The purpose of this booklet is to provide the evidence for a formal accusation which I am making against 9 brothers, to be heard at a judicial committee in the 9 relevant congregations. These 9 are the 10 members the governing body, with the exception of Dan Sydlik. I have followed the procedure laid out by Jesus in Matthew 18:15-17:

Moreover, if your brother commits a sin, go lay bare his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take along with you one or two more, in order that at the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter may be established. If he does not listen to them, speak to the congregation. If he does not listen even to the congregation, let him be to you just as a man of the nations and as a tax collector (Matthew 18:15-17).

I have written individually to each of the 9, giving them each a copy of an earlier version of this booklet. That letter was dated 1995Heshvan6 and was sent Fedex to 25 Columbia heights to arrive 1995Heshvan7. Dan Sydlik is a witness that he for his part received his, but none of them listened, and neither did they even acknowledge receipt. I then presented each one of the 9 with a revised version of this booklet on Wednesday 22 November, handing their booklets individually addressed to them, to Travis at the reception of 25 Columbia Heights on that day. There are 4 other witnesses to this laying bare of the fault, namely Todd Ellison, Don Adams, Dan Sydlik, and a brother who whilst hoping to have his named inscribed in the heavens is not prepared to reveal it to any brother who rings him on the earth, who goes by the Designation of EZF. They also received booklets individually addressed to them, and all 13 received a letter dated 1995Heshvan20, which was 1995November17, telling them that I would be sending each of them this booklet and that whereas they had instructions from the slave not to read it, they are holding opposite instructions from the master of that slave, and I was asking them to obey the master in this case. The contents of that letter are included in this booklet in the section on relative submission.

We have now, therefore, reached the point in this procedure when I should speak to the congregation, and this I do by means this booklet and by the covering letter. I should like to present my case personally to each congregation, please respond quickly and let me know when this can be done.

If the accusation is found to be true, then none of the 9 brothers would be able to serve as an overseer any congregation:

Also, let these be tested as to fitness first, then let them serve as ministers, as they are free from accusation (1 Timothy 3:10).

Do not admit an accusation against an older man, except only on the evidence of two or three witnesses (1 Timothy 5:19).

If there is any man free from accusation, a husband of one wife, having believing children that were not under a charge of debauchery nor unruly. For an overseer must be free from accusation as God's steward, not self-willed, not prone to wrath, not a drunken brawler, not a smiter, not greedy of dishonest gain (1 Titus 1:6,7).

As can be seen from this booklet I have as witnesses to the sin which I am making accusation about: Matthew, Luke, John, Jesus and the holy spirit. In addition to myself and my brother Tony, who has seen the accusation and the booklet and helped me in the research behind it.

The Accusation itself is made in my covering letter and repeated here for the sake of completeness:

As regards each of the 9 brothers, Henschel, Jaracz, Barr, Klein, Barry, Swingle, Booth, Barber, Schroeder:

[1] They have no authority from Jesus to sit on the governing body of God's people any more, because the old faithful and discreet slave has fallen.

[2] The FDS which they are the head of has become the evil slave of Matthew 24, the wicked slave of Mathew 25.

[3] They are therefore each individually fixed with being reprehensible and belligerent

As regards brother Milton Henschel, the 5th president, the 5th angel, the angel of Sardis:

[1] He has the name that he is alive but he is dead, he is not a party to the new covenant, he is not in the remnant, he is not a part of the bride class, he was not anointed under Sarah, he is not a member of what we call spiritual Israel. He is not in the '144,000'.

I present this accusation to you elders of their congregations because Jesus instructs me that this is how accusations should be dealt with in Matthew. It is more than apparent that this accusation cannot safely be handled by the FDS itself, since if the accusation is true, then the FDS is the Evil slave and therefore it will ignore or reject the accusation dishonestly and it will wickedly come to the wrong conclusion. Therefore it must be judged by an independent body, since no man, no body, and no slave can judge himself, and the scriptures dictate whom this judging body is, it is the relevant body of elders in each of the 9 congregations (if they are all in different congregations that is). In England we have a police complaints authority which investigates itself, but it's conviction rate is considerably lower than that achieved by the police when investigating anybody else.

If the accusation is false (in the absolute sense), then you men should be capable of providing me a full scriptural rebuttal, which I would like to have the chance to discuss personally. Although the slave has not managed to do this, and they took 2.5 years even to acknowledge receipt of my first letter, which was a 400 page book which extended the work of Charles Russell, to deduce many new dates, in particular the date of the last day of this system, which Mathew 24:36, when translated in the correct tense, the past tense, the perfect tense, does not prohibit a knowledge of after 33Nisan11. In fact nobody knows the date of their marriage, not even the lamb, until he has made his marriage proposal and got engaged, and this did not occur until 33Nisan14, when he made the new covenant, some 3 days after Nisan11, when he gave the signs of the times to the disciples. Although God knows the date of all of our marriages even before we make a marriage proposal. If you wish to know this date, please read 'Letter to the Elders', it has 7 different methods of calculating this date, one for each of the Elders in my congregation, in Leyton, London, England.

The politicians among you will wish to just hand this accusation to the writing committee and ignore it, in order to maintain an easy life, protect what you preceive to be your theocratic advancement, etc. But please remember that there is more to life than just pain or pleasure, there is good and bad to be considered, which really equates to future pain or pleasure for everybody. Please therefore, decide to be good and serve God with your whole mind, and make an assessment, and do not put the commands of the slave above the commands of the master of that slave. If the Captain says don't jump but the Admiral says jump, then what should you do?? In this regard please read the section on relative submission and the sacred secret police. For the Master says: read and judge:

Why do you not judge also for yourselves what is righteous (Luke 12:57)?

But the slave says: leave that to us. And may I suggest that you are in danger of opting not for an easy life but rather for an easy death, if you do not use your own mind on this rather important matter, because this is the first commandment, and it is not without weight at this time.

Furthermore, although I do not adduce this as an accusation, the great crowd have been called to be baptised in holy spirit, in the blood of the Christ, and I have told the slave about this and they are deliberately ignoring this call, I use 'call' in the sense of the Gentile call etc., because they are more interested in their own position than they are in the salvation of the great crowd. A new covenant has been made, the greater covenant of Keturah, Abraham's third wife, as opposed to Hagar and Sarah who are the Law covenant and the New covenant respectively, the greater covenant of Rachel as opposed to Leah who is the New covenant, the greater covenant with Jacob, as opposed to the one with Isaac, who prefigures Jesus, and the one with Abraham who fathered the physical Jews, and today fathers all Jews through his covenant. Even the greater covenant with the house of Judah, rather than the one with the house of Israel, which was the new covenant. It is the greater covenant of salt, for salt preserves flesh, and this covenant will save the great crowd, yes even the great crowd have a covenant. And the great crowd are called to be sanctified into this covenant, for they are washed in the blood of the lamb in this system, and this is the baptism by holy spirit into the name of Jesus, the son. And they become a holy nation of priests, for their robes, even their priestly robes are washed in this blood. For Jesus said the haunting words:

Remember the wife of lot (Luke 17:32)

And Lot stands for the great crowd, because he physically survived the fire, whereas Abraham was with God looking down on the proceedings and he stands for spiritual Israel, all of whom are in heaven looking down on us before Armageddon, but they won't admit it because they love their position more than they love the truth. And Lot was not his brother, but his nephew, and guess what:

Lot had a wife, a covenant, a covenant of salt, hence her final demise.

In the interest of simplicity I am not charging the FDS with the attempted Genocide of the great crowd at this time. This subject is adressed in my book 'Letter to the Elders'. And the writer is the messenger of this covenant.

Before we go into the scriptural basis for my accusation, there are 5 structures of the code of the bible which I would like to show you, the reader, and I suggest that you read the sections on relative submission and How Jesus is present or absent. These are not necessary to see that the old FDS has fallen and that a new one has been appointed by Jesus, but they will help the reader to see why this has occurred and what he should do about it. All that is neccessary by way of ability to see that the old FDS has fallen is for the reader to be able to count to 7. However, due to the implications of a realisation that the FDS may have fallen, the reader will also need to love the Master more than that slave in addition to possessing the said level of numeracy, if he is truly to grasp this state of affairs. The 5 aspects of the code which we will have a quick look at are:

Distributive symbolism

Ommission symbolism

Every scripture has a further fulfilment

Two recitals mean two fulfilments

Elementary counting

If the reader wishes he can skip these sections which are called Ref:1,2,3,4 and go straight to the next section on relative submission and the sacred secret police. Nearly all of the information in this booklet has already been given to the whole governing body individually, it is included here as the scriptural justification for the above accusation. The majority of this letter is written as to the governing body themselves, if you are not on the body please excuse the format!

God's true people have identified that the submission to Caesar is a relative one:

Let every soul be in subjection to the superior authorities, for there is no authority except by God, the existing authorities stand placed in their relative positions by God. Therefore he who opposes the authority has taken a stand against the arrangement of God (Romans 13:1,2).

We recognised that since God is not divided against himself, if he says: Do not kill, and Caesar says: Kill, then we should in fact oppose Caesar's authority, because we are not in this case opposing his God given authority, through Satan. Rather Satan, the manslayer, has incited Caesar to exceed his God given authority in telling us to kill.

Likewise we are under the authority of the FDS, but Just as Caesar has authority by the arrangement of God, so the FDS has authority by the arrangement of his master, the Christ. Since sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, we must also be in a relative submission to the FDS, but in total submission to Jesus. So for example if Jesus tells us to treat our fellow witnesses as our brothers, then we would tell them our names if they ask us for them, since everybody knows the names of his fleshly brothers. This we would do even if the FDS issues instructions to us not to do this. If we on the other hand, choose to obey the instructions of the FDS when these are at variance with the instructions of the Christ then we are no longer Christians, we are Catholics, obeying the priest, or the pope, in preference to our Lord, living by 'infallible' Papal decree, from the 'wide awake pope class' bearing witness that to us, the FDS is God.

How is it that when I ring up presumably an unbelieving woman in the main post office in New York City she says to me: Hello my name is Linda how can I help you? But when I ring up my believing sister in the writing department, she refuses to tell me her name, and says that I can refer to her as:

The girl who picks up the phone when the girl who normally picks up the phone does not pick up the phone?

I then ring back and ask to be put through to this girl and I am told: I am sorry sir, I did not put you through to her, I do not know who she is! So then I need to find the girl, who put me through to the girl who picks up the phone in the writing department when the girl in the writing department who normally picks up the phone does not pick up the phone!

You do not have to be a bible scholar to see that these women are not treating me as their brother, and that therefore they are all sinning. Because I don't know about you, but I do actually know the names of my fleshly relatives, and this is the template the the Christ gives for my spiritual relatives. And if you sin, disobeying God and Christ, because you are told to by the FDS, this is no excuse. The FDS cannot change God's standard of sin by a decree in opposition to him. God has not changed, his law is not overuled by men. The captain cannot overule the admiral. No one is ignorant of the command to treat each other as brother and sister. I hope the point is made.

