is not static in meaning. It has the ability to change its character. Something which is alive is not passive, it is active with the ability to change itself. Red cells, having no nucleus, cannot change their constitution, so they are dead, in the sense of Hebrews 4:12. Blood plasma which is devoid of all living cells can be transfused without violating God's laws, because it is none of it alive.
So returning to the Haemophiliac, we see that factor 8, being a dead chemical compound, can be transfused, ingested or taken intravenously without sin. At this point there may be some readers who burst into tears, and quite rightly so. For there are a number of Jehovah's witnesses who were haemophiliacs, who may have been known to the reader, and who have died unnecessarily as a result of the false and ignorant teachings of the Society on blood we believe. In fact there may even have been some bible students who have died before they were baptised because of their faith and because of the negligence of the Governing body in this respect. Fortunately we have a God who appreciates what these faithful people have done, and if he resurrects anyone, he will resurrect them. But he may well ask back their blood from the governing body of the Witnesses. For these leaders are bloodguilty men in this respect not by intent, but by negligence. It does not take a genius to work out that it is the living components of blood that Acts 15, Leviticus 17 and Genesis 9 refer to.
In this regard Gordon must say the following: "You know my bible research reminds me of a situation that I often see at work. In my office we have a team of people who have the job of compiling the statistics on how well the business is doing. One of my businesses makes around £15,000 per week ($23,000). On one particular week I was handed figures showing that my business had made £150,000 ($230,000) !!! For the previous 50 weeks it had always made between £10,000 ($16,000) and £20,000 ($32,000). The whole statistics department just handed me these figures without comment. They didn't even realise that the figures were ludicrous. They didn't even think that if we really had made ten times more money that week than we had in every other preceding week then we would all have been doing ten times more work that week than usual which would have been totally impossible. What this whole department did was write down figures without thinking about them, without understanding them and without caring about what they could possibly mean. It was a vacuous exercise that they were performing. At that moment I knew exactly how God feels about his people who read his book.
They nearly all read it without understanding a word, because they are not prepared to think about what it might mean, just like my statistics department. It is truly maddening! Dear reader: Do not be like my statistics department used to be, please! It's like God told Isaiah to say to his true people, to the true people of God mind you:
Hear again and again, Oh men, but do not understand. And see again and again but do not get any knowledge (Isaiah 6:9)."
So it is ok to take factor 8. It is ok to take blood plasma, so long as it has no living cells in it. And it is OK to take any blood component at all if it is necessary to save your life or to avoid a life threatening situation.
The reason that blood transfusions save lives, is that the life is in the blood, in the sense that the red cells carry the oxygen needed for the brain and the rest of the flesh. A common usage of a blood transfusion which can save life is after a car crash where the patient has lost a lot of blood and is still bleeding. Now the advantage of a blood transfusion is that the new red cells keep feeding the patients brain with oxygen and therefore keep him alive until the bleeding can be stopped. The patient is just like a carton of orange with a hole in it. If you cannot plug the hole then you can maintain the level of orange by adding more juice. The disadvantage of this therapy is that the new red cells and all of the other blood cells which are transfused into the bleeding patient are foreign to the patient's body. So the patient's own white cells then start a war with all of the new foreign blood cells. This can cause the patient real problems if his body was say fighting cancer at the time of the transfusion. Also there are the dangers of picking up whatever blood borne diseases the blood donor had, such as Aids, Hepatitis or BSE. These are real dangers today. Actually these risks have become much less significant in the last 10 years with leucodepleted blood and other treatments common in the more developed countries.
We are wondering if it would be possible to kill or remove all of the white blood cells from whole blood. Can one prepare a Red Blood Cell only transfusion? This would not break God's law as we understand it, because the whole transfusion would be a dead chemical soup. This idea was first proposed by Francis Flukka in an email to Gordon Ritchie.
