27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God’s image he created him, male and female he created them (Genesis 1).
26 And he made out of one [man] every nation of men, to dwell upon the entire surface of the earth, and he decreed the appointed times and the set limits of the dwelling of [men] (Acts 17).
The Fundamental Christian says that Adam, who was created around 6,000 years ago according to biblical chronology, was the first man, and so Archaeology is rubbish. The Archaeologist says mankind has for a fact been around for 30,000 years and we have good evidence that he has been around for over 2 million years, so the concept that we began with Adam 6,000 years ago is rubbish and therefore Genesis is rubbish. Incidentally, if the speed of light was faster for the first half, the evening half, of the 6th creative day - see I2, then the radio carbon dating of the 2 million year old human fossils would be incorrect. In fact we understand that the speed of light was 360 times faster at the start of the 6th creative day, than it is today, and so the human fossils are crudely speaking 360 times younger than we think. For people who like this sort of thing please visit U234 - A brief history of light.
So how do we resolve this conflict between Science and Religion? They both cannot be right! Traditionally religious people just throw away their reasoning capability and say, my faith tells me that the bible is right and that is the end of it. This is a very dangerous thing to do. It is a lazy idolatry of an illogical church doctrine, it is selling God and his book, the bible, short. It happens because people in general do not have the courage of their deductions. They do not believe that they have the mental power to climb out of the trap that has been laid for them. The fact that over a billion people in the world believe in the Trinity doctrine, which amounts to the abolition of the number 2, demonstrates clearly how little confidence mankind has in his own reasoning capability. No rational man could ever accept the Catholic Trinity Doctrine, but it took a certain Isaac Newton to make that point in England, some 1650 years after Christ died.
So all those who do accept the trinity are just demonstrating how easy they are to brainwash. And the Muslim suicide bombers of the last days are busy showing us just how dangerous religious brainwashing can be. Most, if not all people with faith, throw away their reason when they join a religion and just accept the doctrine of their church or mosque or synagogue etc. So one could argue that every Christian who believes in the trinity is one step away from being a suicide bomber. But Jesus did not command us to become brainwashed idolaters of the lame spiritual understandings of lazy control freak priests or rabbis or imams. He said:
37 You must love Jehovah your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind (Matthew 22).
And the first living stone that Jesus laid in the Christian church (Peter), said...
13 Hence brace up your minds for activity, keep your senses
completely; set your hope upon the undeserved kindness that is to be brought to
you at the revelation of Jesus Christ (1 Peter 1).
This Revelation requires brain power and of course the world is being dumbed down further and further every day at the very time that the Revelation is occurring because there is a battle that we are the victims of between the holy angels and the deadly demons. But we can avoid being a casualty of this war if we would only open our eyes, the eyes of our mind.
Jesus said that we should scrutinize every little detail of every scripture...
17 Do not think I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I
came, not to destroy, but to fulfill.
18 For truly I say to you that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass away from the Law [of God, the whole bible] by any means and not all things take place (Matthew 5).
Let us therefore apply this kind of scrutiny to the account of the creation of mankind in Genesis 1.
26 And God [Elohim literally
'Gods' meaning the holy spirit under God's direction] went on to say: Let us make man [~da]
image, according to our likeness [an image
of an image of God, a son of a son of God - human children of the angels], and let them have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and the domestic
animals and all the earth and every moving [animal] that is moving upon the
27 And God [Elohim meaning Jehovah himself - see Genesis 2:4,7] proceeded to create the man [~dah] in his image, in God's image he created him [a direct son of God, a direct image of God with no intermediary. God's firstborn human son. God's second direct son after Satan - see Intro19]; male and female he created them 28 Further, God blessed them [Adam and Eve] and God said to them: Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it, and have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living [being] that is moving upon the earth (Genesis 1).
4 This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of
their being created, in the day that Jehovah God [YHWH Elohim] made earth and
heaven (Genesis 2).
7 And Jehovah God [YHWH Elohim qualifying the ambiguous verses 27 and 28] proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul (Genesis 2).
Now at first sight this looks like a rather repetitive account of the creation of mankind. But let us examine these 3 verses a bit closer since they may just hold the secret to our very existence within them. Here is a comparative table of the two successive accounts of our creation...
|Action||Verse 26||Verses 27 and 28|
|Who does the creating?||Us: God and the holy spirit, his wife. Father and Mother.||God himself. Adam had no heavenly mother. Satan was the head of the Holy Spirit, the head of God's wife. He was cut out of the deal with Adam. This would have been the first time that God created an equal to Satan and created any life without Satan.|
|In whose image?||In our image (the image of the holy spirit) an image of an image, a son of a son of God||The image of God himself, an image of God directly, a first generation son of God|
|In whose likeness||The angels||n/a|
|Name||Man [~da]||The Man [~dah]|
|Created as Male and Female?||Yes||Yes, Male and Female he created them|
|Be fruitful become many fill the earth?||No||Yes|
|What do they have in subjection?||Fish, flying creatures, domestic animals, all the earth, every crawling animal moving on the earth||Fish, flying creatures, every living [being] creature moving on the earth|
So verses 27 and 28 are not merely a repetition of the creative act of verse 26. Verses 27 and 28 are the creation of something different from verse 26. Verse 26 is the creation of 'man', of mankind, of pre-adamic man. Pre-adamic man was created by the holy angels in the image of his angelic creators.
They continued the iterative (dare we say evolutionary) design process from Homo Habilis, through Homo Erectus to Modern man, Homo Sapiens, the post ice age variety. By Pre-adamic we mean Homo Sapiens the final version that was indeed in the image of the angels and therefore was a fully spiritual being. We do not mean the earlier pre ice age varieties.
Adam was created by God without the involvement of his wife, the holy spirit, and made in the image of God alone, being a direct first generation son of God, like Satan was. God is perfect, the angels are not, these are therefore two different images and therefore two different creations.
Pre-adamic man was not blessed, Adam was. Adam was blessed with procreating power in order that he could fill the earth, and with authority over every living being including the pre-adamics on the earth. Adam did actually fill the earth, the pre-adamics did not.
Pre-adamics were human children of the angels. They were created in the image and the likeness of the angels. In other words they were born as angels at the same time that they were born as humans (since like begets like). They were born again when they were born. Therefore like the angels they were sterile unless activated on a per child basis by God (which is the case with all judicially living beings - who follow the pattern of Abraham and Sarah in conception). And like the angels they did not marry...
30 for in the resurrection neither do men marry nor are women given in marriage, but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).
But Adam who was made in God's image but not said to be made in his likeness, was not born again when he was born. Rather he was born again aged 30 as an archetype of Michael's entrance into Jesus and Immanuel's exit into his associated angel - see Intro16 and U41.
Death came to humans from Satan and through Adam...
21 For since death is through a man, resurrection of the dead is
also through a man.
22 For just as in Adam all are dying, so also in the Christ all will be made alive (1 Corinthians 15).
The pre-adamics did not die, since death came through Adam and since angels do not die other than through a capital sin in which case they go to Tartarus, which is the first death for them. Their human bodies died but their spirits were raptured at the same time into their associated angelic bodies. Presumably there was no reason for their bodies to grow old, so they grew to maturity and remained in a steady state until they were raptured we imagine. They became the angels that they really were at their 'death'.
According to www.drmcdougall.com (the McDougall Newsletter January 2006 vol 5 number 1) ...
No prehistoric remains have been found of people older than 50 years. (This is also discussed in 'Anti-aging is an oxymoron' L. Hayflick, Journal of Gerontology 2004 June 59 (6): B573-6).
Although they did not actually fall asleep in death but were transferred in the twinkling of an eye so as not to see it.
Whereas Adam, having sinned, got his everlasting inheritance as a son of God, because Jesus ransomed him.
6 Who gave himself a corresponding ransom over all, [this is] what is to be witnessed to at its own particular times (1 Timothy 2).