It is not true to say that the FDS always issues instructions which are in harmony with God's will as expressed in the bible. The above example of hiding one's name from one's brother proves this, and there are many, many, many more. Furthermore they are divided against themselves both in a temporal way and in a spatial way. In the US there is food at conventions, in the UK there is not, both of these cannot be in harmony with God's will. Today smoking is a disfellowshipping matter, whereas the anointed remnant in the second half baptism, the sanctification of which lasted from 1895Tishri to 1955Tishri were chosen with cigarettes hanging out of their mouths. This did not appear to inhibit the spirit of God from giving them a clean conscience even if their lungs might have been somewhat defiled. So it is apparent that one of these two opposing positions was wrong, since God does not change, it is our understanding of him that changes.

So now the big test on the reader, on the judicial comittee who judge this accusation and on every witness of the true God is:

You will each individually have to choose whether to obey the slave or the master of that slave. You cannot contract this choice out to any committee, it is your choice, it is the choice between true worship and false worship. Here is our master's view:

Now the latter were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with the greatest eagerness of mind, carefully examining the Scriptures daily as to whether these things were so (Acts 17:11).

They each did this individually, they did not contract this examination out to the elders or to a committee of some of the elders. They did not appoint a Beroean scripture examination committee to report back to them, there was no Beroean public enquiry set up by the presiding overseer. They served God with their whole minds, their own minds, each one of them used their own power of reason. For this they are each individually pronounced noble-minded by the holy spirit.

Keep on the watch therefore because you do not know on what day your Lord is coming (Matt 24:42).

Everybody has to be on the look-out. You cannot contract out this watching. This is a command from Jesus to all Christians.

Then they grasped that he said to watch out not for the leaven of the loaves, but for the teaching of the Pharisees and the Sadducees (Matt 16:12).

The Pharisees were God's appointed priesthood under law at the time that this warning was given. We do not eat bread from Babylon, this warning relates to our own food, the food from the FDS. You cannot watch out for leaven from your priest, the remnant, by asking them to make your examinations for you, these examinations will be full of the leaven that you are supposed to be watching out for. This watching is a thing that you must do yourself. This too is a command from Jesus to all Christians.

Keep on seeking and you will find (Matt 7:7).

It is not sufficient to look up the results of the seeking of your priest, you must seek yourself. You break this command if you continually ask your priest to do a search for you of something, to see if it has any merit.

If you love your Master, then you will obey his commandments to keep on the watch and to keep on seeking personally, and you will read the booklet and assess it yourself, in harmony with your conscience. If you love his slave, then you will obey the slave's commandments not to watch or to seek yourself but to leave that duty to him, the self declared 'Wide awake John class', and you will give the booklet to a multi-headed committee. So which is it to be? Whom do you love more? Who do you worship? How noble is your mind? Now do you see the spiritual household meaning of the scripture:

Do not think I came to put peace upon the earth; I came to put, not peace, but a sword. For I came to cause division, with a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a young wife against her mother-in-law. Indeed, a man's enemies will be persons of his own household. He that has greater affection for father or mother than for me is not worthy of me; and he that has greater affection for son or daughter than for me is not worthy of me. And whoever does not accept his torture stake and follow after me is not worthy of me (Matt 10:34-38)?

And don't you know that it is for this very day that Satan has been working for the last 40 years in particular, persuading all of you to rely totally on the FDS, which knew he could corrupt - because he corrupts every Adamic priest, and he ruins every Adamic priesthood, even the writer of this letter he will suceed with, but not until God has granted me victory in cutting the head off the present house of Eli.

He has lobotomised you, he has stolen not the bible, but your bible reasoning. Can you not see this? Do you want him to suceed in your case, you haters of Adam, your father? Will you, at one and the same time condemn your fleshly father for failing his test, dishonouring him, breaking the principle of the law to honour your parents, and like him fail the test that Satan has set up for you? Do not be fooled. And if you should sin, then let it be with your own mind at the very least! But don't sin brothers, show Jesus that it is him whom you love first, truly be a witness of Jehovah, not a witness of his witnesses. Be a slave of God and of his Christ, do not be a slave of a slave. Look what Peter said:

Whoever is overcome by another is enslaved by this one (2 Peter 2:19).

Do not continue to be enslaved by the now evil slave. Use your power of reason, let no man restrict it.

In the case of Paul and the circumcision, do you think that Paul blindly handed this issue to the governing body without using his whole mind on it first and coming to his own conclusion? Do you think that Paul had no opinion on the matter himself? The scriptures say:

When there had occurred no little dissension and disputing by Paul and Barnabus with them, they arranged for Paul and Barnabus and some others to go up to the apostles and the older men in Jerusalem regarding this dispute (Acts 15:2).

Therefore become an imitator of him, here is your precedent set by Paul. For in this he is certainly imitating the Christ (1 Cor 11:1, 1 Cor 4:16), who is known to have had a few disputes with Jews about the law of Moses. Paul did not refuse to think about the issue, or refuse to discuss the issue because it was going to have to go to the body. He served God not only with his whole mind but also with his whole mouth, nobody can dispute that. Likewise, you too, serve God with your whole mind. And serve him with your whole mouth, and dispute personally with me if you disagree with any aspect of the booklet, like Paul did. For if you pass this booklet on without reading it and without discussing it, then you are attempting to serve God not with your whole mind but with a whole committee of other people's minds, and this is idolatry, it is disgusting to God. For this issue laid before you is also about circumcision, not in the flesh made with hands for the first race of Jews, and not in the heart made by the spirit both with and without hands for the second race of Jews, but in the heart made with the spirit of God without hands for the Nethinim and through their hands for the third race of Jews, the Edenic Jews. This is the once only baptism in the holy spirit of the great crowd.

Possibly the most astounding scriptural precedent for open bible discussion that I have yet seen, and this one even shook me, comes again from Paul:

Brothers, when you come together in one place, one has a psalm, another has a teaching, another has a revelation, another has an interpretation. Let all things take place for upbuilding...Let two or three prophets speak and let the others discern the meaning. But if there is a revelation to another one while sitting there, let the first one keep silent (1Corinthians14:26-30).

This has the meaning that if a brother is giving a talk, and another brother in the audience suddenly realises some new understanding of relevance, then the brother giving the talk should shut up, and brother brainwave should stand up and talk. He should immediately tell the whole congregation his new understanding. He does not have to silently submit it to the writing comittee in order for them to consider it for a few decades first. This is the glorious freedom of the children of God as regards new understandings. This is the command from the scriptures. This does not mean that he should discuss it outside the congregation, for the passage is prefixed with 'come together in one place'. Incidentally this all being together in one place defines a congregation meeting. The book study is not a such a meeting, because it occurs in several different places, it would therefore for example be permissable for sisters to 'speak' in such meetings.

But we must be able to discuss anything with our brothers, although of course we should all recognise what is and what is not accepted doctrine by the slave. We are all big boys now. If a man refuses to discuss anything which has not yet been covered by the slave, then he is not a bible student he is a Watchtower student. He is not a Christian he is a slavian, is this not absolutely obvious? In the same way, if a body of elders refuses to allow discussion of anything from the bible, unless it has first been discussed by the slave, then they are not bible students they are Watchtower students. And of course this is what we have all become. And it is straight from Satan. He is the one who stops bible discussion. And what a great triumph he has had with us! He has eliminated all bible discussion from God's own people. We only discuss bible interpretations that have already been made by the Watchtower.

So here is your chance to show God that you love him more than you love your priest, and that you love the Master of the slave more than you love the slave itself, if you truly do. This is your test, and it is for this sin, about which they are fully aware, that the FDS has been rejected by God, and has become the evil slave of Matthew 24, and the wicked slave of Matthew25.

We witnesses believe that Jesus' second presence started in 1914Tishri, and that the Lord's day started then and that the time of the end started then, and that the last days started then, and that he 'came' then, this being the end of the Gentile times. This is really because we only have one date, so we fix everything to it. In fact Jesus' second presence began in 1884Tishri with the sanctification of brother Russell by holy spirit, the Lord's day started in 1895Tishri, with the beginning of the second half baptism of spiritual Israel, which was start of the greater Ephesian congregation. The time of the End started on 1992Shebat22, which was the day that I first worked out the date of Armageddon, this being 4600 solar days (Daniel8) before 1290 lunar days (Daniel12) before 2008Nisan14, the last day of this system. The time of the end is the time of the correct knowledge of the date of the end, said knowledge being first revealed to the last antetypical Daniel. Jesus came to the temple of his body, on 1918Nisan14 to throw out Bablyon, and on the third day, 1918Nisan16, he appointed the current FDS exclusively over all his belongings. And the Gentile times did end on 1914Tishri15. I am showing off here, the proofs for all of the above can be found in 'Letter to the Elders', and 'Letter to the Society', which the writing committee have several copies of, and so do I, if you want another one. I boast not because I want to be glorified, indeed I will not be glorified for this accusation, I will be reviled and ridiculed. But God has glorified me, to the extent that he has, and it is quite a large extent in terms of new bible understandings, because this was the level of glory that he judged that I would need to have, in order for there to be someone amongst his stiff-necked people who was prepared to listen to me. On the governing body there is one. Even one out of 10, God's farming percentage. I wonder how many will there be of you who listen?? The section on pages 340-343 of the reasoning book covers our current position on the return of Christ, and the aposite scriptures are examined there.

Let me start by saying this. Jesus' first presence must take the same form as his second presence because if not then his absence cannot be defined, this is a matter of logic. Therefore seeing how he was absent is the key to seeing how he is now present, since the two presences must be the opposite of the one absence and therefore they are both the same kinds of presence. His first presence did not end on 33Iyyar25 with the disappearance of Michael walking the earth in a human body, because if it did then the second presence would have to start with the appearance of Michael in another human body, and it didn't. Likewise the second presence cannot start with the end of the Gentile times, and be in fact a presence manifested by an increased preaching activity directed by a newfound kingly authority, because the first presence was during the Gentile times, and Jesus had no kingly authority in the first century.

So we need to find a common factor between the first century and the twentieth century presences, in order to define precisely what his 'presence' really is and was. We are helped here by two men in white garments, one of whom prefigures me, who said:

Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven[KI]? This Jesus who was received up from you into heaven will come thus in the same manner as you have beheld him going into heaven[KI] (Acts 1:11).

Jesus was ascending to heaven in a fleshly body that was not the one that he walked around in during his ministry. This is therefore the manner in which he will be present. So what fleshly body is Jesus currently present in, that is going to ascend to heaven, and that he did not walk around in during his ministry to the Jews? The answer to this question is: It's his fiancee. They eat his flesh, they drink his blood, and they are covenanted to him as his wife, like Sarah was to Abraham, to be joined as one flesh by agreement. It's like Paul said of the sons of Leah, in Jacobian symbolism:

We are members of his body (Ephesians 5:30).

He is the head of the body, the congregation (Collosians 1:18).

Because a husband is head of his wife, as the Christ also is head of the congregation, he being a saviour of [this] body (Ephesians 5:23).