Now the best modern transfusions have a reduced white blood cell count. A typical unit of whole blood has around 5 x 109
White cells, or 5 billion white cells and around 3000 billion red cells. Modern third generation blood filters can reduce the white blood cell count to 5 x 106 cells per unit, or 5 million cells per unit. Frozen deglycerolised blood has around the same reduction in white cells. Both filtered blood and frozen deglycerolised blood eliminate febrile reactions and Cytomegalovirus transmission from blood transfusions. It is an interesting statistic the 94% of blood in US blood banks is thrown away because it can only be stored for around 40 days and yet frozen blood which can be kept indefinitely and certainly for 10 years, is apparently uneconomic?There are new 4th generation filters in development which can reduce the white blood cell count further to 5 x 103 white blood cells per unit. These are called log6 filters because they reduce the white cell count by a million times which is 106 times and log106 = 6. Such blood would be the safest possible in transfusion terms, and in fact one article in the Lancet (by Janet Fricker March 9, 1996), about biochemically changing red cells from type A or AB to type O, described the 'Holy Grail' of blood transfusion as type O red cell only blood. This blood could be given to anyone with no adverse consequences at all (since HIV and the various herpes virus HSVs and the various Hepatitus viruses and HTLV and Epstein Barr antibodies are transferred via the white cells - so long as they do not somehow get stuck to the red cells). Such a transfusion, if truly dead, i.e. carrying no living viruses, unsurprisingly, would not break God's spiritual laws. In fact the physical is designed to illustrate the spiritual. One wonders what all of the different blood types illustrate. It must be something to do with baptisms and covenants, and blood of mediators. One wonders what blood type Jesus was in this symbolism??
Now a unit of blood with only 5 thousand white cells in it is pretty impressive and is pretty safe. It has only got a handful of WBCs in every cc. But a Christian would be sinning 5 thousand times if he took it in a non life threatening situation physiologically speaking. We need a blood unit which has either no white cells or an immeasurably low count of them. The Lords' Witnesses hope to promote research to create such a transfusion, either by chemical treatment, by even better filters, by freezing or howsoever. Many JWs have died from refusal to accept blood transfusions, and if the truth be known many although less have survived through not accepting blood transfusions due to HIV etc.
This is a complex subject, but God has given us the reasoning power to solve the equation. It would be an honour and a privilege to get this one right for him and for his people and for his ex people who still hold true to the blood prohibition of Acts 15. Anyone reading this who can think of a way to prepare true red cell only transfusions please contact us, you may well save many lives. It occurs to Gordon that blood filtration is designed to yield at least 80% of the original red cells. But if this figure was allowed to be reduced to say 10%, there would be an 8 times reduction in red cells but possibly an 8,000 times reduction in white cells and we might almost be there. And then the blood could be concentrated by a factor of 8 (not to be confused with factor 8!) to return it to 80% of its initial RBC count. This would cost 8 times as much per blood unit however. Multi stage filtering is one possibility.
Alternatively if one could just kill all the living cells in whole blood and then transfuse it immediately afterwards, this would not break God's law, since no living cells would be transfused. It would pose no danger of infection or of degraded immune response to the patient, since the war against the foreign cells is already won seeing as they are dead before they are transfused. If one could say irradiate the blood just before transfusing it, or chemically treat it, in order to kill the living matter, we would have both solved the problem of Blood Transfusions for sincere Christians and developed a better therapy for the rest of the world, because this treated transfusion would be risk free! There are some chemotherapy treatments that might be able to do this.
If this improved therapy works it would be a therapy developed as a direct result of biblical knowledge. Irradiated blood is currently used in blood transfusion therapy in the cases of cancer patients and blood relatives where TAGVHD transfusion associated graft versus host disease can be a problem in a small number of cases. Actually a lethal problem. Blood is given between 2,500 and 5,000 rads, which prevents the leucocytes (white cells) from dividing and which knocks out some of the platelets but which does not kill/burst the red blood cells. It is not known to have any bad side effects at this time - see 'Guidelines for irradiation of blood and blood components' - New York State Council on human blood and transfusion services - www.wadsworth.org/labcert/blood_tissue/irradiate.htm . We are wondering whether there is a dosage of radiation which will kill the white cells without bursting the red cells.
Finally, of course, it is ok to eat black pudding, haggis, rare steaks, sushi, etc., so long as the blood cells in the rare meat are actually dead. We do not know how long blood cells live after an animal is slaughtered. Some research should be done here.