Adam was made in God's image in the sense that he was alone without brothers or sisters or family in his form in the Garden for 19 years, and in fact his life followed the pattern of God's early life - see U41. God likewise was alone before he created any other life forms. Furthermore being a son of God he has an inheritance which is to be a God, even a God to the angels, just as the angels and indeed all sons of God can aspire to be Gods one day just like their father. They merely have to grow up first!
Furthermore Adam, once he was born again, became a direct son of God, a first generation son of God, just like Satan. Whereas the angels are in general sons of sons of God. This genealogical descent puts Adam equal to Satan. This will have been the cause of Satan's jealousy. Furthermore, as we shall discover, the angels could not themselves procreate directly without the help of the holy spirit, whereas Adam could and so again in this way he was in God's image not the image of the angels. So in fact, in procreative terms, Adam was ahead of Satan whilst he was in the Garden. One can therefore regard Satan's murder of our parents as an act of genocide intended to remove this advantage that the firstborn human, Adam, had over the firstborn angel, Satan.
So Adam was an image of God whereas the pre-adamics were an image of the angels, or an image of an image of God. And just as God is much more intelligent than the angels so Adam was much more intelligent than the pre-adamics who struggled to do a 2D cave painting of an animal and took 10,000 years to domesticate the sheep.
God involved the angels in the creation of pre-adamic man in order that they would feel a kinship with them and a responsibility for them. This would make it easier for them to learn from us just as parents learn from their children even today.
Traditionally mankind believes them to be effectively neuter. In favour of this point of view we have the fact that they are always referred to as 'sons of God' in the bible and never as 'daughters of God'.
7 When the morning stars joyfully cried out together,
And all the sons of God began shouting in applause? (Job 38).
6 For who in the skies can be compared to Jehovah? Who can resemble Jehovah among the sons of God? (Psalm 89)
43 Be glad, O heavens, together with him, and let all the angels of God worship him. Be glad, you nations, with his people, and let all the sons of God strengthen themselves in him, (LXXBagster Deuteronomy 32).
Demons here are evening stars with Satan being the moon, and angels are morning stars with Jesus being the Sun. Furthermore female Christians eventually become sons of God, not daughters of God...
9 Happy are the peacemakers since they will be called
'sons of God' (Matthew 5).
26 You are all, in fact, sons of God through your faith in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3).
So women are to become male sons of God? Surely only confused mankind goes in for gender re-assignment surgery?
We know from the scriptures that God hates homosexuality...
22 And you must not lie down with a male the same as you lie down with a woman. It is a detestable thing (Leviticus 18).
We know from the scriptures and from common sense that Lesbianism is un-natural...
26 That is why God gave them up to disgraceful sexual
appetites, for both their females changed the natural use of themselves into one
contrary to nature
27 and likewise even the males left the natural use of the female and became violently inflamed in their lust toward one another, males with males, working what is obscene and receiving in themselves the full recompense, which was due for their error. (Romans 1).
God even detests cross dressing...
5 No garb of an able-bodied man should be put upon a woman, neither should an able-bodied man wear the mantle of a woman; for anybody doing these things is something detestable to Jehovah your God (Deuteronomy 22).
So would God put a female human in a male angelic body? Absolutely not. So either the 'sons of God' are asexual, or they are male and female like we are. But would God put a male into a neuter body? Well such an action would not transgress any of his laws on sex, so it is possible. So the question now becomes, are the angels all neuter or are they male and female?
Well we read in Genesis that the demons came down and married women before the flood and had children with them...
2 then the sons of the [true] God began to notice the daughters of men, that they were good-looking; and they went taking wives for themselves, namely, all whom they chose (Genesis 6).
4 The Nephilim proved to be in the earth in those days, and also
after that, when the sons of the [true] God continued to have
relations with the daughters of men and they bore sons to them, they were the mighty ones who were of old, the men of fame (Genesis 6).
These are not the actions of asexual neuter beings. These angels were not said to come down because they wanted to procreate, they were said to come down because the women looked good. So they must have felt some kind of sex drive. In fact their sex drive was so strong that they sinned, by coming down here and leaving their proper dwelling place of the heavens...
6 And the angels that did not keep their original position but forsook their own proper dwelling place he has reserved with eternal bonds under dense darkness for the judgment of the great day (Jude).
Actually their spirits left their proper dwelling place of an angelic body and came down in super hero human bodies to sleep with women and create Nephilim.
Jesus adds to the debate with his answer to the sadducees (who say there is no resurrection) about marriage in the Kingdom of God...
28 Consequently, in the resurrection, which of the
7 will she be [a] woman of (gunh)?
For they all had (ecw) her.
29 In reply Jesus said to them: You are mistaken, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God,
30 for in the resurrection neither do they marry (gamew) nor are they given in marriage (gamizw), but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).
24 Jesus said to them: Is not this why you are mistaken,
your not knowing either the Scriptures or the power of God?
25 For when they rise (anisthmi) out of [the] dead [ones] (nekroV), neither do they marry (gamew) nor are they given in marriage (gamizw), but are as angels in the heavens (Mark 12).
34 Jesus said to them: The sons of this system of
things marry (gamew) and are given in marriage (gamizw),
35 but those who have been counted worthy of gaining that system of things and of the resurrection, the [one] out of [the] dead [ones] (nekroV) neither marry (gamew) nor are given in marriage (gamizw).
36 In fact, neither can they die (apoqnhskw) anymore, for they are like the angels, and they are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection (Luke 20).
In all three accounts of his answer we read that Jesus made the distinction between men marrying and women being given in marriage and then compared this situation to that of the angels. We see that 'sons of this system' can be given in marriage and are therefore female. We also see from verse 36 that women who are resurrected as sanctified born again human women are called 'sons of the resurrection' and 'sons of God'. So 'sons of God' can in fact be human daughters of God with associated angels. The word 'sons' really is used to mean offspring. This site uses the term 'sons of the 1AC', to mean men and women and children with a faith that makes them beneficiaries of the first Abrahamc covenant - see I29. So nothing Jesus said forces angels to be neuter.
Jesus did not actually answer the question as to who would get the woman in the Kingdom, he just said there would be no marriage for those who have risen from the dead. This does not mean there will be no marriage in the kingdom of God. It means there will be no marriage amongst those who are not judicially dead and are therefore as angels in heaven. There will be no marriage for those who are spirit baptised, those who are born again, those who have associated angelic bodies - see I12.
Marriage is an institution for the dead, the judicially dead. It is for the judicially first dead and the judicially second dead.
It is fine to be married for a long as you live, if you are not going to live for long. For death ends the marriage 'till death us do part'. But it is no good getting married if you are going to live indefinitely or forever. So angels do not get married, as such a thing would be a monstrous commitment. Likewise the saints do not get married in the Kingdom of God, but those who are not saints do - or maybe they do not since they have indefinite life in non ageing human bodies so although second dead (in the sense that they do not have associated angels) are not actually under a death sentence?
Now Jesus is saying two things. He says that being given in marriage does not occur in heaven and he says that marrying does not occur in heaven. So he is telling us that there are both male and female angels. For it is females who are given in marriage and males who marry. But the power of Jesus' seeming labouring of this point is that there exist both sexes in the heavens...
12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).
Given that all scriptures have power, there is no irrelevant repetition or meaningless labouring of points in the scriptures. If we are told that men do not get married and neither do women but are as angels in this respect, then we must have male and female angels.
The slam dunk proof that there are female angels and indeed angelic families is in Ephesians...
14 On account of this I bend my knees to the Father,
15 to whom every family in heaven and on earth owes its name (Ephesians 3).
There are two aspects of the code which absolutely nail the existence of male and female angels. We will just state them here for completeness.
1. 'Male and female he created them' Genesis (1:27) applies to humans in the literal meaning, and angels in the greater meaning, the first word thread, see U300.
27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God's image he created him; male and female he created them (Genesis 1).