This is the body in which he is present the second time, and this body is his body, but not the one he walked around in, and this body goes into heaven to be his wife at the marriage of the lamb. This body was certainly present in the first century and is present now. In fact it was absent from 119Elul until 1884Tishri, when Russell was anointed (see Letter to the Elders). Jesus' absence is the lack of the remnant, and Leah, the first woman to give seed to Jacob, who prefigures the first covenant by which Jesus procreates as the eternal father, left off giving birth, and then restarted after the two maidservants who are subcovenants of Leah and Rachel, Rachel is the covenant the I am anointed under, she is the covenant of Keturah, the newer covenant, the covenant with the house of Judah, whereas the new covenant, which is now actually the old covenant, the covenant of Leah, was with the house of Israel, (Jeremiah 31:31,33).

The length of the presences is nicely deduced from Matthew 24:37-39:

Just as the days of Noah were, so the presence of the son of man will be. For as they were in those days before the flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and they took no note until the flood came and swept them all away, so the presence of the son of man will be (Matt 24:37-39).

This period lasted 120 years, the warning period:

After that Jehovah said: My spirit shall not act indefinitely towards man in that he is also flesh. Accordingly his days shall amount to 120 years (Gen 6:3).

It also happens to be the maximum lifespan of any adamic human who lived after Moses, a thing which I am not proving here but also follows from Gen 6:3 [Jehoiada who lived for 130 years (2 Chronicles 24:15) was non-adamic - he was actually Melchizedek in one incarnation]. Jesus' human wife cannot live longer than 120 years, is the symbolic significance. So both presences had this length at most. Since we know that the constant feature ended 1290 lunar days before Armageddon (Dan 12:11, see Letter to the Elders), and since the remnant die a sacrificial death, they are all tucked up in death by 2004Elul14, 1290 days before the end.

So the presence started at the earliest in 1884Elul, and in fact Russell was anointed in 1884Tishri, in the antitypical pattern of the Christ and Adam, this being 30 years before the appointment of FDS3 as head of the domestics to feed them in 1914Tishri, and 33.5 years before, the appointment of FDS3 over all Jesus' belonging at the fall of Babylon in 1918Nisan (see Letter to the Elders section [7]). Incidentally the 1260 days of prophesying in sackcloth and ashes ran from 1914Heshvan25 to 1918Iyyar25, when the brothers were locked up, because Jesus' ministry was phase shifted by 42 days inclusive, due to his 40 day trip to the wilderness and his 40 day extension before his ascension, he was baptised on 29Tishri10. This really is the reason why the brothers were not locked up on 1918Nisan14 - that one is for Brother Reid, the CO who made me aware of this 42 day discrepancy over 4 years ago, a man who was actually a bible student rather than a Watchtower student, for he was frankly and honestly discussing things from the bible for which the Watchtower did not have the answer.

The second presence therefore runs from 1884Tishri to 2004Elul, and the first presence of Jesus in a flesh which is 'his', was from 2Tishri10BCE to 119Elul, it being the same length, this also being the exact lifespan of Moses who was born in 1593Nisan and died in 1473Veadar, I think, see 'letter to the elders' one month short of 120 years. Moses was a faithful and discreet slave of God you know - you don't think so? Read this:

And they are singing the song of Moses, the slave of God (Rev 15:3).

And for a fact he was neither faithless nor indiscreet.

OK so now we have two presences in the same form, namely the existence of a body belonging to Jesus, and they are both the correct length, and we have an absence in between. It's like John said:

Every inspired expression that confesses Jesus Christ as having come in the flesh originates with God (1 John 4:2).

For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist (2John7).

These scriptures apply to the two presences and to the first comings of each presence. For Jesus comes twice in each presence to the temple, which is his body, his flesh. Just as he went twice to the temple to throw out the money changers in his 3.5 year physical presence. And this letter is about his last coming, which has occurred already, and he has already thrown out FDS3 and appointed FDS4. He is present each time in the flesh, through his wife, the anointed remnant.

These letters of John are not grounds to verbally shun disfellowshipped people, by not saying a greeting to them. Jesus said that we should treat disfellowshipped men 'just as' tax collectors and men of the nations (Matthew18:17). Nobody verbally shuns wordly people, and nobody in their right mind refuses to say a greeting to a tax collector!

It is most apparent from Matthew 24, that the faithful and discreet slave is appointed during the second presence, since it's definition is in the response to the question: what will be the sign of your presence? So the existence of an FDS is a 'sign of the times', just like wars, famines and earthquakes. The slave is a feature of a presence, not of the absence of Christ. In particular is Christ is absent then there is no FDS. It's like the parable says:

When the season of the fruits came, he dispatched his slaves to the cultivators to get his fruits (Matthew 21:34).

His faithful and discreet slaves appear in the seasons of fruits. Why, does not nature declare the impossibility of a continuous remnant baptism? Which tree produces fruit all year round?

It is also apparent that the appointment over all the belongings happens on the master's arrival, therefore there must be have been two faithful slaves at the least, one appointed at his first coming deposing the Jews and another at his second coming deposing Babylon. In fact there are 4 FDSs (faithful & discreet slaves) for there are 2 comings in each presence, just as Jesus came to his father's house to evict the money changers twice in his physical presence. James says:

Exercise patience brothers until the presence of the Lord, Look! The farmer keeps waiting for the precious fruit of the earth, exercising patience over it until he gets the early rain and the late rain (James 5:7).

So James identifies waiting for the presence of the Lord with waiting for the precious fruit of the earth. This precious fruit is the remnant. Their re-appearance is the second presence. The two rains, early and late, are their two baptisms both lasting 96 years (see Letter to the Elders).

Now that we are all at the Red sea, the place of baptism in blood of the great crowd, now that you have put in print that they will get everlasting life in this system after the Son of man has arrived, now that you have chased us to this point, it is time for me to lift up my Rod, so that the waters can be split, the waters of the Red sea, the people of the great crowd. For the son of man has already arrived, but you did not know at what hour he came upon you, or in what watch.

In doing this I will show you that your rod has been broken in half, and that you are cut in two. Not that I can show you anything, but perhaps this time the holy spirit will move you to examine this letter and find out the truth for yourselves. If not then ask my brothers, they will show you, the ones who like speculating about dates, the sons of Charles Taze Russell, the son of God, the father of many such speculations and for this reason God made him the father also of the truth today, not the father of the sacred secret police. For God said to Moses:

As for you, lift up your rod, and stretch your hand out over the sea and split it apart, that the sons of Israel may go through the midst of the sea on dry land (Exodus 14:16).

But what Moses actually did was:

Moses now stretched his hand out over the sea, and Jehovah began making the sea go back by a strong east wind all night long, and converting the sea basin into dry ground, and the waters were being split apart (Exodus 14:21).

Oh dear, he forgot to lift up his rod! What an oversight! Not so, the account deliberately omits describing this action, this is an ommission symbolism (see Ref:3). The two greater Moses' after Christ do this. Paul did it in the first presence, splitting FDS1 in two, and I do it today, in the last presence, splitting FDS3 in two. I do it on 1995Heshvan7, 390 days after we entered the promised land on 1994Tishri7, this being the 390 days tied on my left side, representing my administration. There is also a 40 months wherein I am tied on my right side representing your administration. Moses lifted up his rod when he could see that the Egyptians were chasing him, and I have seen this now in the positive from your Watchtower on the sheep and goats and in the negative from your Watchtower saying please, please don't speculate about dates, you must stop, stop now. So like Gideon, here goes.

As was the case in my letter to you of 1994Adar17, which sent you chasing off after me, I have known a lot of the contents of this letter for some time but my instructions were to delay it until now so that all of my 220 brothers the Nethinim could be chosen on the basis on their love for God exceeding their love for you, before your authority is seen to have been removed, at which time the above test would no longer be effective. Their sanctification lasted from 1993Nisan10 to 1995Tishri10, 900 days, 30 months, although their sealing continues until 2001Nisan, this being 96 months. They are in fact 30 pieces of silver in one symbolism. For my rod is like a reed and it has measured the sanctuary and the altar and those worshipping in it, the results in this presence were:

Sanctuary 96 years, from 1895Tishri to 1991Tishri

Altar 96 months from 1993Nisan to 2001Nisan

Those worshipping in it 220

We already knew the number of those worshipping in the sanctuary namely 144,001. The symbolism of Revelation 11, refers to the overall temple of the Kingdom of God which works as follows:

High priest in Most holy Jesus Christ

Aaronic priests in Holy Spiritual Israel

Levites assisting Aaronic priests at altar Nethinim

Other Levites permitted in sanctuary courtyard Great crowd

Jews, could be ceremonially clean Other sanctified ones

Gentiles, could not be clean Unsanctified ones

The master of that slave will come on a day that he is not expecting and in an hour that he does not know and he will cut him in two (NWT/Kingdom Interlinear - Luke 12:45,46).

The slave that is happy is the slave that says in his heart: My master delays, and the master of that very slave comes when he is not expecting him and cuts him into two, into two slaves. Brothers truly I am saying to you today, it is this dichotomy that is the origin of the question: Who really is the FDS? For this is a question which has to be asked of two genuine FDSs (Faithful & discreet slaves). Babylon was never appointed over Jesus' belongings, Babylon is a prison, a place of detention, a place of removal from God's promised land, which today is not his physical food producer, but his spiritual food producer the FDS. Babylon the great is the prison between the faithful and discreet slaves in the first and second presences, this is the period when Jesus is sitting at his father's right hand, waiting for his enemies to be placed as a foostool for his feet. Therefore Babylon the Great cannot be the evil slave, because Jesus was never their master. The concept of Jesus presiding over Babylon the Great is totally ridiculous. They were never his slave, and the evil slave says in his heart that his master, Jesus, delays, and Jesus says that:

The master of that slave will come on a day that he does not expect and in an hour that he does not know (Matthew 24:50).

Thereby declaring himself to be their master. And this is a coming of Jesus. In fact Jesus says to his own disciples in the next chapter:

Keep on the watch, therefore, because you know neither the day nor the hour (Matthew 25:13).

So the evil slave have been Jesus' disciples, which is why we read:

If ever that evil slave....should start to beat his fellow slaves (Matthew 24:48,49).

The point being that prior to this abuse, the slave was not beating his fellow slave and was therefore not evil and was in fact faithful and discreet, the only other designation that we have for slaves of the master.

So since Jesus is the master of the Evil slave, this slave has to have been appointed by him, which means that it has to have been a faithful and discreet slave.

Therefore it is the FDS which becomes the evil slave, QED.

You are FDS3, there were two slaves in the first century presence. When Paul said:

I know a man in union with Christ who, fourteen years ago--whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know; God knows--was caught away as such to the third heaven (2 Corinthians 12:2)

My first guess at this was the heavenly resurrections, but in fact I had that timetable and the number of resurrections incomplete when I first calculated it, the correct version of these, I think, is given in Ref [5]. Heaven rules over the earth, so heaven can stand for rulership.

Physical Jerusalem was the first heaven ruling over Abraham's seed, the physical Jews, through the two mountains of the Aaronic priesthood on mount Moriah, and the Davidic kingship on mount Zion.

FDS1, the first part of spiritual Jerusalem, was the second heaven, appointed by Jesus to rule over God's people, the second race of Jews, the spiritual Jews.