We know from the manner in which God treated those under 20 in the wilderness, and from the fact that they could not be registered in Israel and no one under 20 can be sanctified, that is baptised in holy spirit. But what is the lower limit for water baptism?
13 Then young children were brought to him, for him to
put his
hands upon them and offer prayer; but the disciples reprimanded them.
14 Jesus, however, said: Let the young children alone, and stop
hindering them from coming to me, for the kingdom of the heavens belongs to suchlike
ones.
15 And he put his hands upon them and went from
there (Matthew 19:13-15).
This is an omission symbolism, the children were brought for Jesus to both put his hands upon and offer prayer, he did only the former.
2 Although indeed Jesus himself did not baptizing but his disciples did (John 4:2).
By the Omission Principle of the code, the greater meaning of this involves actually saying a prayer, which would result in a baptism for these kids.
13 Now people began bringing him young children for him
to touch these; but the disciples reprimanded them.
14 At seeing this Jesus was indignant and said to them: Let the young
children come to me; do not try to stop them, for the kingdom of God belongs to
suchlike ones.
15 Truly I say to you, Whoever does not receive the
kingdom of God like a young child will by no means enter into it.
16 And he took the children into his arms and began
blessing them, laying his hands upon them (Mark 10:13-16).
So now Jesus has said a blessing over them and laid his hands upon them, both of which are done in a baptism - see [204].
15 Now people began to bring him also their infants (
brefh) for him to touch these; but on seeing it the disciples began to reprimand them.Here infants were brought but Jesus responded that not infants but young children should not be stopped from coming to him. So it is clear from all of the above that infants should not be baptised in water but young children should be so baptised. However at what age does an infant become a young child from a biblical point of view?
Firstly we look at the account of Isaac, who after he was weaned was persecuted by Ishmael. Now persecution is one of the trade marks of a Christian, or should I say of a member of the true religion.
8 Now the child kept growing and came to be
weaned; and Abraham then prepared a big feast on the day of Isaac's being weaned.
9 And Sarah kept noticing the son of Hagar the
Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, poking fun (Genesis 21:8,9).
Now we know that Abraham's seed were to be afflicted for 400 years:
13 And he began to say to Abram: You may know for sure that your seed will become an alien resident in a land not theirs, and they will have to serve them, and these will certainly afflict them for 400 years (Genesis 15:13).
This affliction was of course at the hands of the Egyptians, and look! Ishmael is described as 'the son of Hagar the Egyptian' in case we did not know. So the 400 years started this day and ended on 1513Nisan14 at the passover. So this day was 1913Nisan14 which might explain the big feast that Abraham made. Isaac was born when Abraham was 100, so he was born in 1918. So Isaac was 5 years old at the time that he was born weaned and persecuted.
Now we have a look at possibly the most politically incorrect scripture in the entire bible. Of course politicians are dishonest as we all no so being politically correct is being correct by the very definition of a politician!
3 and the estimated value has to be of a male from 20
years old up to 60 years old, the estimated value must then become 50 shekels of
silver by the shekel of the holy place.
4 But if it is a female, the estimated value must then
become 30 shekels.
5 And if the age is from 5 years old up to 20 years old,
the estimated value of the male must then become 20 shekels and for the female
10 shekels.
6 And if the age is from a month old up to 5 years old,
the estimated value of the male must then become 5 shekels of silver and for the
female the estimated value must be 3 shekels of silver.
7 'Now if the age is from 60 years old upward, if it is a
male, the estimated value must then become 15 shekels and for the female 10
shekels (Leviticus 27:3,7)
This can be succinctly summarized in the table below:
| Age | Male | Female |
| 0 - 5 | 5 | 3 |
| 5 - 20 | 20 | 10 |
| 20 - 60 | 50 | 30 |
| 60 + | 15 | 10 |
Here again the holy spirit is making a distinction at 5 years old. So although we are no longer under law, we know that God's principles do not change so an 'infant' becomes a 'young child' at 5 years old. So a young child of 5 years old (by the NBLC which has been in use since 1992Elul - Gordon thinks) can be baptised, but into which covenant? We used to think that since a child is plainly too young to act as a priest and to baptise others in water, they must be baptised into the 1AC not the 2AC. But