2. Matthew 1 is the angelic ancestry of the angel Michael in the second word symbolic thread - see Matthew. And it has 4 women in it (Mary, Tamar, Ruth and Rahab). These 4 are therefore 4 angelic women. 3 of these women, Tamar, Ruth and Rahab, only appear once in the account. So by the Repetition Principle of the code these nouns mean Tamar, Ruth and Rahab in all threads. So it is our exceeding great pleasure to introduce you to 3 beautiful female angels in the heavens, whose names are Date Palm (Tamar), Beauty/Friend (Ruth) and Large (Rahab). There names will be spoken in the heavenly language of course, but this is what their names mean in English.
Furthermore, the only logical reason why a female angel might be called 'date palm' would be that she invented the date palm we suppose. So yes, heavenly women can invent brilliant things. But who invented the Mosquito? - surely it was a demon.
So yes, there are male and female angels. The pre-adamics are in the image of these angels in the respect of Gender. In fact Gender is a tutor leading to love. God himself is neither male nor female because his love is perfect. We are imperfect in our love, so God made us and our brothers and sisters, the angels, and the pre-adamics, male and female, to teach all of us the surpassing value of love. Actually to teach us all the surpassing value of loving just one person.
Sex is a tutor to love. All beings are sexual both human and angelic until they become Gods. Gods have perfect love and therefore need no tutor and therefore are asexual. Even if you hate all of your brothers, there will be some woman somewhere that you love. Regrettably in this system she may not love you. But nonetheless the lesson in the second commandment, to love your brother, is there. In a similar vein one needs both a king and a priest until one has fully grasped the first commandment we think. Although born again sons of God would appear to be able to be both?
At last we can nail the understanding of these statements. The image of God is the spirit which is loaded into all his sons. It is the operating system, the software of angels and humans. It is a self writing operating system. We all get the same software, the same starting spirit.
4 One body there is, and one spirit, even as you were called in the one hope to which you were called;
5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism;
6 one God and Father of all [persons], who is over all and through all and in all. (Ephesians 4 NWT)
But the angels implemented this software in pre-adamics and God himself implemented it in Adam. Now we know from page U255, that the spirit of God enters into two vessels at the mid term of the pregnancy. It enters both into the human vessel and into a shared angelic server, which is effectively a second-dead angelic brain, an archive for your daily memories. If late one is born again then it comes off the shared server, the second dead server, and goes onto a dedicated server.
Now the angels would have been pretty good at interfacing the software of God's spirit into the human brain and connecting to the shared angelic server for security of spirit in the event of sickness or death of the human. But they would not have been as good as God. God indirectly created pre-adamic man through the angels. He directly created Adam. God's engineering is perfect. The engineering of the angels is excellent but not perfect for they are not God. So Adam would have been a superior being to the pre-adamics which explains why the pre-adamics managed only to domesticate the sheep and do a few 2D cave paintings. Whereas Adam, well, he is much closer to being an angel inside a human, so he declared war on his brother and built cities and cathedrals and war chariots and discovered nuclear fission and more recently even the Higgs Boson. Putting this another way the pre adamics had a dial up connection to their heavenly intelligence, whereas the adamics have broadband. So we are made a little lower than angels whereas our pre-adamic ancestors were made considerably lower than angels. In fact just as God is way more intelligent than the angels, so Adam, the image of God, was way more intelligent than the pre-adamics, the images of the angels.
KJV But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that thou art mindful of him? or the son of man, that thou visitest him?
NWT But a certain witness has given proof somewhere, saying: What is man that you keep him in mind, or [the] son of man that you take care of him?
GLT but one fully testified somewhere, saying, "What is man, that You are mindful of him; or the son of man, that You look upon him?
YLT and one in a certain place did testify fully, saying, 'What is man, that Thou art mindful of him, or a son of man, that Thou dost look after him?
ED Testified but somewhere one, saying: What is man, that thou dost remember him; or a son of man, that thou dost observe him?
KIT he bore thorough witness but somewhere someone saying What is man that you are remembering of him, or son of man that you are looking upon him?
KJV Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; thou crownedst him with glory and honour, and didst set him over the works of thy hands:
NWT You made him a little lower than angels; with glory and honor you crowned him, and appointed him over the works of your hands.
GLT You made him a little less than [the] angels; You crowned him with glory and honor; and "You set him over the works of Your hands.
YLT Thou didst make him some little less than messengers, with glory and honour Thou didst crown him, and didst set him over the works of Thy hands,
ED Thou didst make less him a little while then messengers; with glory and with honor thou didst crown him;
KIT you made less him short something beside angels, to glory and to honor you crowned him, and you set down him upon the works of the hands of you,
NWT 9 but we behold Jesus, who has been made a little lower than angels, crowned with glory and honor for having suffered death, that he by God's undeserved kindness might taste death for every [man] (Hebrews 2).
4 What is mortal-man [Enosh
in Hebrew] that you keep him in mind, And the son of earthling-man [Adam
in Hebrew] that you visit/go to him? [God
visited Abraham in Genesis 18 - see U154]
5 You also proceeded to make him a little less than gods [angels], And with glory and splendour you then crowned him (Psalm 8).
Strong says of the Hebrew word Enosh... vAna/ ĕnôwsh, en-oshe´; from 605 vn:a'; properly a mortal (and thus differing from the more dignified 120 ~d'a'); hence a man.
Now the sons of Adam were mortal, being under a death penalty, begin killed by their own bodies. But the pre-adamics were not mortal in that sense, being under no death penalty and being born again as an angel when they became human, being the human children of the living angels. The pre-adamics were not under any death penalty. So they were raptured into their angels if their human body failed. The sons of Adam are obviously post Adamic. So it is the flawed mortal adamics that were made a little lower than angels and crowned with glory and honour. Whereas the pre-adamics were made a lot lower than the angels, in the image of the angels.
So Adam, like Satan before him, had God as a direct father. Fathers visit sons. Adam is God's youngest direct son. Of course he would go to him!
The second human creation of 'the man' is further specified by the phrase 'male and female he created them' whereas the first creation of 'man' is not so specified. Adam and Eve were told to fill the earth, whereas pre-adamic man were not told to fill the earth. Furthermore, Man, pre-adamic man, did not have a wife...
20 But for Man [~d'a'] there was found no helper as a complement for him (Genesis 2)
The scripture does not say: But for the man, there was found no helper as a complement for him. So Adamic man had a wife, but again pre-adamic man had no wife. So pre-adamic man could not autonomously procreate and did not get married, just like the angels. We initially thought that this meant he was asexual. But archaeology is against that hypothesis. There are cave paintings of men and women having sex which predate Adam. So then we theorized that pre-adamic man was male and female and sexual but sterile. This would certainly fit the scriptural constraints that we have discovered for him. Pre-adamic man would be male and female in form and in character but not reproductively male and female. The big change with Adam and Eve would then have been the capability for independent human-human sexual reproduction. Prior to that humans were made some other way and could not reproduce without assistance from the angels. Although Eve only became fertile after she sinned, since sexual reproduction is the preserve of the dead as is marriage. Let us therefore state two important scriptural findings here...
Marriage is an institution for the dead
Sexual reproduction is the procreating means of the dead.
When God brought Eve to Adam, he said:
23 And he said, the man: This is at last bone of my bones and flesh of
This one will be called woman, because from Man [Xya] this one was taken (Genesis 2).
17 I can count all my bones [Jesus' church, 206 members when he was sacrificed - the number of bones in a human body]. They themselves look, they gaze upon me [they watched him die on the stake] (Psalm 22).
So Eve came from pre-adamic 'Man' as opposed to 'the man'. But she was gene enhanced using the genetic material of Adam, symbolised by his rib, his bone. We are using skeletal building blocks to symbolise genetic building blocks and pre-sacrifice disciple building blocks, pillars of the church of Jesus' body. Peter was the first bone of Jesus' body, and start of his wife - see I35. Although the numbers we have of these building blocks are different. For most people have 23 Chromosomes and 24 ribs. But with one rib removed you would have 23 ribs. So the bones are the chromosomes and the flesh is the entire body, which is built from the genetic material in the chromosomes. Chromosomes and bones can be counted, flesh cannot be counted.