FDS2, of which Paul was the first head, was the third heaven, ruling over Abraham's seed, over the third race of Jews, the Edenic Jews [the first century archetypes of the great crowd], the Israel of God (Galations 6:16). What we call spiritual Israel, is not the Israel of God, it is the Israel of Jesus, his wife. Of course FDS2 ruled over three races of Jews, the physical, the spiritual and the Edenic. And FDS1 ruled over two races of Jews, the Physical and the Spiritual.

The very name 'Faithful and discreet slave' means two slaves since this is a distributive symbolism (see Ref: [2]). The way that the two slaves in each presence come into existence is by a cutting in two in the symbolism of Matthew24 and Luke12. This cutting is actually done with their own sword, the double edged sword of the bible. For the very scripture which gives you the authority over all of Christ's belongings, also takes this authority away from you, and gives it to FDS4, as was the case with FDS1 & FDS2 in the first century. For Matthew says:

Happy is that slave if his master on arriving finds him doing so. Truly I say to you, he will appoint him over all his belongings (Matthew 24:47).

If ever that evil slave should say in his heart: My master is delaying (Matthew 24:48).

The same slave is first described as happy and appointed and then he is described as evil and cut in two, whereupon he is presumably rather disappointed. The point is that it is the same slave. So now we can see why the rock of the Christ was split in order for the water to come out, and why the waters were divided before the crossing into the new land could be made. And this crossing was made over dry land, which means that water baptism is suspended for a period. We are currently in this period (see section [9] on Thyatira).

And he proceeded to split a rock that water might stream forth (Isaiah 48:21).

And this is what Joshua said to the sons of Israel as regards the 12 stones in the river:

When your fathers ask their sons in time to come saying: what do these stones mean? You must then let you sons know saying: On dry land it was that Israel passed over this Jordan, when Jehovah your God dried up the waters of the Jordan from before them, until they had passed over, just as Jehovah your God had done to the Red Sea when he dried it up from before us until we had passed over (Joshua 4:21-23).

Look! the river Jordan has dried up, your water baptism is over. There is a new passover occurring, a passover for the Nethinim and the great crowd, for there is a swopping of 12 foundation stones, from the wet baptising Nation to the dry baptising nation.

In case your sons ask in time to come, saying: Why do you have these stones? You must also say to them: Because the waters of the Jordan were cut off from before the ark of Jehovah's covenant. When it passed through the Jordan, the waters of the Jordan were cut off, and these stones must serve as a memorial to time indefinite. Accordingly the sons of Israel did so, just as Joshua had commanded, and they took up 12 stones from the middle of the Jordan, Just as Jehovah has stated to Joshua, to correspond with the number of the tribes of the sons of Israel, and they went taking them over with them to the lodging place and depoisting them there. There were also 12 stones that Joshua set up in the middle of the Jordan on the standing place of the feet of the priests carrying the ark of the covenant, and they continue there until this day (Joshua 4:7-9).

So the 12 stones of the tribes of spiritual Israel will find a new lodging place on dry land. For you baptised the flesh with a bath of water but we will baptise the spirit, the conscience, in holy spirit through the laying on of hands. The foundation stones of Israel are changed yet again, and spiritual Israel is replaced with Edenic Israel, as we shall see in the counsel to Philadelphia. 12 years of baptism of the great crowd from 1994Elul to 2006Elul were decreed but sin has delayed the start. My first incorrect attempt to calculate the start of this baptism was 1994Chislev10, I have now recalculated, and this time I think I have it right, but I am not revealing the day [I was wrong, but I think that a division of the waters did occur 600 days after 1994Adar17, on 1995Heshvan17, but 'at length' the waters form a wall on the right and on the left (Exodus 14:22) - Ed]. Being explicit, the 12 stones removed from the Jordan represent spiritual Israel, and the 12 stones that replace them represent Edenic Israel for there are 3 Israel's, from 3 fathers, Abraham gave birth to the first Israel, fleshly Israel, Isaac, who is Jesus, gave birth to the second, spiritual Israel, and Jacob, who is me, will give birth to the third, for my wrestling is over now, and all my brothers are sanctified but not water baptised, they have broken this baptism, and we are ready.

The 12 stones that were in the river are taken out of the river, so their baptism is ended, and the 12 stones that were not in the river are now in the river so they take over the baptism. Of course nowadays Israel's are created by baptism, so this is the transferrence of procreation by baptism to a new Israel. It is the new seed, do not fight us accept us, we are the new FDS. Let us reconsider that famous question:

Who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over his domestics to give them their food at the proper time? (Matt 24:45).

Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one, whom the master will appoint over his body of attendants/therapists to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time? (Luke 12:42).

'All his belongings' counts as 4x, these are the 4 FDSs. This is the comparison:

Appointed Will appoint

Over Domestics Over curing staff

That evil slave That slave

Beats fellow slaves Beats menservants & maidservants

Give food Keep giving food

6x (Matt 24:49), 6th watch is when master comes and cuts in 2 (see Ref:4)

7x (Luke 12:45), 7th watch is when master comes and cuts in 2 (see Ref:4).

The Faithful and discreet slave of Matthew applies to FDS1&3. The Faithful and discreet steward of Luke applies to FDS2&4. We are the ones 'getting drunk' and FDS1&3 drink with us before they fall. FDS1 was already appointed when Jesus spoke in Matt24, FDS2 was to be appointed later. FDS1 did become the evil slave, in the wicked and sluggish 6th watch in the first century, FDS2 does not. FDS1&3 do become evil slaves, FDS2&4 do not. FDS1&3 are appointed over domestics to give food, in the house of spiritual Israel, the house of David, FDS2&4 are appointed over curing staff, baptisers, to keep giving food in the house of edenic Israel, the house of Jehovah, since FDS1&3 have ceased doing this at the time of new appointment, this being the reason for the new appointment. FDS1 beats his fellow slave FDS2, and FDS3 beats his fellow slave FDS4. FDS3&4 have no incoming slave to beat, they beat instead boys and maidservants...hmmm. The activities of the FDS of Matthew count as 6x before he is cut in two, this is the 6th watch, whereas the FDS of Luke has activites counting as 7x, the 7th watch, which also gets cut in two.

FDS1 is cut in two inasmuch as the first century slave was split FDS1&2, and in as much as the house of spiritual Israel is split into FDS1&3.

FDS2 is cut in two inasmuch as the house of Edenic Israel is split into FDS2&4, and the whole 'FDS' is split into the first and last century halves.

FDS3 is cut in two inasmuch as the last century slave is cut into FDS3&4.

FDS4 is not so easy. The cutting in 2 that befalls FDS4 could be the splitting into 2 watches, this does occur at the start of the 7th watch. But I think not, it more likely occurs within the 7th watch when Jesus spits the congregation of Laodicea out of his mouth. It is possibly the Zoar class, that accounts for this. Perhaps when FDS4 falls, it becomes non-exclusive?

2Tishri10 Jesus sanctified

10Tishri Jesus commissioned to build new temple

11Nisan Jesus teaches pharisees in temple, not feeding domestics

29Tishri10 Michael appointed head over Jesus' body

29Heshvan21 Jesus starts feeding at proper time, Peter Sanctified Jewish call

33Nisan14 Law ends, Jesus dies, Proselyte call

33Nisan16 FDS1 appointed over all belongings

33Nisan16 Paul sanctified

44Nisan Paul commissioned to build new temple

63Nisan Start of last week of Jewish system, Paul appointed FDS2 head

66Tishri22 Cestius arrives, FDS1 falls, at half of week

66Tishri24 FDS2 appointed exclusively over all belongings

I have not spent much time looking at FDS2, I have enough problems with the Chronology of FDS4 (see Letter to Elders section [10]).

Who really is the faithful & discreet slave, whom his master appointed over his domestics to give them their food at the proper time (Matt 24:45).

Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one, whom the master will appoint over his curing staff to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time (Luke 12:42).

Head/Elijah3 anointed 1884T

commissioned to build temple, teaches pharisees 1895T

head appointed over body to feed at proper time 1914Tishri15

starts feeding at proper time 1914Heshvan26

Babylon falls 1918Nisan14

appointed over all belongings 1918Nisan16

11 years, 30 years and 3.5 years

Jesus fed from 29Heshvan21 until 33Iyyar25, phase shifted by 41 days from his baptism on 29Tishri10 to his death on 33Nisan14, just like the first of the two witnesses of Revelation 11.

Head/Elijah4 anointed 1991Tishri17

commissioned to build temple, teaches pharisees 1992Elul11/14

head appointed over body to feed at proper time 1994Nisan4

FDS3 falls 1994Tammuz19

appointed over all belongings 1994Tammuz21

11 months, 30 months and 3.5 months and third day

Truly I say to you 10 men of the governing body, you have become the evil slave, even the wicked slave, who hid his talent, his watch, in the ground. For now we will tie up Matthew 24, Luke12, Revelation2&3, Matthew25 and Luke19. We will tie together the faithful steward, the counsel to the 7 congregations, the talents and the minas. We start in Revelation, but first we revisit 1Samuel3, and the pronouncement by Samuel upon the house of Eli.

Perhaps, if the reader has read 'Letter to the Society', he remembers that 1 Samuel 3 indicates that the Eli who is FDS3 will make a request and say to Samuel, who is me, after he had received the judgment from God on the house of Eli:

What is the word that he has spoken to you? (1 Samuel 3:17).

In the account this request precedes Samuel's pronouncement of judgement on the house of Eli. But the scripture describing Samuel's pronouncement that occurs after this request says:

So Samuel told him all the words, and he did not hide anything from him (1 Sam 3:18).

This implies that an earlier incomplete pronouncement had been made which did not contain all the words due to a hiding of some of them by Samuel. Also it is most important to realise that if there is a sequence of events which are represented by A,B,C,D,E, then a bible account can and often does describe only the sequence A,C,E, leaving out B & D. This is perfectly acceptable, it is just one piece in the jigsaw. In the case of 1 Samuel3, the account alludes to an earlier incomplete unrequested pronouncement, but does not explicitly mention it. Even if it hadn't alluded to it at all, this would not preclude it occuring. Likewise in the case of Ezra8, we saw 5 presidents of the Society:

Ezra, Sherebiah, Hashabiah, Jeshaih, Iddo (Ezra 8:15-20, Letter to the Society p301).

These stand for Russel, Rutherford, Knorr, Franz and Ritchie. They miss out Henschel and the 7th president. These miss the 5th and 7th presidents because those two make no appointments to the governing body, and the account is only of presidents who do make appointments. This is fulfilled in the case of Milton, for his watch has ended. I make 220 appointments, I hope. Now the account could have included a couple of other chaps who did not bring any sons or brothers, but then it would have been the whole jigsaw, and the the bible does not appear to be written in that way, although Artaxerxes was said to have 7 counsellors.

Counting time in sevens was God's idea, he invented the week, the 7 creative days of the creative week are the first thing in the bible. It is not a natural thing for man, who counts in base ten, or in dozens, to count time in sevens, God instigated this 'base' for counting time. Time is what he counts in sevens, with release after 7 times, this being the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a concept which relates always to time. In the Hebrew language, the word for 'seven' and the word for 'Sabbath' are from the same root. Therefore the very language of God's people was and is declaring that 7 has to do with time. The concept that 7 relates to 7 things occurring one after the other with a release after or during the 7th one (depending on whether we count inclusively or exclusively), is enshrined in the language of the old testament.

But I fear that I have not laboured this seemingly trivial point enough. The Society already have 7 standing for 'divine completeness', but the sense in which this completeness occurs is the temporal sense, it is a completeness in time, with the 7 repetitions occurring one after the other, consecutively, successively. For example, Daniel 9 literally says:

Seventy sevens, he is decreed for people of you and for city of holiness of you ( Dan 9:24 NIVHEOT).

From issuing of decree to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until anointed one, ruler, sevens seven, and sevens sixty-two (Dan 9:25 NIVHEOT).

It is implicit, it is understood that these sevens refer to time, and are therefore consecutive, it does not have to be spelt out. Similarly in the definition of the Jubilee, we see:

And you must count for yourself seven Sabbath of years, seven times seven years, and the days of the seven Sabbaths of years must amount to forty-nine years for you (Leviticus 25:8).

A 'Sabbath' of years is here defined as 7 years. The holy spirit is actually equating, identifying 7 with the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a function of time, therefore the holy spirit is declaring 7 to be also a function of time, as regards its scriptural symbolism or significance.

We also have the example of the 7 headed wild beast. This beast did not have 7 heads all at once, it had 7 heads one after the other, Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Medo-Persian, Greek, Roman, Anglo-American. Only after the one power lost its headship, did the next power gain its headship, in fact the gain of the succeeding power was the loss of headship of the preceding power.

We have the example of the 7 sons of Sceva, the Jewish high priest:

The man in whom the wicked spirit was leaped upon them, and got the mastery of one after another (Acts 19;16).

'One after another' is the point I am trying to make. So since Monday and Tuesday do not occur together, but former entirely precedes the latter, we now turn our attention to the 7 stars in Jesus' right hand and the 7 congregations of Revelation 1,2 & 3, and it is not a great leap of inordinate intellectual brilliance to recognise that these 7 may be successive in time, and may in fact occur one after the other in the Lord's day. They would then make up a week and the Sabbath over which the Christ is Lord, the 1,000 year reign would follow, this being the release at the end of 7 times. Just as in the case of the Gentile Times, the release of the malediction on the Jews occurred after the end of 7 times, or just like the falling down of the walls of Jericho, they marched round 7 times and then the walls fell down. Again in both of these two further examples, the Gentile times and the fall of Jericho, the 7 times related to time, i.e. temporal repetition.

Fine, so here is the application to the 7 stars and the 7 congregations in the Lord's day, which is after all when the vision is said to be for (Rev 1:10). The 7 stars are the 7 presidents of the Watchtower Society, who will preside before Armageddon. They are actually the heads on earth, of the entire congregation, the lampstand, which is all of the baptised brothers during the presidency of the star or messenger or angel. For although in recent years the presidents have claimed only to be figure-heads, having no more authority than the other members of the governing body, who decide things together, this is not theocratic because there is no creature which God created with two heads. And the governing body should not be a 10 headed wild beast, but one should be their head on earth as one is their head in heaven, Jesus Christ. He does not take a vote of the apostles to decide what to do. For more on the evil of democracy see my letter about the theocrats and the democrats (apologies for my misunderstanding of the American political system).

Now we are in a position to perceive the full force of Jesus' counsel to the 7 congregations, because:

Ephesus Brother Russell's presidency, from 1895Tishri

Smyrna Brother Rutherford's presidency

Pergamum Brother Knorr's presidency

Thyatira Brother Franz's presidency

Sardis Brother Henschel's presidency

Philadelphia Iddo, Daniel, Joseph, Bezalel, Samuel, Joab

Laodicea Second Benaiah

In fact this is why Artaxerxes, 'the king of kings' had 7 counsellors (Ezra 7:12-14). The greater Ephesian congregation, which is symbolised by the first lampstand started in Tishri 1895 at the start of the second baptism. Because, only then, were 2 or 3 gathered together in Jesus' name, in fact in his Hebrew name (See 'Letter to the Elders'). Therefore whereas the inscription on brother Russell's tomb reads: 'The Laodicean messenger', he was in truth 'The Ephesian messenger'. This of course was his mistake, and mine too, he foreshortened the Lord's day to end in 1914. And had it done so he would have been the Laodicean messenger. Whereas I, 7 times have mistakenly believed that the society would have to call me in line with Eli finally calling Samuel, but this happens after a whole load of other events which are yet future, which are precipitated by this letter. I foreshortened my battle with spiritual Israel, because I didn't want a battle I wanted to go straight to the predetermined outcome, as did Charles Russell. Actually this proves that the brother knew that the 7 congregations were temporally successive, Russell knew it! We now know less than him, we are going backwards:

Woe to the sinful nation, the people heavy with error, an evildoing seed, ruinous sons! They have left Jehovah, they have treated the Holy One of Israel with disrespect, they have turned backwards (Isaiah 1:4).

This obviously has a fulfilment in the last days, because Isaiah chapters 1,2,3 are all the same vision, and chapter 2 is about the mountain of the house of Jehovah being established above the top of the other mountains in the last days. If chapter 2 has a current fulfilment today then so do chapters 1 and 3 (see section [26] - conclusion).

Russell did not have enough information to complete the puzzle back then. If he were a human now he would like me put you people to shame for sure. Since he is not and he can't shame you people personally, I hope that he is pleased with the Job that I am doing in his absence. And I hope you are ashamed of the mess that you have made of his beautiful baby.

But here we are, it's a big battle, a battle between the seeds, between Esau and Jacob, the latter of whom surplanted the former, this being the meaning of the name 'Jacob'. Yes, you have been the hunter, loads and loads of field service, but I am the dweller in a plurality of tents, beautifying God's house so that we become so attractive that we will hardly need to do any field service at all. For know this, a thing which was worked out by Massoud, the third mighty man, the greater Fortunatus/Achaicus (1 Corinthians 16:17) the firstfruits of Achia, the greater Crispus/Gaius (1 Corinthians 1:14) baptised by the angel Paul himself, on 1992Tammuz30, 250 days before 1993Nisan10, the start of the baptism of the other 218Nethinim, he and Tony are Solomon's princely deputies (2Chron 8:10, 1Kings 5:16) :

A really good restaurant does not have to advertise

If our food was any good, and if the price was reasonable, then we would not need to do any field service, our kingdom halls would be bursting at the seems, we would be double booked and we would have a waiting list, purely from recommendations. But right now we are trying to sell stale hamburgers at $50 a piece. What do you think that this scripture means all of you who believe that Jesus' only commandment is to preach the word, and that this is his only work for his people at this time? and that the field service is 'our work period'?:

Well, on getting out, he saw a great crowd, but he was moved with pity for them, because they were as sheep without a shepherd. And he started to teach them many things (Mark 6:34).

Here is a clue to the meaning: the 'great crowd' stands for the great crowd. These people do not need to do any more preaching, they desperately need someone to preach to them, and to teach them many things. For our brothers should not be hunted like animals, they should be home grown, reared like sons, they should be cultivated. I do not mean to belittle the great efforts in hunting that have been made, for Jacob liked Esau's food:

Isaac had love for Esau because it meant game in his mouth (Genesis 25:28).

But look! you will have to abandon your nets (Mark 1:18), because:

From now on you will be catching men alive (Luke 5:10),

alive judicially, alive in the spirit, we will baptise them in holy spirit, like Peter and Paul used to do. One of these things which the great crowd will have to be taught is that we are now able to declare the complete future history of the Watchtower Society in advance:

Russell Chislev 1884 October 31, 1916

Rutherford January 6, 1917 January 8, 1942

Knorr January 13, 1942 June 8, 1977

Franz Tammuz 4, 1977 Chislev 22, 1992

Henschel Chislev 30, 1993 Shebat 10, 1994

Ritchie 1994 Tammuz19 2003Tishri

Benaiah 2003Tishri 2008Nisan

Brother Henschel, the angel of Sardis has a term of only 400 days as far as the true God is concerned, he being an Egyptian rather than a Jew, with a name that he is alive, i.e. one of the anointed remnant, judicially living, but in fact he was dead throughout this 400 days of affliction of the Jews, that was the congregation of Sardis. Gamaliel refers to this cryptically and to the subsequent bogus 6th watch of Judas saying:

For instance, before these days Theudas rose, saying he himself was somebody, and a number of men, about four hundred, joined his party. But he was done away with, and all those who were obeying him were dispersed and came to nothing. After him Judas the Galilean rose in the days of the registration, and he drew off people after him. And yet that man perished, and all those who were obeying him were scattered abroad (Acts 5:36,37).

Theudas is a very similar but not identical name to Thaddeus, who was Judas not the Iscariot, and the other conterfeit Christ was actually called Judas. Judas Iscariot himself is everywhere said to be 'one of the 12' (Matt 26:14, Matt 26:47, Mark 14:10, Mark 14:20, Mark 14:43, Luke 22:47). But there are 12 watches to spiritual Israel, the first 6 in the first century and the first 5 in the twentieth century, then finally Judas himself in the bogus 6th. So we can equate the 12 apostles to the 12 watches. And Judas not the Iscariot, Thaddeus, is standing for Milton, because the name is not quite right (c.f. Theudas and Thaddeus) and he is 'saying he himself is somebody', i.e. anointed, but was not. Whereas Judas the Galilean is standing for the true Judas who perishes and his supporters, 2000 swine, are scattered abroad. This is pretty cryptic, perhaps the reader won't accept it yet. Anyway the 400 men who followed Theudas are the 400 days of Milton's watch, before he was hamstrung in some way, and made into a puppet president.

God's view as I understand it is that the society is currently physically being run by another, one who hides his talent in the ground, for in the parable of the 5 and 2 and 1 talents, each talent is a watch of the watchtower Society, and when Jesus says:

Well done good and faithful slave (Matthew 25:21).

he is actually saying: Well done faithful and discreet slave (Matthew 24:45). And when he says:

Wicked and sluggish slave, you knew, did you, that I reaped where I did not sow and gathered where I did not winnow? (Matthew 25:26).

He is actually saying: Evil slave, you knew did you, that I reaped where I did not sow and gathered where I did not winnow (Matthew 24:48).

For these two are one and the same slaves. The extra talents that they earn or do not earn are the watches in the second presence, but it is not my purpose to go into this in this section, see section [15].

Tammuz 4, 1977 was June 22, 1977, the memorial in 1977 was on April 3. Please notice that the president of the 4th watch was inaugurated on the 4th day of the 4th month, this is not a coincidence. It means there will be 4 watches including his one, before the end. Just as the law covenant being concluded on the third day of the third month meant that there will be two further covenants, the covenant of Sarah, the new covenant, and the covenant of Keturah, the third wife of Abraham, the very new covenant. Just as the temple of Solomon being started on the second day of the second month, meant there would be two physical temples before the end of physical temples, and these were the temple of Solomon, and the temple of Zerubbabel.

With this perspective it is now possible to understand what John was saying to the 7 congregations. The reader can work this out for himself, or please read on.

I hold this against you, that you have left the love you had at first (Rev 2:4).