So this symbolism tells us that Eve was genetically similar to Adam. But we know that sexual fertility is controlled and programmed by a single chromosome pair. We know that this is true today. It is the sex chromosome which is XY in a man and XX in a woman. So one can genetically create a woman from a man, but not the other way round. The result of the application of this chromosome to Eve was not that she eventually became fertile however. Fertility is only permitted to the dead. The living who exist in non adamic bodies cannot procreate either in the garden or in the kingdom. She was a pre-adamic female who was baptised in Adam's rib. This did not make her into a clone or a sister of Adam. No incest occurred.
Eve was sterile as all pre-adamics were whilst in her indefinitely lasting non ageing body. When she lost that body and had dead flesh with an associated angel, then she could reproduce sexually.
Then the commentary continues with...
24 That is why man [Xya]
will leave his father and his
mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh.
25 And both of them continued to be naked, the man and his wife, and yet they did not become ashamed (Genesis 2).
In early Genesis, 'the man' [~d'a'h'] is Adam, man [~d'a'] is pre-adamic man, and man [Xya] is all mankind - see above and see U1. But pre-adamic men did have genetic mothers and fathers like we have today, but they could not have childrenin the absence of a divine consent, since the children were living rather than constructively dead.
The pre-adamic children were carried in somewhat surrogate pre-adamic mothers just as Jesus and the non adamics were carried in surrogate adamic mothers and just as Adam was carried in a surrogate pre adamic mother.
Now Adam left God and the Holy spirit and broke God's law and stuck to his wife. He fulfilled the prophecy in Genesis 2:24-25. So he had a mother. We need to restate that because it is really important.
Adam had a mother. He was not a bastard.
In order to have a human child God had to become human, for like begets like. We call the human form of Jehovah humaniah (which means 'God is human' in English-Hebrew). In order to make an angelic child God likewise has to become angelic. We call his human form Angeliah, for the same reason. When God made the firstborn angel (who was Lucifer, who became Satan - see intro19), he procreated with his heavenly slave girl, his heavenly Mary, whom we call Matriarch - see U264a.
38 Then Mary said: Look! Jehovah's slave girl! May it take place with me according to your declaration. At that the angel departed from her (Luke 1 NWT).
What masters do with a slave girls is make them pregnant. So first God made an angel for himself. Then he made Matriarch. Then he made the first born angel, Lucifer who became Satan. Matriarch was created prior to Satan, but first born are male in the bible. Matriarch was not born to a mother (we think). So it is also the case that...
Satan had a mother. He was not a bastard (not at first anyway).
What this means is that Adam was a direct brother of Satan, a first generation son of God. Whereas the pre-adamics were merely children of an angelic pair, a male and a female angel.
This prophetic drama of Adam's leaving his parents and sticking to his wife is telling us that pre-adamic man did not stick to his wife in that way, he did not get married, he did not have a wife to stick to (but pre-adamics did pair up to raise children).
Incidentally Matriarch herself was created and raised only by Jehovah with no mother. This does not break God's law for people with Gender because god has no Gender and has perfect love. So if he procreates as a gender free person then there only needs to be one parent. God, having perfect love, could show Matriarch the love both of a mother and of a father without actually being either.
This is covered fully in U314 (the gory detail of original sin) and described in the Gospel of Philip. But Satan did not appear in a snake. He acted like a snake with Eve. He appeared in a human body which he demanded from God since Adam had one and was his brother. He demanded it after Adam was born again aged 30 (the age that Jesus was when he was 'generated from above/born again' by angelic possession at his baptism). At that point Adam had both an angelic and a human body whereas Satan, his brother only had an angelic soul. What Satan did with his human body was to seduced Eve, in a slimy serpentine manner. He took advantage of a woman's insatiable desire for status, claiming that by eating from the tree she would become like a God, knowing good and bad. In fact he sold her death by dressing it up as divinity. He also showed Eve by example how to seduce Adam, taking advantage of a man's insatiable desire for women. For both of them were sexually inexperienced in the garden.
25 And both of them continued to be naked, the man and his wife, and yet they did not become ashamed (Genesis 2 NWT).
One only feels shame and embarrassment about nakedness and needs to cover up when one realises just how sensitive those areas are - by having sex.
It is very important to put this in context today. Desiring sex and having a lot of sex and desiring money and having a lot of money are neither of them sins. But if the desire for sex or money or both is greater than the desire for righteousness and God then these desires can lead you into sin which when accomplished brings death. So sex is not a sin, but the desire for it is the most dangerous desire a man has. And likewise having financial and other status is not a sin but the desire for it is the most dangerous desire that a woman has. This is the mature view we get from a deep understanding of Adam's fall. Things are no different today except that today both sexes have both desires - see I25a.
The reason why Eve said, on giving birth to Cain: I have produced a man with the aid of Jehovah (Genesis 4:1), is that Cain was begotten by procreation between Satan and Eve, and Eve only became fertile sexually because she sinned and was therefore given a 'dead' ageing human body. Pre-adamics were infertile in the sense that they could not reproduce sexually. Satan impregnated Eve after she sinned - for more on this see the Gospel of Philip and see U314..
1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare
Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. (KJVi)
1 Now Adam had intercourse with Eve his wife and she became pregnant. In time she gave birth to Cain and said: I have produced a man with the aid of Jehovah. (NWT)
1 And the man knew his wife Eve. And she conceived and bore Cain, and said, I have gotten a man with the help of Jehovah. (GLT)
1 And the man knew Eve his wife, and she conceiveth and beareth Cain, and saith, 'I have gotten a man by Jehovah;' (YLT)
2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. (Genesis 4 KJVi)
2 Later she again gave birth, to his brother Abel. And Abel came to be a herder of sheep, but Cain became a cultivator of the ground. (Genesis 4 NWT)
2 And she continued to bear his brother, Abel. And Abel became a shepherd of flocks. And Cain became a tiller of the ground. (Genesis 4 GLT)
2 and she addeth to bear his brother, even Abel. And Abel is feeding a flock, and Cain hath been servant of the ground. (Genesis 4 YLT)
The best translation here is YLT. The NWT is a disaster. The most literal we can make is as follows...
1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived and bore
Cain,. And said: I have erected/produced/obtained/acquired/created a man with
Jehovah [not with Adam].
2 And she addeth to bear his brother, namely Abel. And Abel is feeding a flock, and Cain hath been servant of the ground (Genesis 4).
Adam did know Eve, that is what produced Abel. The order of events was as follows.
1. Satan knew Eve whilst being the head of god's wife and existing in God's
2. Eve conceived.
3. Adam knew Eve.
4 Eve gave birth to Cain. Cain was fathered by Satan in God's flesh - hence Eve said: I have produced a man with Jehovah and not with Adam.
5. Adam knew Eve again.
6. Eve gave birth to Abel.
Now we must consider the following 3 verses...
23 Then the man said: This is at last bone of my bones And flesh of my flesh. This one will be called Woman, Because from man this one was taken.
24 Because of this a man will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh.
25 And both of them continued to be naked, the man and his wife, and yet they did not become ashamed. (Genesis 2 NWT)
The question is: Did Adam say verse 24 as a prophecy or was verse 24 a commentary like verse 25?
Well you cannot become one flesh with your woman/wife unless both of you are dead. God would not make Adam prophesy his own sin or he would know that he had to sin in order for that prophecy to be fulfilled. God never puts people in that position. So it must be commentary by the holy spirit. The holy spirit appears be saying that it is the attractiveness of women that will prise a man from his parents and that he should then stick to his wife. It is most definitely a prophecy that Adam will sin, for without sin there is no death and without death there is no marriage.
Were Adam and Eve engaged when they first knew each other (after Satan pierced Eve)? They could not get engaged whilst they were both living. And God would not have spoken to them about marriage until after they sinned. And he did not speak to them between Eve's sin and Adam's sin. So they cannot have been engaged.