This was the love which the whole society first had, the new love of getting to know God for the first time, like the love of every bible study.

I am coming to you and I will remove your lampstand from its place (Rev 2:5).

The FDS was 'born' at the sanctification of brother Russell in 1884Tishri (See 'Letter to the elders'), commissioned to build the second temple of the remnant in 1895Tishri, when the congregation of Ephesus began, at the start of the second half baptism of spiritual Israel and appointed as head over the body, the body of domestics, the body of Jesus, in 1914Tishri, after 30 years and started feeding the domestics and condemning Babylon on 1914Heshvan21 the first day of the 1260 days of prophesying in sackcloth (Rev 11:3). This was when Jesus came for 3.5 years, from 1914Tishri to 1918Nisan in the pattern for that time. The lampstand's place was to be over all belongings, this appointment occurred in 1918Nisan, but Russell was removed before then. This shows that the slave with Russell as head never became appointed over all Jesus' belongings because he left the love he had at first.

You cannot bear bad men, and you put those to the test who say they are apostles, but they are not, and you found them liars (Rev 2:2).

The bad men who said they were Jews, God's chosen people, but were not, were the clergy of Christendom, whom the beloved brother vociferously denounced, he proved them to be liars, like his predecessor John the baptist said to the Pharisees:

Do not presume to say to yourselves: As a father we have Abraham (Matthew 3:9).

In other words: do not say that you are a Jew. In particular these modern day non-jews were the Catholics who believe they come directly from the apostle Peter, and possess his authority, it is true they have authority, but it does not come from Peter. Amusingly enough Russell's authority was in the line from Peter, for Peter was the first president of FDS1, the first century administrator of the house of David on mount Zion. Whereas my authority is in the line form Paul, for he was the first president of FDS2, the first century administrator of the house of Jehovah on mount Moriah.

The first and the last, who became dead and came to life again (Rev 2:8).

The death and resurrection in the Lord's day was in 1918Nisan, 33.5 years after brother Russell was anointed, through the 'two witnesses'. The Synagogue of Satan was Christendom, in particular the American church leaders, aided and abetted by the 4 apostates on the governing body who left the organisation after opposing Rutherford, in the battle that coincided with the appointment of the FDS, it's always a battle.

The blasphemy by those who say they are Jews, and yet they are not but are a synagogue of Satan (Rev 2:9).

The term 'Jew' is used to mean one of God's true people, i.e. one of Abraham's seed, i.e. a party to the Abrahamic covenant, i.e. having Abraham as a true father, i.e. being water baptised, i.e. being clean in the flesh, i.e. having one's sins in the past forgiven at any moment in time. This means being in the true congregation of the Christ, for membership of such is this baptism, and disfellowshipping is the breaking of this baptism. Some of the brothers of the governing body went to prison in this watch.

Look! the Devil will keep on throwing some of you into prison, that you may be fully put to the test (Rev 2:10).

The throne of Satan is the UN, right next to the Watchtower, just across the East river. This juxtaposition started in this 3rd watch. Rockerfeller Junior donated 8.5 million dollars in 1946/7 and the building was completed in 1952. Brother Knorr was president from 1942 until 1977:

I know where you are dwelling, that is where the throne of Satan is...by your side where Satan is dwelling (Rev 2:13).

Unfortunately the fact that Satan dwells by their side is repeated, so there are two ways in which he dwells by their side. The first way is the physical position of the UN, the second is through Balaam, Balak, and Nicolaus, all teachers in the congregation for the scriptures say in the counsel to Pergamum and Thyatira:

You have those holding fast the teaching of Balaam (Rev 2:14).

You also have those holding fast the teaching of the sect of Nicolaus (Rev 2;15).

Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, and she teaches and misleads my slaves to commit fornication and to eat things sacrificed to idols (Rev 2:20).

All 3 of these warnings relate to those who teach. And the counsel is to the angel of the congregation, the head of those who teach, it therefore all applies to the FDS and the anointed remnant. Jezebel cannot be women in the congregation because women do not teach in the congregation. Jezebel is therefore a class of men who are the wife of the king of Israel. This is obviously the anointed remnant, who are promised in marriage to Jesus. Their/her fornication is a result of her posing as a prophetess, i.e. her calling herself the 'wide awake John class', a channel for God, a channel for the holy spirit, rather than a channel for food for men. By posing as a prophetess Jezebel dolls herself up to look more sexy, or spiritually attractive than God, in front of the remnant, therefore the slaves Franz and Henschel give their admiration to her, and they love her, whereas the first commandment is to love Jehovah.

In fact they love money (Balaam), prominence (Nicolaus) and their relatives and leaders (Jezebel) more than God, and they follow after these things rather than after God, and this is spiritual fornication, and in fact adultery given that they are covenanted to love God first. This counsel is not to Babylon, it is to anointed Christians, and it applies today.

Balaam, the one who loved money more than God is today the antetypical Judas Iscariot, who is the bogus, hidden counterfeit 6th president who is currently running the Society, the one in charge of the money box, the one who hid his talent in the ground, yes the wicked slave in the parable of the talents (Matthew 25) who is the evil slave of Matthew 24:48 in one application. Balak is Nicolaus who is brother Henschel, the king of the Moabites, relatives of the Jews but not Jews. He has the name that he is alive but was a dead president, being a member of the great crowd. Nicolaus was one of the 7 ministerial servants appointed in acts 6 to deliver food to tables because this was not convenient for the apostles since they wished to remain with the Word of God, who is Jesus. This 'word' is currently in heaven, and the apostles are remaining with him, and the 7 certified ministerial servants are the 7 stars in Jesus' right hand, the ones truly appointed to deliver food to tables at the proper time in the Lord's day:

It is not pleasing for us to leave the word of God to distribute [food] to tables (Acts 6:2).

Russell was Philip the evangeliser to the Samaritans, the second call, standing for the second half baptism of the spiritual Jews, and Nicolaus who is Henschel was the proselyte, a DIY Jew. The angel of the sixth congregation, Philadelphia, is Stephen.

The leaven of Pergamum progresses to corruption in Thyatira and death in Sardis. This is obviously a temporal progression. One bible describes the three churches of Pergamum, Thyatira and Sardis, as the compromising, the corrupt and the dead. This is the progression of sin, James puts it: desire then sin then death (James 1:14,15), its the same progression, a progression in time. Jezebel is currently dead in the flesh as we shall see.

Milton is the Egytpian whom I killed and later buried in the sand, by my two letters of 1994Adar17 and 1994Tammuz9 respectively. The sand is not such a bad place to be, for as such by the seashore are the seed of Abraham, the true seed. The Next guy who I spot fighting is Judas, the bogus 6th president, a Jew strugling with a Jew, I do not deal with him, God does.

Kidneys remove waste material. They symbolise one's rejection of bad, not one's 'deepest thoughts' or one's 'innermost motivations' as the Watchtower propounds, the writer would respectfully suggest. This is a metabolic symbolism, a physiological symbolism. This counsel identifies the leaven as being the idolatry of Jezebel and in fact of all the high up one's in the organisation. This is the deep thing of Satan, idolatry of those in authority in the truth. The current worldwide increase, some 5%, in the last 'field service year' is fictitious because the whole congregation was disfellowshipped on 1994Adar13, at the start of the third Alienation times [See letter to the Elders section [6]], a thing that I am not proving here as regards the day, but we can certainly see that it occurs because Jesus says:

And her children I will kill with deadly plague, so that all congregations will know that I am he who searches the kidneys and hearts (Rev 2:23).

And Jezebel's permanent children are those of the great crowd who do not make it into the true 6th congregation of Philadelphia. But her tempoarary children are all of the great crowd, all of whom are disfellowshipped, i.e. killed by Jesus, in the bogus 6th watch. We have gone from 4.5 million to 5 million, and we will return to 4.5 million for the fifth watch has no increase, for all of the increases of all 7 watches are prophetically recorded in the bible see section [16]. Only 4.5 million make it into Philadelphia.

For at this time, although again I do not present the below as an accusation against the 9, all Jehovah's witnesses are not only unclean in the flesh, disfellowshipped by Jesus, but are also no longer Jews, no longer a party to the Abrahamic covenant. For any man baptised in water is a Jew, like John the Baptist, who was Elijah antetypically, who was actually Gabriel, said to the crowds coming to be baptised in water by him:

Therefore he began to say to the crowds coming out to be baptized by him: YOU offspring of vipers, who has intimated to YOU to flee from the coming wrath? Therefore produce fruits that befit repentance. And do not start saying within yourselves, 'As a father we have Abraham.' For I say to YOU that God has power to raise up children to Abraham from these stones (Luke 3:7,8).

Children to Abraham are created by water baptism which is the baptism into the name of the father, who is not God, but Abraham, this is membership of the Abrahamic covenant. The Jordan is the Euphrates in this symbolism. The Remnant in their arrogance and their ignorance have kept this knowledge from the flock. There were 4.5 million Jews in 1993, but now there are 5 million nobodies. The sin which has lead to this occurring is idolatry of the FDS, for we are no longer Christians, but we, like the Catholics, follow the priest, in our case the slave, rather than the master of that slave. We live by Papal decree, we have put our trust in mortals to whom no salvation belongs, it has been the blind following the blind and now we have all fallen into the ditch, in fact into the abyss. This is the fornication with Jezebel, the teacher, the wife of king Jesus, the remnant. Jesus says of Jezebel:

Look! I am throwing her into a sickbed (Revelation 2:22 KI/NWT).

He does not say: maybe I'll throw her into a sickbed. She is now in this bed, she became sick when my first letter arrived in 1992Elul, at this time her 70 years of land sabbath error which started in 1922Elul at Cedar point Ohio ended, and her false worship error started. These 70 years were the 70 sent out by Jesus, who prefigure the preaching campaign of FDS3 and the 12 sent out prefigure the preaching campaign of FDS4. This sickness ocurred in the 4th watch since it is counsel to this watch in the present tense. But the children are killed in the bogus 6th watch, since Jesus speaks of this death in the future tense to Thyatira, and so it must occur in Sardis or after.

Those who have good hearts but bad kidneys, are yes men, they cannot say no to bad. The congregations are full of such men. They can say no to physical fornication, but they cannot say no to spiritual fornication, they love the Watchtower more than the Bible, that is if they are even able to make a distinction between the two publications. They read the Bible only to confirm the doctrine of the Watchtower, whereas it should of course be the other way round. Of course they declare that they are reading the Watchtower to confirm the doctrine of the Bible, but they are liars. If they are put to the test and asked to follow the Bible, in the absence of any comment in the Watchtower they will not do it. And if they are following something in the Watchtower that conflicts with the Bible, they will keep on following the Watchtower not withstanding the Bible.

For the Catholics took the bible away from the eyes of the congregation by refusing to print it in English, but the Watchtower is more subtle, it puts the bible right in front of our eyes, but takes it away from our minds, by telling us that our minds will never grasp a new understanding from it, since only the remant can do this, Jezebel, the wife of the King, who 'calls herself' a prophetess. The remnant in fact call themselves a prophetess in their own book of Revelation:

He uses the John Class in unlocking the meaning of the prophecy ('Revelation book' page 16).