Jesus was born by in vivo fertilisation of a surrogate mother Mary by the Holy Spirit. He was conceived asexually. He was non adamic, not a son of post fall Adam - see Intro17. Now Jesus is called the Last Adam, so putting this the other way around, Adam was the first Jesus. So Adam was created in the same way that Jesus was created - asexually - see I6. He was also born by in vivo fertilisation by Holy Spirit of a surrogate pre-adamic woman. But then all the pre-adamics were also created asexually as was Jesus.. But then we realise that Adam was pre-adamic as regards his method of creation, since sexual reproduction came later. So the pre-adamics were created in the same way as Jesus was and the non adamics were created, which means that it is us, the adamics, who are the odd ones out! And now we see it all.
In the Kingdom of God, everyone has been born again for Jesus said...
3 In answer Jesus said to him: Most truly I say to you, Unless anyone is born again [literally generated from above], he cannot see the kingdom of God (John 3 NWT)
And obviously when you are in that Kingdom you do actually see it. We can be born again/generated from above in any of the following 6 ways...
1. Born again angelically whilst alive as a human in non adamic flesh. This is a living
resurrection from the 2nd death, from angelic death (which all human are
effectively born into - since they are born without an angelic soul)..
2. Born again non adamically whilst alive as a human. This is a living resurrection from the first death penalty, from adamic death in our flesh, from ageing.
3. Born again as a human from the first death. This is a resurrection from being asleep in the first death to being alive as a non adamic human.
4. Born again as an angel from the first death. This is a resurrection from being asleep in the first death to being alive as an angel.
5. Born again as a human from the second death. This is a release from Gehenna in non adamic human form.
6. Born again as an angel from the second death. This is a release from Gehenna in angelic human form.
7. Born again angelically whilst alive as a human in adamic flesh. This is a living resurrection from the 2nd death, from angelic death (which all human are effectively born into - since they are born without an angelic soul).
So all of these born agains are 'as angels in heaven'. They none of them get married to each other except category 7.
30 For in the resurrection neither do men marry nor are women given in marriage, but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).
A marriage produces children by sexual reproduction and sexual reproduction can only produce constructively dead children, children under the adamic death penalty. So a marriage requires one or both parents to be under that death penalty, i.e. to have ageing dying flesh. No one in the Kingdom is under that penalty.
So all those in the Kingdom are like Jesus and Adam and the pre-adamics. So now we can see that the born again post adamics of the Kingdom of God are in the same reproductive situation as the pre-adamics and the non adamics and the angels. It is only the judicially 'dead' post adamics who procreate sexually and who get married. We are the odd ones out have have children in a non standard manner!!!
The angels effectively took the first human in the archeological records, homo habilis, all the way to the modern human, homo sapiens, by an iterative design process during the first half of the 6th creative day. We do not want to use the word 'evolution', but the fossil record appears to show that the pre-adamics were regularly upgraded from the homo habilis to modern man through various stages reached by the intelligent design expertise of the angels, presumably carried out on a Genesis biological design computer. Once the pre-adamic design was perfected, God made Adam. Then Adam sinned so as to come under a death penalty enforced upon his flesh, and only them did God give him the ability to procreate, which effectively made Adam a God of the dead and put mankind into mass production. Hence the command that he should go forth and multiply, that he should fill the earth
The pre-adamics died out and did not go through the flood, because we read...
7 So Jehovah said: I am going to wipe men whom I have created off the surface of the ground, from man to domestic animal, to moving animal and to flying creature of the heavens, because I do regret that I have made them (Genesis 6).
The flood destroyed the sons of Adam and their offspring, not the pre-adamics who were raptured before it came, as we show later in this article. Adam stated that Eve was to become the mother of everyone living. So Adam knew that pre-adamic reproduction would end.
20 After this Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she had to become the mother of everyone living (Genesis 3).
'Eve' actually means 'living [one]' (she did not lose her angelic life when she sinned because her sin was a deception on her by Satan). Eve could not become mother of everyone living until after Adam and the pre-adamics had died of course. So the pre-adamics might have died out during Adam's 930 year life, or possibly they lasted until the flood.
Pre-adamics lived in extended family groups. Each kid had a mother and a father whose genes were used by the angels in the creation of the kid as in the case of Jesus. Though the somewhat surrogate mother and father were not bound in marriage to each other, they must have been party of a child rearing agreement, as the angels are.
So here is the whole deal. The pre-adamics were in the image of the angels rather than God so they were not as advanced as Adam who was in the image of God who is more intelligent than the angels. So they had less powerful brains and therefore ran a less powerful operating system. They were running DOS if you like. Adam and his son run Windows 3.1 and the angels run Windows 7 and God himself runs Cray OS.
All 4 of these operating systems are the spirits of free willed loving spiritual beings, abstract thinkers. But they differ in CPU speed and intellectual capability. God blew his spirit (the Wndows 3.1 version) into Adam and the angels blew their spirits (DOS) itno the pre-adamics. The reason we say that the pre-adamic mothers and fathers were somewhat surrogate is that although their genes were mixed when the pre adamic mother carried the foetus., the 6th creative day was in progress so man was still being created. so the angels would gene zap the foetus to add functionality or even fix bugs, as each new pre-adamic was born. So they were born in precisely the same manner as Jesus was - for more on that please see Intro17.
Each one of us is a combination of our memories and our experience. Our memories are stored on our hard disk and our experience is encoded in a self re-written operating system. Every time we learn something new and it is adopted into our character, our Windows OS is re-written, so that we function in a new way the next time we get into that situation. That is how our experience is encoded. So when we are raptured into angelic bodies our operating system is upgrade from Windows 3.1 to Windows 7, or from AdamOS to AngelOS, but the upgrade is not of the basic AdamOS that we were born with, no it is of the AdamOS that our experience has rewritten. Indeed that is what AI tries to do. DOS and Windows are dead Operating Systems they do not learn. AI is a learning OS which recodes itself from its experience. So our spirits are AI software, self learning self coding operating systems.
|Son of God||Operating System||Computer 'equivalent'|
But since pre-adamics were living and not under a death sentence, they could only have children if their reproductive power was switched on. This would presumably have been done through the HIRA gene.
An article published by the BBC on October 29th 2005 reports that scientists have discovered a gene which makes normal sexually competent humans either sterile or fertile.
Apparently a man with good sperm and a woman with good eggs do not conceive unless the two gametes can do the right genetic dance when they meet. And the
Choreographer of conception is the HIRA Gene. This gene determines the dance steps in fertilisation. If there is the slightest mutation or defect in the HIRA gene then
the sperm treads on the toe of the egg during the genetic mating dance, and its no baby.
This is why some people are infertile today even though everything appears to be working normally.
So scientists have just discovered a genetic mechanism that God designed to make humans fertile or infertile. Perhaps this gene was inactive in the pre-adamics.
Most mating behaviour in humans and animals involves a dance of some sort. And here God has our genes also doing a dance. We are so fractal, our very bodies declaring the molecular behaviour of our DNA. It would appear that pre-adamic man had two left feet however.
But under what conditions would the angels switch on the HIRA gene and then gene zap the foetus. Well today men and women marry who they like and have children with whomsoever they like often out of wedlock. But 100 years ago women did not really marry men unless their father approved and women did not have children out of wedlock so much. So the father had a say in when the daughter could start to procreate. Before Adam the holy spirit had that type of say. Today too many girls and boys will choose partners fo all sorts of reasons and the result may not yield a loving environment for their children. In those circumstance the angels would not make a ore-adamic couple fertile. They essentially only gave children to couples who were living in a morally sustainable way and would provide a loving home for the child. This is a much better way to grow a population than what we do today. Essentially being made fertile was like a baptism, a baptism into precreation. This is how it will work in the Kingdom. And it is how it works with the angels.
So now we see another reason why the angels came down and took the daughters of Adam as their wives. They wanted to have kids on their own terms, without having to ask the holy spirit for them. We suspect that the holy spirit would not permit satanic angels to have angelic children at all in fact.
Adam’s father would have been the male genetic template for Adam and his mother would have been the female genetic template. But Adam was truly a son of God by holy spirit. So his genes were more than just the result of a merging of the genes of his father and his mother. He was gene zapped so as to be a mark 2 human creation of God himself, a first generation son of Jehovah.