But they forget that whilst the FDS is exclusive over all of Jesus' belongings, interpretations do not belong to him, they belong to God, as Joseph said. And as Jesus said, when asked how a man who has not studied in the schools, has a knowledge of letters:

What I teach is not mine, but belongs to him that sent me (John 7:16).

But then Jesus says to the great crowd, Jezebel's temporary children whom she feeds and looks after, if that is the appropriate term:

I will give you individually according to your deeds (Rev 2:23).

So your master is here encouraging you, the reader, to consider your predicament, individually, not to ask the FDS what your predicament might be, they cannot save you, they are all in a sickbed.

Angel of Sardis Milton

Outer garments Priestly garments

White outer garments Declared righteous

Defile outer garments Priests who commit disfellowshipping sin

Walk with me The true priesthood, as in first century

Things remaining Remnant

Have the name that you are alive but you are dead

Milton is a DIY Jew, he is not in the remnant

The thief in the night was Judas, he used to steal from congregation the money box. The one further fulfilment, the unique antetypical Judas, steals not money but something far more valuable, sanctified Christians, the Nethinim, all of whom are now sacntified, he also has stolen Milton's talent which Jesus himself gave him, for Milton had authority even though he was not sanctified (see section [15]). But Judas has usurped Henschel to take over this watch, by financial control, or perhaps by Nethinim control, this takeover occured between 1994Shebat10 and 1995Adar13. But Jesus comes as a thief to him and to Milton, and they do not know at what hour he comes upon them, the two sons of Eli. He takes away from Judas his hidden talent, his bogus watch. For he is an exacting man taking up what he did not sow, see section [15]. Milton is told to repent, and he will. Milton this is what Jesus says to you:

Become watchful and strengthen the things remaining that were ready to die (Revelation 3:3).

You will do this.

Certainly unless you wake up, I shall come as a thief, and you will not know at all at what hour I shall come upon you (Rev 3:3).

Look! I am coming as a thief, Happy is the one that stays awake and keeps his outer garments, that he may not walk naked and people look upon his shamefulness (Rev 16:15).

So for a fact Jesus does come as a thief, removing their priestly garments. Therefore for a fact they do not wake up, and they do not know at all what hour he comes on them. Therefore he comes in the physical 5th watch. In fact he has already come, and I am telling you after the event. He came to appoint FDS4 head over the Nethinim on 1994Nisan4, 30 months after my sanctification and he appointed us exclusivley over all of his belongings on 1994Tammuz21, on the third day, after 1994Tammuz19, when FDS3 fell, this being 3.5 months after Nisan4. His comings are always to appoint a new priesthood, this priesthood has been appointed exclusively since 1994Tammuz21. It was the practice in Zerubbabel's temple to strip the Levites who fell asleep on the watch, although this is not referred to in the bible, and was not a feature of the law. Its like Jesus said just before defining both FDSs:

Keep on the watch therefore because you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. But know one thing, if the householder had known in what watch the the was coming, he would have kept awake and not been broken into, on this account you too prove yourselves ready, because at an hour that you do not think to be it the Son of man is coming (Matthew 24:42,43).

This clearly says that those who are commanded to keep on the watch fail to see the coming of the Lord, who is the Son of man, and they did not know in what watch he was coming, since he comes at an hour they 'do not think to be it'. I did see him, but I was not the householder then, you were. If the Son of man has already come, then he is trying to commence the judging of the sheep and the goats.

The scriptures which prove the symbolism that outer garments are priestly attire and white outer garments means declared righteous are as follows:

With the following Aaron should come into the holy place: with a young bull for a sin offering and a ram for a burnt offering. He should put on the holy linen robe, and the linen drawers should come upon his flesh, and he should gird himself with the linen sash and wrap himself with the linen turban. They are holy garments. And he must bathe his flesh in water and put them on (Lev 16:3,4). White outer garments

And the priest who will be anointed and whose hand will be filled with power to act as priest as successor of his father, must make an atonement and must put on linen garments (Lev 16:34). Nice proof the priesthood went from Father to son.

Yes, it has been granted to her to be arrayed in bright, clean, fine linen, for the fine linen stands for the righteous acts of the holy ones (Rev 19:8).

Also the armies that were in heaven were following him on white horses, and they were clothed in white clean fine linen (Rev 19:14).

Furthermore Jesus himself says to Milton himself:

He that conquers will thus be arrayed in white outer garments, and I will by no means blot out his name from the book of life (Rev 3:5).

One get's a name when one is sanctified, like Moses said:

And now if you will pardon their sin, and if not, wipe me out please, from your book that you have written (Exodus 32:32).

If Jesus swears not to rub your name out, then you are permanently in the book, for God does everything thorugh Jesus. If this is the case then you have everlasting life, which means that you are sealed, declared righteous. So now we are able to see the big picture in the counsel to Sardis:

Nevertheless you do have a few names in Sardis that did not defile their outer garments, and they shall walk with me in white ones, because they are worthy (Rev 3:4).

This means they 'shall' become the priesthood, and they will be declared righteous. This cannot refer to the remnant because they are already declared righteous, their baptism finished in 1991Tishri, during Thyatira. So it refers to the Nethinim, who are sanctified but not sealed and not yet walking with Jesus, as his true priests during Sardis. But they do do this in Philadelphia, the next watch.

One further thing: I have not been doing any field service, or reading any Watchtowers or since 1993Tishri10 because the food of FDS3 became totally unclean, rejected by Jesus, on that day at the start of the third Exedenic times. Not that it became significantly less apetising than it had been for the last 100 years on that day, but it passed it's sell-by date then. In fact the FDS rejected the food that I was offering on that day as I understand it, banning my work, and Jesus responded by rejecting their food. Because it was time to start distributing my food, the food of Joseph. This uncleaness, partial uncleaness, corruption, leaven, of the food of FDS3 even before it was rejected, is witnessed to in the counsels to Pergamum and Thyatira:

Those holding fast the teaching of Balaam who went teaching Balak to put a stumbling block before the sons of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols (Rev 2:14).

Jezebel who calls herself a prophetess, and she teaches and misleads my slaves to commit fornication and to eat things sacrificed to idols (Rev 2:20).

There then follows a beautiful ommission symbolism for we read:

But she is not willing to repent of her fornication (Rev 2:21).

What about eating things sacrificed to idols? Well Freddie did repent of this, he accepted that there was merit to my work, and directed that it should be looked at. I know this, from various scriptures, and it has been confirmed to me.

Here is something more about Nicolaus who is Milton.

Nicolaus was the seventh ministerial servant of Acts 6:5. This Nicolaus is the only one in the bible, other than the one mentioned in Revelation. The Insight book (Nicolaus) makes the statement: 'There is no reason to connect the sect with Nicolaus the Antiochian Christian just because he is the only person of that name in the bible, as has also been done by some early church writers'. By saying this, the FDS is condemned by its own mouth, as having less faith than 'some early church writers' in the perfection of the holy book.

The mere fact that there is only one other reference to a 'Nicolaus' in the whole bible is the strongest evidence that this reference must shed some light on the sect, because the bible is a self-contained book and it has no 'loose ends' in it. Nicolaus was a proselyte from Antioch, i.e. he was not born a Jew, he made himself one! He was a DIY Jew! Antioch was when we first took the divinely determined name 'Christians', but with Milton, his name lacked this divine determination. 7 ministerial servants are the 7 watches. Russell was Philip, these were and will be searched out by the governing body, and be appointed by the resurrected first century apostles.

So brothers, search out for yourselves, 7 certified (being witnessed to) men from among you, full of spirit and wisdom, that we may appoint them over this necessary business (Acts 6:3).

These are the things he says who is holy, who is true, who has the key of David, who opens so that no one will shut, and shuts so that no one opens. I know your deeds - Look! I have set before you an open door, which no one can shut - that you have a little power (Revelation 3:7,8).

The key to the house of David the the baptism of spiritual Israel, the door to this house was actually closed in 1955Tishri, and the sealing ended in 1991Tishri, the door to that temple is well and truly shut, and no one can open it. But the door to the house of Jehovah, opened by the key of Solomon, namely widsom, is now open and no one can shut it. And it is set before me and this is my power, like the hair of Samson, to baptise the great crowd. The whole society is disfellowshipped they can only be rewater-baptised by Elijah4. No one else can do this. Their salvation is wholly, totally and utterly dependent upon me, in the physical outworking.

My ex-girlfriend in the truth correctly worked out the date of Armageddon for herself based on 1 Timothy 2:6 'Who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all', Adam sinned aged 33.5, this being the start of Satan's 6,000 year lease, (he was born on 4027Tishri10) she was a clever girl, she got this before I did, she fed me in fact. She must be in the 'Wide awake John class'!

Actually the ransom was not a sinless man for a sinless man. Because the statement 'sinless' man has no weight unless one knows for how long this man actually resisted sin. We know that Jesus obeyed the law of Moses for 33.5 years, but I am sure that Richard Nixon, or Madonna could have obeying it for 5 seconds, would they then, had they been non-adamic, have been a corresponding ransom for Adam, I think not. Likewise how long does one have to stay under test before one is sinless? If the test has no time limit then it would last forever and so one would never pass it. Therefore a sinless man must have an associated time period of sinlessness.

Let us presume therefore that Adam was sinless for x years. Then the true God would require as a judicial penalty, the body of a non-adamic man who had been sinless for at least x years in order that this body could replace Adam's body and effect the ransom. But if the ransom is a corresponding one, then the bodies would correspond in sinlessness, and therefore the ransomer would also have been sinless for x years. Since the ransomer was sinless for 33.5 years, we deduce that the ransomee was sinless for this period as well and so Adam sinned in fact on 3993Nisan14, he was born on 4027Tishri10, I am not proving this here (see letter to the Elders). From this we deduce that the last day of this system is 2008Nisan14, and actually the first day of the new system is 2008Nisan16, for kingdom changes happen on the third day.

Adam's sin was the original passover, because he was a firstborn condemned to death, but the angel passed over him, and zapped his genes to make him ageing rather than killing him immediately. This passover, or stay of execution, is the basis of all of our lives. This is the fundamental importance of the passover, and this is why he sinned on Nisan14, or should I say, he sinned on Nisan14, and this is why the passover is then. 2008Nisan14, is 2008March21, the vernal equinox.

Sadly this girl would never admit to having done this now, because as the reader will know, when you first go out with a girl everything that you do is totally brilliant, and then when you finish with her everything that you ever did was absolute rubbish, until such time as you go out with her again that is. Actually her father has had six incorrect attempts so far at the date he told me - a serious speculator. Anyway she once told me about a chap who was disfellowshipped because he thought that Isaiah 22 and the removing of Shebna from being the steward over the house, and his replacement with the servant Eliakim, referred to the fall of the FDS and its replacement with a new FDS.

He was speading this doctrine among the congregation. In fact even if he had been wrong, this still would not have been a sin, so long as he wasn't spreading this doctrine outside the congregation. He is entitled to his opinion, and he is entitled to share it with his baptised brothers. But he should not preach it to non-believers as if it was the society's doctrine, and neither should he attempt to woo outsiders with his personal brilliance. So he should not have been disfellowshipped even had he been wrong, unless he was using this prophecy to incorrectly undermine the authority of the FDS at that particular time, thereby constituting himself leaven, he may well have been doing that I do not know. I suspect he was merely acting as a prophet of the eventual downfall of the FDS, and like their forefathers did to the prophets of old, the spiritual Jews killed him. But as it happens he was absolutely right! For the scripture which says:

And I will clothe him with your robe, and your sash I shall firmly bind about him, and your dominion I shall give into his hand, and he must become a father to the inhabitant of Jerusalem and to the house of Judah. And I will put the key of the house of David [no less] upon his shoulder,

and he must open without anyone's shutting, and he must shut without anyone's opening (Isaiah 22:21,22).

who has the key of David, who opens so that no one will shut, and shuts so that no one opens (Rev 3:7).

The comparison of Isaiah22 with Revelation3 reveals that Eliakim is the president of Philadelphia. So today you are being told that God has extracted vengeance on behalf of that perspicacious lover of the truth, who was thorwn out of 'the truth' by hypocrites. And now those who disfellowshipped him whether in error or not, are themselves disfellowshipped, and there is no error in their case. He is welcome in the congregation of Philadelphia, which will be known as 'the life' and so is my ex-girlfriend for that matter and her speculating father, and the reader. Furthermore, I have got the key to your temple on my shoulder! What do you think that could mean my brothers in the spirit??

But there is more:

Look! I will give those from the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews and yet are not but are lying - Look! I will make them come and do obeisance at your feet, and make them know that I have loved you (Rev 3:9).

I have always wished that this last phrase was in the present tense. Just like the true God said through Malachi:

But I loved Jacob and Esau I have hated (Malachi 1:2,3)

Actually this although it is distressing to me, is wonderful for the remnant, because though he hates you today, and he can, he is God, he will love you again, because this is in the past tense. And though he has loved me, I guess his love cools off when I become the president. This can only be because my love for him cools of at that time. Brothers, you, for the most part, and I are declared righteous. Our prayers have much force, please pray for me, as I pray for you. I feel it you know, this love, do you? I know you do. When I leave him, then I feel him having left me, and then when I come back to him, I am happy, for no apparent reason. When I really leave him my stomach churns and churns and I can't concentrate. It's like being love sick. Thank God for my stomach! Look! this love is bigger and better than the presidency of the Watchtower, for a fact. It conquers all fear. Now Jacob met Esau after he had crossed the river, the Jabbok, so come on brothers, I want to see your face like the face of God (Gen 33:10), before you see my face like the face of an angel (Acts 6:15).

You spiritual Jews are no longer Jews, just like the physical Jews. You ceased being Jews on 1994Heshvan8, when the call went out to all the world to be baptised in Jesus' blood, a call which you failed to make public. This was on the 4th day after 1994Heshvan4, which is the end of the week of months from 1994Nisan4 to 1994Heshvan4, at the mid-point of which on 1994Tammuz19, FDS3 was cut in two and on 1994Tammuz21 FDS4 was appointed by Jesus over all his belongings. 1994Heshvan8 was the start of the third Gentile times, a malediction which ended 7 months later, in fact on 1995Sivan29, when FDS4 took over from a food point of view, this being the start of the 100 months of authority of Cornelius, who is the 6th president. Its like Paul said:

For he is not a Jew who is one on the outside, nor is circumcision that which is on the outside upon the flesh. But he is a Jew who is one on the inside, and [his] circumcision is that of the heart by spirit, and not by a written code. The praise of that one comes, not from men, but from God (Romans 2:28,29).

When the call went out to the whole world to be baptised into FDS4 by Elijah4, then the water baptism of FDS3 and Elijah3 became void, and the witnesses were no longer disfellowshipped sons of Abraham, or unclean or dead sons, they were now not even sons. They are dead ex-sons. The remnant for the most part are sons of God, even declared righteous, but they are not sons of Abraham, they are therefore not Jews, they are a synagogue of Satan, as was the case with the members of Babylon the great. The reader may by now see that a Jew is any man who is a son of Abraham and it fact all witnesses baptised in water before 1994Adar13, have been Jews. Our understanding of the scripture in Zechariah 8:23, is correct for spiritual Israel were Jews, but so were what we call the great crowd.

Once the reader realises that all the sevens in the book of Revelation are temporally succesive and that angels can be presidents of the Watchtower then the book starts to fall apart, and the 7 seals are broken. In Revelation14, the 6 successive angels from verses 6 to 18, are the first 6 presidents. In Revelation16, the 7 angels are 7 years of plenty under the 6th angel, from 1994Elul to 2001Elul, I think, hence the 'bowls of anger' who ever heard of anger being in a bowl? So this is the meaning of Revelation 5:

And I saw in the right hand of the one seated upon the throne a scroll written within and on the reverse side, sealed tight with 7 seals (Rev 5:1).

The 7 seals are the sealed up true meaning of the number 7 in the book of Revelation, as exposed above, written on the reverse side and within, i.e. coded, just like the ten commandments, written on both sides. Therefore the study question for the reader is:

Who is worthy to open the scroll and loose its seals? (Rev 5:2).

That is what YOU have learned from Epaphras our beloved fellow slave, who is a faithful minister of the Christ on our behalf (Coll 1:7).

All my affairs Tychicus, [my] beloved brother and faithful minister and fellow slave in [the] Lord, will make known to YOU (Coll 4:7).

Epaphras, who is from among YOU, a slave of Christ Jesus, sends YOU his greetings, always exerting himself in YOUR behalf in [his] prayers, that YOU may finally stand complete and with firm conviction in all the will of God (Coll 4:12).

Paul, a slave of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ according to the faith of God's chosen ones and the accurate knowledge of the truth which accords with godly devotion (Titus 1:1).

James, a slave of God and of [the] Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes that are scattered about: Greetings! (James 1:1).

Simon Peter, a slave and apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who have obtained a faith, held in equal privilege with ours, by the righteousness of our God and [the] Savior Jesus Christ (2 Peter 1:1).

Jude, a slave of Jesus Christ, but a brother of James, to the called ones who are loved in relationship with God [the] Father and preserved for Jesus Christ (Jude 1).

A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John (Rev 1:1).

Paul, Peter, James, Jude, Epaphras, Tychicus, John, the only 7 men said to be slaves of God or of Jesus, in the new testament...hmmm.

For it is just as when a man about to travel abroad, summoned slaves of his and committed to them his belongings (Matthew 25:14).

The man is Jesus. His belongings here in Matthew chapter 25 are the same belongings which are referred to as 'all his belongings' in Matthew chapter 24. How we haven't seen this before I really do not know, it is not difficult to grasp is it? Likewise the 'slaves' in the plural in this account who are described as 'good and faithful' in Matthew 25 are none other than the various constituents of the slave who is described as 'faithful and discreet' in Matthew 24, again this can hardly be described as a giant leap of abstract symbolic agility. Furthermore the slave who is described as 'wicked and sluggish' in Matthew 25 is none other than the slave who is described as 'evil' in Matthew 24. This sort of thing is I believe referred to in Watchtower parlance as a 'blinding flash of spiritual light emblazening the theocratic firmament', masters of the well crafted understatement. So here is the symbolism as I understand it today:

Man who travels abroad Jesus going to heaven

Slaves FDS1,2,3,4

Slaves summoned Appointed to feed at proper time

Belongings commited to them Appointed over all his belongings

5 talents given to 1st slave 5 watches of FDS1, spiritual Israel

2 talents given to 2nd slave 2 watches of FDS2, spiritual Rome

1 talent given to wicked and sluggish slave

Authorised 6th watch, 1st presence

Unauthorised 6th watch, 2nd pres.

5 talents gained by 1st slave 5 watches of FDS3, spiritual Israel

2 talents gained by 2nd slave 2 watches of FDS4, spiritual Rome

Silver monies Nethinim - worth less than the gold monies of spiritual

Silver money hidden in ground Nethinim hidden by the wicked slave

Talent hidden in the ground 6th watch is authorised but hidden, in 1st presence, and

Reaping where you did not sow Removing unsanctified bogus 6^th president in first

Gathering where you did not winnow Removing unsealed bogus 6^th president in 2nd presence

Sowing Baptism into the name of the son

Winnowing Baptism into the name of the holy spirit, i.e. sealing,

Him that has 10 talents Spiritual Israel

Bankers Congregation overseers, elders bethelites etc.

Deposit silver monies with bankers Let overseers know that the baptism of the Nethinim is

Interest New ones baptised by Nethinim, The baptism of the

The change in slaves is a temple cleansing, such things are the occassion of a coming of the Christ, the Son of man, he therefore comes in the fifth watch. For he came twice to the temple during his physical presence to overthrow the tables of the money lenders and he comes twice to the temple of his own body, the remnant, during his second presence, once to appoint FDS3 and once to appoint FDS4. He is trying to effect the judgement between the sheep and goats referred to in the recent Watchtower, leading to everlasting life for the great crowd in this system, and you are preventing him from doing it, so he is getting no interest right now, for interest is sanctified brothers.

So spiritual Israel take the blame for the wicked and sluggish slave, who is actually two slaves, the wicked slave and the sluggish slave, by distributive symbolism (see ref:[2]). Just as the 'good and faithful' slave it actually the good slave and the faithful slave by distributive symbolism. On eslave in each presence. The first century 6th watch is more sluggish than wicked, it does not effect a betrayal, Judas not the Iscariot, whereas the 20th century bogus 6th watch is more wicked than sluggish, it does effect a betrayal, Judas Iscariot. Because the slave with 5 talents does not get the wicked slave's talent, but the slave with 10 talents gets it. Of course in the account this is the same slave, but the symbolic meaning is that the 10th official watch of spiritual Israel, which is the 5th watch in the second presence the second Sardis, the watch of which Milton was the angel, gets has a talent hidden in it, and therefore becomes a puppet watch:

Take away the talent from him and give it to him that has 10 talents. For to everyone that has, more will be given, and he will have abundance, but as for him that does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him (Matthew 25:28,29).

At first sight this looks like rubbish, how can you take 'what he has' from a man who 'does not have'? We can solve this dilemma, by recognising that there must be an ambiguity of ownership going on. There is a 'having' in the sense of being the rightful owner, and there is a 'having' in the sense of having actual possession. The resolution is to recognise that a theft of a talent has occurred. As regards 'the one that received the one talent' (Matthew 25:24), this does not have to be the first century wicked and sluggish slave, because he was the only wicked slave to be given a talent, but he was not the only wicked slave to receive a talent, since the twentieth century wicked slave stole his talent from the previous watch, receiving it without being given it. Because the wicked slave with one talent did not earn an extra talent, so the bogus 6th watch in the second presence is unauthorised, having no talent of its own, so the talent that this wicked slave operates under must be stolen.

The 20th century wicked slave would therefore actually be the one that 'has' something that he does not 'have'/own. So his stolen talent is removed and returned to the rightful owner, the slave which has/owns 10 talents. The first century wicked slave had something that he did have/own, as so is ruled out of verse 29.

Milton, the 5th president wasn't sown by Jesus although this is not witnessed to in this account, he was the 5th talent gained by the first slave, it is wi