Jesus was conceived from the very DNA of Joseph and Mary, any less would have been adultery by the holy spirit. the Holy Spirit cannot commit adultery. So Jesus was conceived in sin, but not in sin by God, in sin by Adam. He was conceived adamically...
5 Look! With error I was brought forth with birth pains, And in sin my mother conceived me. (Psalms 51 NWT).
Then God enhanced his genes to make him non adamic - see Intro17. By this we mean a son of pre fall Adam rather than post fall Adam. Genetically his human body was a 'son of man', a son of pre fall Adam. He was therefore a son of God since Adam was a direct son of God. The human body of Jesus was actually a non adamic son of David as well. This means he was a son of what David would have been had he been non adamic. He was a son of what David actually now is in Eden2. In fact David was resurrected to Eden2 when his adamic body died - see U54. So Jesus had to be non adamic to be a son of David. Likewise the pre-adamics were created by combining the human DNA of their two descended angelic parents who took human form in order to procreate, and then the angels would enhance that DNA iteratively to make the children more and more spiritual in the true version of 'evolution'. This is how man journeyed from Homo Habilis to Homo Sapiens. The journey involved hundreds of iterations and ended with the pre-adamic humans who lived at the time Adam was created.
In modern industrial parlance, pre-adamics were hand crafted prototypes made in the labs, whereas adamics were mass produced finished models with the full design spec implemented, made from the re-production line. The same could well have been true for the animals as well. In fact the design process for animals and humans used by the angels is really no different from the design process used for motor cars or computers or anything else made by mankind today. We design the device virtually on a design computer or on paper, and then make a series of prototypes, and then finally once the design specification is achieved, we go into mass production. Mass production for humans is sexual reproduction which is the blessing of Genesis 1:28. This blessing is in fact the ISO9001 approval stamp from God.
7 And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul (Genesis 2).
This dust is not what you get in a dust bowl of a Kansas prairie or in the Australian outback. It is the pre-adamics who had become like the dust particles of the earth by the time God made Adam by an in vivo fertilization of a pre-adamic woman followed by some genetic reforming.
16 And I will constitute your seed like the dust particles of the
earth, so that, if a man could be able to count the dust particles of the earth, then your seed could be
numbered (Genesis 13).
10 Who has numbered the dust particles of Jacob? (Numbers 23).
Dust is used metaphorically by God to mean a group which is large in number as well as being used literally to mean dust. So Adam was born to a pre-adamic woman of which there were very very many at that time.
19 In the sweat of your face you will eat bread until you return to the ground [God's heavenly congregation], for out of it you were taken [out of the pre-adamic system, which was a nursery school for angelic children]. For dust you are [constructively, being walking dust, dust to be due to your death sentence as a human] and to dust [all the pre-adamics outside of Eden, the particles of the ground] you will [now] return [Adam's human body may not have decayed into literal dust. It is used to father the sons of the 1BC - although perhaps only his genetic code is needed for that?] (Genesis 3).
9 Remember, please, that you have made me as though like clay. And into dust you will return me (Job 10).
Clay which can be moulded by experience. Sure our bodies decay into dust. But then Adam and the rest of us will be resurrected, returned into dust mark II, edenic humans.
We can see that the animals and Adam, the man, and Noah and his sons, were to be fruitful in the sense that they could reproduce sexually but the pre-adamics were not given that capability...
22 With that God blessed them, saying: Be fruitful and become many and fill the waters in the sea basins, and let the flying creatures become many in the earth (Genesis 1).
27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God's image
he created him; male and female he created them.
28 Further, God blessed them and God said to them: Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it, and have in
subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving upon the earth (Genesis 1).
17 Every living creature that is with you of every sort of flesh, among the flying creatures and among the beasts and among all the moving animals that move upon the earth, bring out with you, as they must swarm in the earth and be fruitful and become many upon the earth (Genesis 8).
1 And God went on to bless Noah and his sons and to say to them: Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth (Genesis 9).
A careful analysis of the above shows this...
Pre-adamics were never commanded to be fruitful, they could not reproduce
Fish were commanded to be fruitful from their creation, they always reproduced sexually
The flying creatures were permitted to become many but were not permitted to be fruitful at first (they could not reproduce sexually at first).
Adam and Eve and their sons and daughters were commanded to be fruitful, then reproduced sexually.
Birds and Land Animals were not commanded to be fruitful until they came out of the ark, so they began by reproducing with the help of the angels and then after the flood they went into mass production with sexual reproduction.
This means that the angels were iterating the design of both land animals birds and pre-adamic man until Adam came along. And the pre-adamics had no experience of sexual reproduction either themselves or from the birds or land animals which they could see. Plainly since they did not have underwater photography, they could not see fish reproducing! They had no glass and no fish tanks!
Also God brought the land animals and the birds to Adam to be named, showing the familiarity between man and those animals. These ones in the garden were in fact kingdom animals, since the garden of Eden was the Kingdom of God in terms of its creations. This would mean that Kingdom animals do not reproduce sexually. And actually land animals and birds only went into mass reproduction when God gave them to Noah as food. But in the Kingdom we are all vegetarians as Adam was, so we will not need millions of sheep or chickens or cows.
Land animals and birds only went into mass production through sexual reproduction when God gave them to Noah as food, when they came out of the ark.
The account describing the creation of Kingdom animals is as follows...
And Jehovah God went on to say: It is not good for the man to continue by
himself. I am going to make a helper for him, as a complement of him.
19 Now Jehovah God was forming from the ground every wild beast of the field and every flying creature of the heavens, and he began bringing them to the man to see what he would call each one; and whatever the man would call it, each living soul, that was its name.
20 So the man was calling the names of all the domestic animals and of the flying creatures of the heavens and of every wild beast of the field, but for man there was found no helper as a complement of him (Genesis 2).
God must have created the animals for the Kingdom of God before Adam sinned, since that sin ended the 6th creative day and started the creative Sabbath, wherein he rests from creative works...
And by the 7th day God came to the completion of his work that he had made, and
he proceeded to rest on the 7th day from all his work that he had made.
3 And God proceeded to bless the 7th day and make it sacred, because on it he has been resting from all his work that God has created for the purpose of making (Genesis 2).
God also must have created the capability to sexually reproduce in the pre flood animals during the 6th creative day. Then he turned on that capability after the flood, after the planet had been baptised.
We know that the pre-adamics, not being under any death sentence, would have been raptured when they died. It is conceivable that some of them killed each other however, and possibly lost their salvation status. Now, Adam was made in the image of God and the pre-adamics were made in the image of the angels. So the pre-adamics are the children of the angels and the adamics are the children of God. But God himself was involved in the creation of the pre-adamics for he said: Let us make man in our image. So the pre-adamics had something from God as well. Now since the angels are sons of God, they have the possibility of eternal life. And since the pre-adamics are sons of both the angels and God, they too must have this possibility, since like begets like. So God pesumably put the basic 'spiritual' subroutine in the pre-adamic BIOS. The angels then tweaked the whole system for the first half of the 6th creative, day, the evening of that day, to increase abstract thought capability which is part of spirituality. But since Adam was made in God's image, it is apparent that he and his sons will be Gods to not only the pre-adamics, but also their fathers, the angels, who are images of images of God rather than being an image of God. For the hierarchy of the fathers will be the hierarchy of the sons. So Satan could see that Adam was competition for him. Adam was a threat to his presidential position as the firstborn angel - see Intro19.
So the pre-adamics had basic salvation spirituality from the first one that was made, the original homo habilis. Well perhaps from the first one that was possessed actually. But this capability and other physical capabilities and the interaction between the two were presumably iteratively enhanced for a few thousand years until they were perfected and then Adam was made by God - see Intro2. The Kingdom of God is a new Eden for the sons of Adam and for the pre-adamics who heard the preaching of the sons of Adam. So the pre-adamics who pre-existed Adam will not be a part of that kingdom on earth. But those who lived with him and who listened to him could join a salvation covenant (in fact mediated by Adam himself - see Intro28). So they could enter into the Kingdom of God on earth. All of them of course have been angels in the heavens after they were raptured.
According to archaeological records, pre-adamic man did not worship in temples, the first temples were built after Adam. According to the bible, pre-adamic man was not blessed, meaning that he could not achieve indefinite life or everlasting life in that form as Adam and his sons could. So pre-adamic man took no spiritual test. But he was spiritual, he could think abstractly, we know this from the cave paintings. Yet these were primitive and 2 dimensional. So we can deduce that the pre-adamics had a 2 dimensional spirituality, they were capable of abstract thought to some extent but not to the extent that the sons of Adam are capable of it. They spoke but they did not write. The capability to think abstractly in great depth was the pre-requisite for God to appear through Adam and for true worship in temples to begin and for salvation testing to commence and for writing to be invented.
The archaeological records show that their mean physical lifespan was around 30-40 years, somewhat less than that of a Roman in the days of the Christ. But the pre-adamics were not under a death sentence as we are thanks to Adam. So it would not be reasonable of God to have had them falling apart due to old age. So they presumably were raptured at perhaps 50 years old when one could no longer do heavy work as a priest under law.
However their bodies would have grown up much as our bodies do, but possibly not deteriorating so fast in middle age. If a pre-adamic child died, then presumably he was simply raptured early and he finished his schooling upstairs watching his brothers below.
According to https://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2006nl/january/aging.htm (the McDougall Newsletter January 2006 vol 5 number 1) ...
"No prehistoric remains have been found of people older than 50 years." (See 'Anti-aging is an oxymoron' L. Hayflick, Journal of Gerontology 2004 June 59 (6): B573-8).
Yet we know that prehistoric man lived in communities and looked after their sick and injured so there is no environmental reason why he should not (in at least a few cases) have lived longer than 50 years were he genetically similar to modern man. So we put his lack of longevity down to his being raptured at 50 or before Furthermore the pre-adamics did not fight wars over territory as far as we know which indicates that they were aware that the earth was not all that there was. So fighting over your plot of land in the nursery school would have been seen as futile, given their future knowledge of the heavenly grammar school. The pre-adamics did not leave their father God or their mother the holy spirit, so they were not technology mad or warfare mad like us. When God made long garments of skin for Adam and for Eve (long lasting but ageing bodies), this was the first time he had done this. So the pre-adamics did not age destructively just as Adam and Eve originally did not age destructively.
So pre-adamic men were the first stage, the infant stage for the baby angels of the 6th creative day. After they were raptured, they could take the spiritual salvation tests that the angels take. Finally consider the fascinating conversation between the Pharisees and Jesus when he admitted to a previous human existence...
56 Abraham your father rejoiced greatly in the prospect of seeing
my day, and he saw it and rejoiced.
57 Therefore the Jews said to him: You are not yet 50 years old, and still you have seen Abraham?
58 Jesus said to them: Most truly I say to you, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been [in existence as a human] (John 8).
Verse 57 contains the unanswered binary question: You are not yet 50 years old, and still you have seen Abraham?
In the literal meaning no he did not see Abraham whilst he was in the form of Jesus (who was murdered at 33˝ years old by the Roman state having been condemned to death by the Pharisees and by the crowds of Jerusalem). But in the greater meaning, yes he saw him without being 50 years old perhaps because he spent less than 50 years in Enoch - see Intro16. Also he was one of the 3 men who visited Abraham him in Genesis 18, before Sodom was destroyed - see U154. Furthermore as an angel he could see Abraham. But there must be a significance to the 50 years in the greater meaning, since it has no force in the literal meaning, and all scripture must have power...
12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4 NWT).
This greater meaning, we think, is that pre-adamics were raptured at 50 years old, from which point, since they were angels, they could all see Abraham when he was born. But every pre-adamic was effectively 50 years old as regards their human experience, whereas Jesus, who was not a pre-adamic, did not have 50 years of human experience behind him when he saw Abraham.
The fossil record shows that Pre-adamics did die or at least leave their bodies with broken legs etc. So it looks like there was no angelic hospital for them. In this way they would learn each one from his own and from his brother's frailty.
On the 5th creative 'day', God made the sea animals and on the 6th he made the land animals, pre-adamic man and Adam. These days were not literal days, but epochs as we discovered in I2. In fact each creative day lasted 14,400 years of 'real time' - see U234.
All the animals are the constituent components of man from a behavioural standpoint. We are the sum of all animal
behaviour. In the 6th day, when God created all the land animals, he was declaring the way that man would behave in this system. Animals behave the way they do
by design. But humans can choose any one of the animalistic behavioural patterns,
or we can choose the pattern of Jesus, the pattern of Abraham, the path of faith.
But look! The 6th day was a creative day, It was all a creative day up to the last minute of it when Adam sinned. So God was continuously creating us throughout the entire 14,400 real time years of the 6th creative day. So that is why we could not reproduce sexually. For sexual reproduction is a form of cloning, it is a mixing and a matching of existing genetic material, it is not creating anything new. But we were being continuously tweaked and improved during the 6th day. Every new human was in fact a new creation!! That is where the angelic involvement came in, that is why the pre-adamics were children not only of their pre-adamic somewhat surrogate parents, but also of the angels. It was still a creative day.
In the 7th creative day, after Adam's sin, we could reproduce sexually, because nothing new was being made, we were just mixing and matching existing genetic material.
So the 6th creative day was the design process, a 14,400 year design process, and the 7th creative day was mass production, which in biological terms is reproduction.
So had the pre-adamics reproduced sexually, then their kids would not be new creations, so the creative day would have ended. So no they could not reproduce sexually.
What the 6th creative day was all about was the transition, the metamorphosis, from an animalistic being to a spiritual being. In that sense the lie of evolution is true. We did evolve from an animal. But not by sexual reproduction and natural selection. We evolved by continuous improvement in our design, making us more and more spiritual. And only when we were fully spiritual did God press the mass production button and allow us to reproduce sexually as the animals do. The 6th day was human prototype after human prototype.
Now we know what the angels were doing for 14,400 years. They were performing an interactive design process, taking man from an animal to a basic spiritual human, to very spiritual human. As regards the animals and the pre-adamics God called them 'good'. But as regards Adam, the super spiritual, super abstract thinking being, the spiritual equivalent of the angels themselves, God called him and his entire edenic environment 'very good'.
25 And God proceeded to make the wild beast of the earth according to its kind and the domestic animal according to its kind and every moving animal of the ground according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good (Genesis 1).
31 After that God saw everything he had made and, look! [it was] very good. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a 6th day (Genesis 1).
Humans can imagine, we can simulate in our minds, we can think abstractly. The very thing that separates us from the animals, abstract thought, is the method of communication that the bible uses to teach us. The symbolism of the bible is the essence of spirituality. Language itself is an
abstraction. A computer is not an 8 letter word it is a mechanical device. Satan is not a 5 letter word, he is
or was the head of demonic mission control in the heavens.
So we are all happy to make this one abstraction to get language. Animals cannot do this to any great extent. Chimps can do it a bit. But if we are prepared to make one abstraction to get a word, then should we not be prepared to make a second abstraction to get a symbolic meaning for that literal word? We do this anyway in regular speech. If a person is cool, this does not mean that he is poikilothermic, having a lower body temperature than the rest of us. It means that he is laid back, relaxed. This is a symbolic use of a literal word which is normally used for a physical temperature.
The bible just makes a few more symbolic uses of our vocabulary. We read it thinking, oh this is so symbolic how can I understand it? But really all language is a symbolic reference to reality in the first place, and many words have further symbolic meanings in regular speech. The bible just gives them a further Christian meaning.
In this great Kingdom there will be the living, those who are born again, those who are no longer under the adamic death sentence. In Gehenna, missing out on this kingdom there will be the second dead, those who are conscious but have no bodies, no souls, they exist as spirits in prison, watching us, but not interacting with us other than when we visit them which we must do in accordance with Matthew 25, the parable sheep and the goats. So even if your loved one ends up in Hell, you will be able to visit them in the Kingdom. For God does nothing to destroy love. It is Satan who is the enemy of love. God is love's champion and Jesus is the first of his sons to perfect his own love to the point where it is unbreakable in the harshest of circumstances. So all discussion about the power of Jesus' love is academic, it is perfected, he can relate to God as one day we will all relate to God and to him and to each other, with perfect love.
But the tutor that leads us to that love in this system and the next and many more after that is gender. All the way in fact until we become Gods ourselves. So how will the genders relate to each other in the Kingdom of God on earth?
Well since sex between the living in the Kingdom will not produce offspring, we will be able to have sex with each other when desired, so long as neither party is in a child rearing agreement.
Women will not have huge birth pains as they do in this system. Things will return to the pre-adamic level of pain. And pregnancy will result from a request by a couple to a priest for a baby as it is done in heaven. (Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven). So this whole marriage thing was really created for the constructively first dead, the walking dead, the adamically dead. Sex will not be regarded as shameful in any way in the kingdom as it is to some extent today in many cultures and religions. This conjures up the image of the swinging 60s. In fact we imagine that the Kingdom is everything good that the peace and love revolution of the 1960s promised without all the bad things that it actually delivered.
Would it not be great to live in a world where sex does not sell at all because we are all actually sexually satisfied? The fact that almost every advert today has some kind of sexual suggestion within it, says that our society is completely sexually frustrated. That frustration is from Satan not from God. The coke dealer gets you hooked on the drug and then limits the supply in order to control you. This world does that with sex and has turned it into a drug. In the Kingdom desires will be less inflamed and more loving and more satisfied. We will not be subjected to endless pornography in adverts, newspapers, movies, women's attire and the internet as we are today.
Einstein said: Religion without science is blind, science without religion is lame.
Sir Isaac Newton believed that mankind owed it to God as a debt to search for his laws in his physical universe, the cosmos, and to search for his laws in his spiritual universe, the bible. He believed that Nature's Laws of motion which underpin the dynamics of all physical things had a spiritual equivalent in the bible. He believed that the bible was written in a code based upon laws. He was right, but he lived too early to be permitted to see that code.
The LWs agree with both of these fathers of modern science and maths. We have discovered that: True Science and True Religion are the same thing, namely, a sincere search for God, through his various works. And further that True Art and True Religion are the same thing, a successful communication to a human audience of what we have discovered that God has given us. So a full and proper analysis of the Genesis creation account which reveals the two types of man that God and the angels created, fills the gap between archaeology and theology and resolves the conflict between the scientific priesthood and the religious priesthood.
Of course evolution and the missing link go straight out of the Window with a pre-adamic human race that could not procreate without angelic assistance! Every human being up until 6,000 years ago was created by the Holy Spirit switching on the reproductive powers of two parents and then gene zapping the resulting embryo.
Every preadamic child was effectively and iterated prototype design
Likewise the angelic manner of procreation is that a male angel and a female angel enter into a child rearing agreement of some kind and then go to the priest and ask for a child we imagine, by analogy with the pre-adamics. Then the holy spirit gives a child to the pair of them, without any pregnancy or female childbirth in the case of the angels. Presumably this child has 'genetic' character traits from both parents.
This may seem un-natural to us, but we are the enigma, we are the exception, we are the walking dead people who procreate. It is our method of procreation that is abnormal. For truly we sons of Adam are surrogate parents all, to our children which properly belong to God.
In summary, the pre-adamics, the post adamics, and the angels, all require a divine consent to have children. Only the constructively dead can have kids with no consent. Because Jehovah is God of the living not the dead. The preadamics and the non adamics were gene zapped after conception. The post adamics of the Kingdom will not need to be and neither are the angels. One does not gene zap a design of God other than to make the embryo into a non adamic son of God. God himself designed both Adam and the angels, so they do not reuqire and iterative gene zap prototyping. None of those groups get married, but they have a temporary child rearing agreement for each God given child. For marriage is the child rearing agreement for the dead. But the glory of gender is that it is our tutor in love all the way to divinity.
Only the dead reproduce sexually, the pre-adamics and the post adamics and the angels are infertile. Only dead ageing flesh is fertile without consent. But look how many barren women produced children in the scriptures...
Sarah was old and barren before the angel announced that she would give birth to Isaac. Rebekah was barren before God listened to the entreaties of Isaac her husband so that she conceived the twins, Esau and Jacob. Rachel was barren for years and for 10 sons to Jacob her husband, before God finally opened her womb and gave her Joseph. Manoah's wife was barren before the angel with the wonderful name announced to her and to her husband that she would give birth to Samson.
18 However, Jehovah's angel said to him: Just why should you ask about my name, when it is a wonderful one [it was Gabriel, the angel who announces births, whose name means: Able bodied man of God]?
Zechariah's wife, Elizabeth, was old and barren before Gabriel told Zechariah that she would have John the baptist. All of these similar accounts are saying something about sons of God coming from barren women. They are telling us that angels and pre-adamics and all those born again with associated angels in the kingdom have children by the grace of God, not by their own reproductive powers. It is only the sons of Adam who have them by sexual reproduction.
So now we can see what Isaiah really meant when he said...
1 Cry out joyfully, you barren woman that did not give
birth! Become cheerful with a joyful outcry and cry shrilly, you that had
no childbirth pains, for the sons of the desolated one are more numerous than the sons of the woman with a husbandly owner, Jehovah has said (Isaiah 54).
Or as Paul said...
26 But the Jerusalem above is free
and she is our mother.
27 For it is written: Be glad, you barren woman who does not give birth; break out and cry aloud, you woman who does not have childbirth pains; for the children of the desolate woman are more numerous than [those] of her who has the husband (Galatians 4).
Notice notice notice, that two causes of joy are described.
1. Not giving birth.
2. Not having birth pains.
The bible is maximally distributive. This means that there is a fulfilment for each cause. It is NOT the case that both causes of joy have the same fulfilment.
The daughters of Adam reproduce by being fertile and getting married and having childbirth pains. But the daughters of God who are barren and do not get married, EITHER do not give birth OR do give birth but do not have birth pains. They both cry out with joy for they have more children than their dead sisters. Amen.
The pre-adamic women gave birth, and had birth pains which were less than their adamic sisters, who suffer along with Eve. And the female post adamic women in the new system will likewise give birth with reduced birth pains like their pre-adamic sisters, being free of the punishment of Eve - this will be their joyful cry. But the daughters of God, the female angels, do not give birth at all, they are barren, they are reproductively desolated, and yet they have more children than all their human sisters!
As regards scriptures being maximally distributive - Consider also the words of Paul.
55 Death, where is your victory? Death, where is your sting? (1 Corinthians 15 NWT)
This does means that one group does die but gets resurrected so that death
occurs but does not gain victory over them. AND another group does not die at
all, so that death has no sting for them.
When Salome asked: “How long will death prevail?” the Lord replied, “For as long as you women bear children. […] I have come to destroy the works of the female (Gospel of the Egyptians, fragments 1 and 2).
So when death ends, childbirth will end. When the first death ends, birth pangs will go. When the second death ends, birth will go.
The Word Symbolic meaning of Matthew 1 shows the ancestral tree From Jehovah to Jesus. So each angel had a surrogate father and a surrogate mother.
3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).
This statement describes the creation of Melchizedek and of the pre-adamics and of the sons of God, the angels and the non adamic humans as being like that of Jesus, which was with parents and genealogy, although all of these were not strict genetic descendants of their parents, since they were not created by sexual reproduction. But in the case of Melchizedek, who was born as Jared, and then came into a second body as Melchizedek, the king of Salem, this second body must have had no genealogy. It must have been a shelf body of some sort, like a temporary angel. Actually he gave his non adamic non ageing human body Jaredian=Melchizedaic body as the validation sacrifice for the FRC. He was resurrected into an Abelian body under the AFC, and then later gene zapped into a Methuselaian body when that became available - see U9. He was presumably sealed into the CRC on Eden2 - see U54.